← IB Geography · SL · HL · IB Geography revision
⭐ 0
IB Diploma Geography SL and HL · Option D: Geophysical hazards
Mini-LessonSL and HL

Geophysical hazards

10 missions. Guess, learn, then check. Your place is saved.

  1. Mission 1The Atlantic is about 2.5 cm wider every year. What moves the plates?
  2. Mission 2In 1985 a volcano 45 km away killed about 23,000 people in Armero, two hours after it erupted. How?
  3. Mission 3The central and eastern USA used to have about 25 earthquakes of magnitude 3 or more a year. In 2015 it had 1,010. What changed?
  4. Mission 4About 1,600 magnitude-5 earthquakes strike each year, and about one magnitude-8. Which should planners prepare for?
  5. Mission 5In one Aceh village, the 2004 tsunami killed four females for every male. Why would a wave "choose"?
  6. Mission 6Nepal 2015 and Kaikōura 2016 were both magnitude 7.8. One killed more than 8,790 people; the other killed 2. Why?
  7. Mission 7On Fuego, in 2018, a golf resort evacuated safely. A village two kilometres further on was buried. Why?
  8. Mission 8In 2017 a hillside above Freetown collapsed; about 1,141 people were declared dead or missing. A Californian landslide has been moving since 1956 and is still destroying homes. Are they the same hazard?
  9. Mission 9Large earthquakes are not becoming more common. So why do experts expect more people to be affected by geophysical disasters?
  10. Mission 10By 2013, Hong Kong said it had cut the landslide risk from its man-made slopes by about 75%. Is preventing disasters worth more than responding to them?
Mission 1

Mission 1: The Atlantic is about 2.5 cm wider every year. What moves the plates?

Make a guess: The Atlantic is about 2.5 cm wider every year. What moves the plates?

Mission 1

Plates and their margins

Three types of plate marginDivergentplates move apartlithosphereasthenospherespreading centreConvergentplates move towards each other; one may sinkone plate sinksTransform (conservative)plan view: plates slide horizontally past one anotherSource: USGS, This Dynamic Earth (margin types); Earle,Physical Geology (lithosphere, asthenosphere). Schematic,not to scale.
  • Earth's rigid outer layer, the lithosphere, is broken into plates that move over the weaker asthenosphere below.
  • Divergent margins: plates move apart at spreading centres.
  • Convergent margins: plates move towards each other, and one may sink.
  • Transform (conservative) margins: plates slide horizontally past one another.
Mission 1

Internal heating

Where plate-driving heat and forces come fromStep 1: heat and convectionradioactive decayresidual heatheat sources; the heat slowly migrates towards thesurfacecoremantlelithosphere (thin,not to scale)Mantle convection: hotter, lighter material rises (red);colder, denser material sinks (blue).Step 2: ridge push and slab pullridge pushplate slidesdownhill off theraised ridgeslab pullcold, dense slab drags theplatehigh, hot ridgesubductionzoneSources: USGS, This Dynamic Earth (heat sources,convection, slab pull); Earle, Physical Geology (ridgepush). Schematic, not to scale.
  • Heat inside Earth comes from two main sources: radioactive decay and residual heat left over from Earth's formation.
  • The heat slowly migrates towards the surface.
  • Hotter, lighter material rises and colder, denser material sinks: mantle convection.
Mission 1

Convection, ridge push and slab pull

Where plate-driving heat and forces come fromStep 1: heat and convectionradioactive decayresidual heatheat sources; the heat slowly migrates towards thesurfacecoremantlelithosphere (thin,not to scale)Mantle convection: hotter, lighter material rises (red);colder, denser material sinks (blue).Step 2: ridge push and slab pullridge pushplate slidesdownhill off theraised ridgeslab pullcold, dense slab drags theplatehigh, hot ridgesubductionzoneSources: USGS, This Dynamic Earth (heat sources,convection, slab pull); Earle, Physical Geology (ridgepush). Schematic, not to scale.
  • Mantle convection: the older view was that convecting mantle drags the plates along.
  • Ridge push: new plate at a spreading ridge is hot and stands high, so gravity makes it slide away downhill from the ridge.
  • Slab pull: a cold, dense oceanic plate sinking at a subduction zone drags the rest of the plate behind it.
  • In its 1996 booklet, USGS called slab pull "the driving force of plate tectonics". Supporting evidence: plates attached to subducting slabs move fastest.
Quick check
?Which force do USGS (1996) and Earle's open textbook treat as the most important in driving the plates?
Mission 1

Subduction and collision

Subduction: depth of earthquake focivolcanic arctrenchCocos PlateCaribbean Plate70 km300 km700 kmCocos underCaribbean: Fuegoshallow focus: 0–70 kmintermediate focus: 70–300 kmdeep focus: 300–700 kmSources: USGS, Determining the depth of an earthquake(depth zones); Oregon State University, Volcano World(plates). Schematic, not to scale; depth lines are spaced inproportion to depth.
  • Subduction: at a convergent margin, a denser oceanic plate sinks into the mantle.
  • Central America: the Cocos Plate subducts beneath the Caribbean Plate, building a line of volcanoes that includes Fuego (Mission 7).
  • Himalaya: when two continents meet, USGS's booklet says "neither is subducted" and the crust crumples in a collision zone. Yet USGS's 2015 Nepal summary calls the India plate "subducting". Terms vary: name your source.
Mission 1

Rifting and spreading

Rifting and spreadingEast African Rift: continental riftingcracks openrift valleystretchedcontinental crustnew spreading centremay be formingMid-Atlantic Ridge through Icelandabout 2.5 cm/yrIcelandNorthAmericanPlateEurasianPlateMid-Atlantic Ridge average spreading rateKrafla, Iceland: rifting opened about 7 m between1975 and 1984.For comparison, the East Pacific Rise spreads at morethan 15 cm/yr.Source: USGS, This Dynamic Earth (rates; Krafla; EastAfrican Rift). Schematic, not to scale.
  • Rifting: when continental crust stretches beyond its limits, cracks open. A new spreading centre may be forming along the East African Rift.
  • Iceland is splitting along the spreading centre between the North American and Eurasian plates. Rifting at Krafla opened about 7 m between 1975 and 1984.
  • Spreading rates: the Mid-Atlantic Ridge averages about 2.5 cm a year; the East Pacific Rise, more than 15 cm a year.
Calculate
?The Mid-Atlantic Ridge spreads at an average of about 2.5 cm a year. How much wider, in metres, is the Atlantic in 2026 than in 1492?
Mission 1

Plumes and hotspots

The Hawaiian hotspot chainPacific Plate movesolder islands are carriedaway from the plumeKauaiabout 5.5 millionyearsBig Island<0.7 million yearsmantle plumemore than 3,200 km to the nearest plate boundaryAges are of the oldest exposed rocks. Plume modeldebated: newer studies suggest hotspots may beneither deep nor fixed.Source: USGS, This Dynamic Earth, Hotspots (ages,distance, debate). Schematic, not to scale.
  • A mantle plume is a column of exceptionally hot material. Where it reaches the base of a plate it feeds a hotspot.
  • Hawaii formed more than 3,200 km from the nearest plate boundary. As the Pacific Plate moves over the hotspot, older islands are carried away: the Big Island's oldest exposed rocks are under 0.7 million years old, Kauai's about 5.5 million.
  • Some hotspots lie near spreading ridges, such as beneath Iceland.
  • The plume model is debated: newer studies suggest hotspots may be neither deep nor fixed.
Quick check
?Hawaii is more than 3,200 km from the nearest plate boundary. Which explanation of its volcanoes fits the evidence?
Mission 1

Where earthquakes and volcanoes cluster

Where earthquakes and volcanoes clusterCircum-Pacific belt: about 81% of the largestearthquakesAlpide belt: about 17%Mid-Atlantic Ridge beltvolcanoes (Smithsonian GVP, Holocene list)plate boundaries (Bird, 2003)USGS gives no magnitude cut-off for "largest". About1,350 potentially active volcanoes, many around thePacific "Ring of Fire" (USGS).Sources: USGS FAQs (81%, 17%, belts; about 1,350volcanoes); Smithsonian GVP (volcano positions); Bird(2003) PB2002 plate boundaries; Natural Earth. Belts areschematic bands around the boundaries.
  • USGS: about 81% of "our planet's largest earthquakes" occur in the circum-Pacific belt, where oceanic plates subduct; about 17% in the Alpide belt (Java to the Himalaya, the Mediterranean and the Atlantic). USGS gives no magnitude cut-off for "largest".
  • A third belt follows the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
  • There are about 1,350 potentially active volcanoes, not counting the belts on ocean-floor spreading centres. Many are around the Pacific "Ring of Fire".
Quick check
?Which statement best describes the global distribution of earthquakes and volcanoes?
Mission 1

Exam move: evaluating the mechanisms

  • USGS: "none of the proposed mechanisms can explain all the facets of plate movement".
  • The forces act too deep to test directly, so present convection, ridge push and slab pull as explanations with different support.
  • Strong answers link each mechanism to a margin and a located example: slab pull at the Cocos subduction zone, rifting in East Africa, a plume under Hawaii.
Mission check

?What moves the plates, so that the Atlantic widens about 2.5 cm a year?
Mission 2

Mission 2: In 1985 a volcano 45 km away killed about 23,000 people in Armero, two hours after it erupted. How?

Make a guess: In 1985 a volcano 45 km away killed about 23,000 people in Armero, two hours after it erupted. How?

Mission 2

Why eruptions differ

  • A magma's composition, viscosity and gas content largely decide how explosive an eruption is.
  • Viscosity is resistance to flow. Silica has the greatest effect on it; most igneous rocks contain about 45–78% silica by weight.
  • Low-viscosity lava flows easily: at Kīlauea, flow fronts move up to 10 km/h.
  • High-viscosity, silica-rich magma does not spread out; it traps gas, so eruptions tend to be explosive.
Mission 2

Shield volcanoes

Three volcano typesFrom shield to composite volcanoessilicaabout 45%about 78%viscosityrunnystickyeruptioneffusiveexplosiveShieldMauna Loa (Hawaii)13,677 ft (about 4,170 m)above sea levelCompositeFuego (Guatemala)up to 8,000 ft (about2,400 m) above its baseCinder coneParícutin (Mexico): cone about 1,200ft (about 370 m) higha small pile of cinders around oneventHeights use different datums, and the profiles are notdrawn to a common vertical scale.Sources: USGS, Principal types of volcanoes (shapes,heights); US National Park Service, Volcanic eruptions(silica 45–78%). Schematic profiles.
  • Built almost entirely of fluid basalt lava flows, spreading widely to form a broad, gently sloping cone "like that of a warrior's shield".
  • Mauna Loa (Hawaii) is the largest shield volcano and the world's largest active volcano: 13,677 feet (about 4,170 m) above sea level.
  • Eruptions are mainly effusive: lava flows rather than explosions.
Mission 2

Composite volcanoes (stratovolcanoes)

  • Steep-sided, symmetrical cones built of alternating layers of lava flows, ash, cinders, blocks and bombs.
  • They may rise as much as 8,000 feet (about 2,400 m) above their bases.
  • Viscous magma makes many eruptions explosive. Nevado del Ruiz (Colombia) and Fuego (Guatemala) are stratovolcanoes.
Mission 2

Cinder cones

  • The simplest type: blobs of gas-charged lava blown from a single vent fall back as cinders around it.
  • Parícutin (Mexico) started growing on a farm in 1943 and built a cone about 1,200 feet (about 370 m) high.
  • It was active for 9 years. Cinder cones are usually small and short-lived.
Quick check
?A volcano has broad, gentle slopes built of thousands of thin basalt lava flows. Which type is it?
Mission 2

Measuring eruption size: the VEI

The VEI ladderVolcanic Explosivity Index (VEI)Each step is about 10 times the volume of ash of thestep below (VEI 1 is the exception).012345678open-endedlarger ash volumeMost Hawaiian eruptions: VEI 0–1VEI 5, such as Mount St Helens in 1980: about 1km³ of ashStep heights show order only, not the real volumes.Source: USGS Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, VolcanicExplosivity Index (26 Dec 2022).
  • The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) starts at 0 (non-explosive); 8 is the top of the usual scale, though USGS calls it open-ended.
  • Each step is about 10 times the volume of ash, except VEI 1.
  • A VEI 5 eruption, such as Mount St Helens in 1980, may release about 1 km³ of ash.
  • Most eruptions in Hawaii rate VEI 0 or 1.
Mission 2

Secondary hazard 1: pyroclastic flows

Secondary hazards of a stratovolcanostratovolcanopyroclastic flowlaharflank collapsePyroclastic flow: more than 80 km/h, 200–700 °CLahar (volcanic mudflow): more than 200 km/hon steep slopes; can grow more than 10 timesFlank collapse: a landslide that can travel as adebris avalancheSources: USGS Volcano Hazards Program (pyroclasticflows, lahars); Highland and Bobrowsky (2008), USGSCircular 1325 (landslides). Schematic, not to scale.
  • Avalanches of hot rock fragments and gas that typically travel at more than 80 km/h.
  • Temperatures are generally 200–700 °C.
  • They knock down, shatter, bury or carry away nearly everything in their path.
  • Their speed means evacuation before they start is the only reliable protection.
Mission 2

Secondary hazard 2: lahars

  • Lahars are volcanic mudflows: a slurry of debris and water that looks like wet concrete.
  • The water can come from melting snow and ice, heavy rain, or lakes and rivers.
  • They often grow to more than 10 times their initial size, and can exceed 200 km/h on steep slopes.
  • The hazard outlasts the eruption: after Fuego's 2018 eruption, heavy rains produced many lahars in the valleys.
Mission 2

Secondary hazard 3: volcanic landslides

  • Volcano flanks can collapse. Mount St Helens' 1980 eruption triggered "the largest landslide in recorded times".
  • Volcanic activity can make a slope fail as a "hot" debris avalanche, which can travel close to 100 m/s.
  • Debris avalanches can turn into lahars that travel "many tens of kilometers farther downstream".
Quick check
?A town lies in a river valley 40 km below a glacier-capped stratovolcano. Which hazard from an eruption poses the greatest threat to it?
Mission 2

Armero, 1985: the event

Nevado del Ruiz and Armero45 kmNevado del Ruiz5,389 m, glacier capArmerobuilt on old lahardepositsLagunillas riverN10 kmLate on 13 November 1985about 2 hoursEruptionLahar reachesArmeroSource: USGS HVO, Volcano Watch, 29 Oct 2009 (height,45 km, two hours). Positions: Smithsonian GVP; Map:OpenStreetMap contributors. Arrow is schematic.
  • Nevado del Ruiz is a glacier-topped stratovolcano, 5,389 m high.
  • Late on 13 November 1985 an explosive eruption, hidden by a storm, melted ice and sent lahars racing down the river valleys.
  • Armero, built on old lahar deposits 45 km from the volcano, was hit about two hours after the eruption.
  • Within minutes about 23,000 people, most of the town, were killed. The eruption killed more than 25,000 in all.
Mission 2

Armero: why so many died (AO3)

  • Physical: ice melt and steep valleys funnelled the lahars to the town.
  • Monitoring: Colombian scientists lacked the expertise, government support and equipment to monitor the volcano.
  • Governance: guerrilla fighting had broken out in Bogotá, and to the government the unstable political situation was "more pressing".
  • Communication: earlier that evening the mayor and priest had told residents they were safe for the night. USGS: two hours was "plenty of time" to reach higher ground.
  • When Pinatubo (Philippines) awoke in 1991, the whole volcanological community responded, and a disaster like Armero's was averted.
Mission check

?How did a volcano 45 km away kill about 23,000 people in Armero two hours after it erupted?
Mission 3

Mission 3: The central and eastern USA used to have about 25 earthquakes of magnitude 3 or more a year. In 2015 it had 1,010. What changed?

Make a guess: The central and eastern USA used to have about 25 earthquakes of magnitude 3 or more a year. In 2015 it had 1,010. What changed?

Mission 3

Focus, epicentre and depth

Focus, epicentre and depth of focusvolcanic arctrenchCocos PlateCaribbean Plate70 km300 km700 kmCocos underCaribbean: Fuegoepicentrefocus(hypocentre)shallow focus: 0–70 kmintermediate focus: 70–300 kmdeep focus: 300–700 kmSources: USGS, Determining the depth of an earthquake(depth zones); Oregon State University, Volcano World(plates). Schematic, not to scale; depth lines are spaced inproportion to depth.
  • The focus (hypocentre) is where the rupture starts underground. The epicentre is the point on the surface directly above it.
  • Depth of focus: shallow 0–70 km, intermediate 70–300 km, deep 300–700 km.
  • Earthquakes deeper than 70 km all occur within slabs sinking into the mantle.
  • Shallow earthquakes usually do more damage, because the energy is released close to the surface.
Quick check
?Two earthquakes have the same magnitude. One is 600 km deep beneath a subduction zone; the other is 10 km deep. Which is more likely to damage buildings above it?
Mission 3

Seismic waves

Seismogram showing P, S and surface wavesOne earthquake on a seismogramPSSurface wavesS–P intervaltimeP waves: compressional, the fastest, so they arrivefirstS waves: shear waves, slower than P; they cannottravel through liquidsSurface waves: the slowest, but often the largestground motionSchematic trace: order and relative size of the waves only;the time axis has no scale. Sources: USGS, Two kinds ofwaves are generated by earthquakes; British GeologicalSurvey, How are earthquakes detected?
  • P waves (primary): compressional, the fastest, so they arrive first; 5–7 km/s in typical crust.
  • S waves (secondary): shear waves, about 60% of P-wave speed (3–4 km/s in crust). They cannot travel through liquids.
  • Surface waves (Love and Rayleigh): the slowest, but their ground motions are often much larger, and they cause buildings to fail.
Calculate
?In typical crust, take P waves at 6.0 km/s and S waves at 3.5 km/s (within the ranges on screen 3.3). At a seismometer the S wave arrives 20 seconds after the P wave. How far away is the earthquake, in km?
Mission 3

How plate margins make earthquakes

Fault types at plate marginsThree types of faultThrust (reverse) faultConvergent marginThe upper block moves upand over the lower one.Example: Nepal, 2015Normal faultDivergent marginThe upper block movesdown.Example: Iceland, on theMid-Atlantic RidgeStrike-slip faultTransform marginBlocks slide past eachother sideways.Example: New Zealand’sSouth IslandSchematic block diagrams. Sources: USGS, What is a faultand what are the different types?; USGS, Where doearthquakes occur?; USGS event pages for Nepal 2015and Kaikōura 2016.
  • Convergent margins: thrust (reverse) faults, where the upper block moves up and over the lower one. Nepal 2015 was thrust faulting between India and Eurasia.
  • Divergent margins: normal faults, where the upper block moves down. Iceland, on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, has had earthquakes "as large as at least M6.9".
  • Transform margins: strike-slip faults, where blocks slide past each other. New Zealand's South Island boundary is mainly transform faulting.
Mission 3

Magnitude and intensity

  • Magnitude measures the size of the earthquake and does not depend on distance. Each whole number up means 10 times the measured amplitude and about 32 times the energy.
  • USGS uses moment magnitude (Mw); Richter's scale is now used mainly for small, local earthquakes.
  • Intensity describes the effects of shaking at a place, and usually falls with distance. The US uses the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale.
  • Agencies can differ: Nepal's National Seismological Centre recorded the 2015 earthquake as 7.6; USGS gives Mw 7.8. Name the source.
Calculate
?Using about 32 times the energy for each whole step in magnitude, how many times as much energy does an M7.8 earthquake release as an M5.8?
Mission 3

Human triggers 1: dams and reservoirs

  • A large reservoir loads the crust and raises water pressure in rocks below, which can trigger slip on faults that are already stressed.
  • The Koyna Dam in western India has been seismically active since its reservoir was filled in 1962.
  • In 1967 an M6.3 earthquake there "claimed 200 human lives" and damaged the dam.
  • Bursts of M5 earthquakes followed in 1973, 1980 and 1993–95. In the latest, activity tracked water levels in both reservoirs, more in the new Warna reservoir.
Mission 3

Human triggers 2: resource extraction

Earthquakes of M3 and larger in the central and eastern USA, and in OklahomaEarthquakes of magnitude 3 and largerCentral and eastern USA, per year. Dashed line: 25 ayear, the 1973–2008 average.25Average1973–20081,01020151302019Oklahoma, M3+ per year412010632011342012103201358520148882015USGS count, March 2016Sources: USGS, Induced earthquakes overview (USGSgives these years in text; its own chart shows every year);USGS, Lists, maps, and statistics (Oklahoma, as of March2016).
  • Oil production brings up waste fluids, which are injected deep underground. USGS: the increase in the central USA is "primarily caused by disposal of waste fluids", not by fracking itself.
  • In Oklahoma, about 2% of earthquakes can be linked to hydraulic fracturing; the rest are induced by wastewater disposal.
  • Oklahoma's M3+ earthquakes: 41 in 2010, 585 in 2014, 888 in 2015 (USGS count, March 2016).
  • The M5.8 Pawnee earthquake (Oklahoma, 2016) is the largest induced by wastewater disposal (Moschetti et al., 2019, listed by USGS).
Quick check
?The central and eastern USA had 1,010 M3+ earthquakes in 2015 and 130 in 2019. What best explains the start of the fall?
Mission 3

Secondary hazard: tsunami

Tsunami generation by seafloor upliftHow a tsunami startsWave spreads outsea levelold seafloorWater columnliftedFault moves:seafloor pushed upfaultcoastKaikōura 2016First wave within 10 min;6.9 m run-up at Goose BaySchematic cross-section, not to scale. Kaikōura values:GeoNet, M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake.
  • When a fault under the sea moves the seafloor up or down, the water above is displaced: a tsunami.
  • 2004, Indian Ocean (M9.1): USGS's event page gives more than 283,100 killed and 14,100 missing in 10 countries; its FAQ says the tsunami "killed over 230,000 people". Tolls differ by source and date.
  • Kaikōura 2016: offshore faults ruptured; the first wave arrived within 10 minutes, with a 6.9 m run-up at Goose Bay.
Mission 3

Secondary hazard: landslides

  • Shaking triggers landslides on steep slopes: at least 25,000 in Nepal in 2015; over 10,000 at Kaikōura in 2016.
  • At Kaikōura, more than 200 landslides dammed rivers.
Mission 3

Secondary hazard: liquefaction

Liquefaction before and after strong shakingLiquefaction: before and afterBefore shakingLoose sand, soaked withwater: the grains toucheach other.In strong shakingWater separates the grainsand the ground losesstrength:the house tilts and sinksthe buried pipe floats upSchematic cross-sections, not to scale. Effects:UNDRR/ISC Hazard Information Profile GH0307,Liquefaction.
  • Liquefaction: loosely packed, saturated sediments lose strength in strong shaking.
  • Buildings may sink or crack, and buried pipes can float up.
  • Christchurch: in March 2012 the government rezoned 251 properties in Central City South, Linwood and Richmond South to red, saying "there has been widespread liquefaction" there. Mission 9 shows what happened to the red-zoned land.
Quick check
?Which ground is most at risk of liquefaction in an earthquake?
Mission check

?Why did the central and eastern USA go from about 25 M3+ earthquakes a year to 1,010 in 2015?
Mission 4

Mission 4: About 1,600 magnitude-5 earthquakes strike each year, and about one magnitude-8. Which should planners prepare for?

Make a guess: About 1,600 magnitude-5 earthquakes strike each year, and about one magnitude-8. Which should planners prepare for?

Mission 4

Magnitude and frequency

Average earthquakes per year by magnitude, log scaleEarthquakes per year, by magnitudeAverage per year, 2000–2021; log scale0.11101001,00010,0001,613M5–5.9137M6–6.914M7–7.91.2M8 ormoreEach gridline is ten times the one below. Bars start at0.1, not zero.Log scale. Averages calculated from USGS, Lists, maps,and statistics (worldwide earthquakes 2000–2021).
  • Small events are far more frequent than large ones. Averages calculated from USGS counts for 2000–2021: about 1,613 earthquakes of M5–5.9 a year, 137 of M6–6.9, 14 of M7–7.9 and 1.2 of M8 or more.
  • Over the long term (since about 1900), USGS expects about 15 M7 earthquakes and one M8 or larger each year.
  • On a log scale the counts fall steadily as magnitude rises: the magnitude–frequency relationship.
Mission 4

Recurrence intervals

  • The recurrence (return) interval is the average time between events of a given size in a place.
  • A "1-in-100-year" event has a 1% chance of happening in any year. It can happen two years running.
  • Volcanoes follow the same pattern: each VEI step means about ten times as much ash, and the largest eruptions are the rarest.
Calculate
?An event has a 1-in-100 (1%) chance of happening in any year. What is the chance, as a percentage, that it happens at least once in 50 years?
Mission 4

Designing for rare events

  • USGS hazard maps show the shaking that has a 10% or a 2% chance of being exceeded in 50 years.
  • These correspond to return periods of about 475 years and 2,475 years (calculated: 1 − (1 − 1/475)⁵⁰ ≈ 10%).
  • Planners choose a level of risk to accept: for example, a hospital may be built for rarer, stronger shaking than a garage.
Quick check
?A hazard map shows shaking with "a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years". What does this mean?
Mission 4

Rare events cause most deaths

Estimated earthquake deaths per year, 2000 to 2019Estimated earthquake deaths per yearUSGS list, 2000–2019; 2004 and 2010 highlighted2000201920152004298,1012010226,050Haiti tolldisputedAll other years: 689 to88,708Source: USGS, Lists, maps, and statistics (2016–2019from EM-DAT). Haiti 2010: USGS event page, M7.0 Haiti.
  • In USGS's list for 2000–2019, two years made up about 65% of all earthquake deaths: 2004 (298,101, all earthquakes that year) and 2010 (226,050), out of 808,717.
  • The 2010 total rests on Haiti's disputed toll: officially 316,000, but USGS notes other estimates "as low as fewer than 100,000".
  • Haiti was an M7.0, a size that happens about 14 times a year: rare in impact, not in magnitude.
  • UNDRR: risk models tuned to the largest events often miss "smaller, often recurrent and in sum equally damaging events".
Quick check
?A city uses USGS-style hazard maps. Which building is most worth designing for the rarer 2% in 50 years (about 2,475-year) shaking, rather than the 10% level?
Mission 4

Showing magnitude and frequency (skills)

Risk matrix of likelihood against impactA risk matrixM8 near a cityfast debris flowslow landslideM5 felt locallycatastrophicminorImpactrarefrequentLikelihoodGeneric skills diagram: positions are qualitative only, notdata.
  • A logarithmic scale fits counts from 1 to 1,600 on one axis.
  • A risk matrix plots likelihood against impact. Rare, high-impact events sit in one corner; frequent, low-impact events in the other.
  • Exam move: label the scale and name the data source and years on any graph you draw.
Mission check

?About 1,600 M5 and about one M8 strike each year. Which should planners prepare for?
Mission 5

Mission 5: In one Aceh village, the 2004 tsunami killed four females for every male. Why would a wave "choose"?

Make a guess: In one Aceh village, the 2004 tsunami killed four females for every male. Why would a wave "choose"?

Mission 5

Hazard, exposure and risk

Hazard, exposure, vulnerability and capacity determine riskWhat determines disaster riskDisasterriskHazardthe process that may causeharm+Exposurepeople and assets in harm’sway+Vulnerabilityconditions that increasesusceptibility to harm+Capacitystrengths and resources tomanage and reduce risk−raises risklowers riskA way of thinking, not a formula to calculate. Terms:UNDRR Terminology (disaster risk, vulnerability, capacity).
  • A hazard is the process that may cause harm: shaking, a lahar, a debris flow.
  • Exposure: the people and assets in harm's way.
  • UNDRR: disaster risk is "the potential loss of life, injury, or destroyed or damaged assets", determined "as a function of hazard, exposure, vulnerability and capacity".
Mission 5

Vulnerability, capacity and resilience

  • Vulnerability: conditions "which increase the susceptibility" of people or assets to a hazard.
  • Capacity: "the strengths, attributes and resources" available to manage and reduce disaster risk.
  • Resilience: the ability to "resist, absorb, accommodate, adapt to, transform and recover".
  • Shorthand: risk = hazard × exposure × vulnerability ÷ capacity. It is a way of thinking, not a formula to calculate.
Quick check
?Two towns of the same size face the same earthquake hazard. In Town X, a larger share of families live in unreinforced brick houses. What is different about Town X?
Mission 5

Economic factors

  • Development pays for building codes, monitoring and warning systems.
  • UNDRR (all disaster types, 2000–2019): low-income countries had 23% of disaster deaths but under 10% of the world's population, and the most deaths per event (284).
  • High-income countries had 67% of economic losses, US$1.99 trillion.
  • Richer places tend to lose more money; poorer places lose more lives.
Mission 5

Social factors: education

  • Education: people who know the warning signs and what to do can act sooner.
  • A review of eleven studies found "consistent and robust evidence" that formal education reduces vulnerability.
  • Countries with a higher share of women with at least secondary education suffered lower disaster mortality.
Mission 5

Social factors: gender

Who died: gender in Aceh and Cuddalore, age in JapanWho died: gender and ageGender: Indian Ocean tsunami, 2004Kuala Cangkoy (Aceh)4 female deaths per maleCuddalore (India): deathsFemale391Male146Age: Japan, 2011People over 60Share of the affected area’s population (1 Sep 2011)about 31%Share of the dead (counted by 11 Apr 2011)about 65%Each pale track is 100% of that group.Sources: Oxfam (2005), The tsunami’s impact on women;Cabinet Office, Japan, White Paper on DisasterManagement 2011.
  • Oxfam, 2005: in Kuala Cangkoy (Aceh), four females died for every male. In Cuddalore (India), 391 women died, against 146 men.
  • Oxfam's explanations: many women stayed behind to look for their children; men more often than women can swim or climb trees.
  • In Aceh the wave struck on a Sunday morning, when women were at home and the men were away from the seafront.
Calculate
?In Cuddalore, 391 women and 146 men died. What percentage of these deaths were female?
Mission 5

Demographic factors

  • Density: more people in a hazard zone means more exposure.
  • Age structure: in Japan's 2011 earthquake and tsunami, people over 60 were about 31% of the affected area's population (1 September 2011) but about 65% of the dead (counted by 11 April 2011). (Second panel of D20.)
  • Children, older people and disabled people may need help to evacuate.
Mission 5

Political factors: governance

  • Governance shapes monitoring, warnings, building rules and land use.
  • Armero, 1985: a government focused on political unrest, and an under-resourced monitoring team.
  • Freetown, 2017: the World Bank assessment describes "highly fragmented governance" and an unclear legal status for land and building permits.
Quick check
?Which of these is a political factor in hazard risk?
Mission 5

Geographic factors: place, time and isolation

  • Rural or urban: in Nepal (2015), poorer rural areas were hit harder than towns and cities because their houses were weaker.
  • Time of day: Nepal's earthquake struck on a Saturday, when schools were closed, at midday. The government's assessment says a night-time quake would "certainly" have killed more.
  • Isolation: road damage cut off rural Nepal; landslides cut Kaikōura's road and rail links.
Quick check
?Why did the timing of the 2015 Nepal earthquake reduce deaths among young people?
Mission 5

Synthesis: models of vulnerability

PAR and Degg models of vulnerabilityTwo textbook models of vulnerabilityPressure and Release (PAR) model, Blaikie et al.,1994Root causesDynamic pressuresUnsafe conditionsDisasterHazardRelease:reduce the pressures ateach stageDegg’s model, 1992HazardDisasterVulnerablepopulationA disaster happens only where a hazard overlaps avulnerable population.Textbook models, simplified: Blaikie, Cannon, Davis andWisner (1994); Degg (1992).
  • Pressure and Release (PAR) model (Blaikie, Cannon, Davis and Wisner, 1994): vulnerability builds from root causes (limited access to power and resources), through dynamic pressures (lack of training, rapid urbanisation), to unsafe conditions (fragile housing on dangerous land), and meets a hazard.
  • Reducing the pressures at each stage "releases" vulnerability.
  • Degg's model (1992): a disaster happens only where a hazard overlaps a vulnerable population.
  • Strength: both show risk comes from human as well as physical processes. Limitation: the pressures are hard to measure.
  • Exam move: the guide asks how risk comes from "spatial interactions between different human and physical processes". Link both sides with a located example.
Mission check

?Why did the tsunami kill four females for every male in Kuala Cangkoy?
Mission 6

Mission 6: Nepal 2015 and Kaikōura 2016 were both magnitude 7.8. One killed more than 8,790 people; the other killed 2. Why?

Make a guess: Nepal 2015 and Kaikōura 2016 were both magnitude 7.8. One killed more than 8,790 people; the other killed 2. Why?

Mission 6

Nepal, 25 April 2015: event profile

Nepal earthquake 2015: epicentre and district losses per personNepal, 25 April 20151234567891011121314EpicentrenearBarpak(Gorkha)Kathmandurupture spreads eastNDisaster effects per person, NPR: the 14most-affected districts (PDNA)43,800255,860Districts 1 to 6: the six lowest-HDI districts witheffects above NPR 130,000 per personEpicentre to Kathmandu: about 76 km (Nepal’sassessment); USGS says about 80 km1Dolakha255,8602Sindhupalchowk233,3703Gorkha209,0804Nuwakot204,9305Rasuwa179,7006Dhading149,5807Kavrepalanchowk119,2008Ramechhap112,7409Bhaktapur78,77010Okhaldhunga74,50011Sindhuli57,86512Lalitpur52,76513Kathmandu49,49514Makawanpur43,760Sources: PDNA Table 2 (National Planning Commission,2015); USGS event page, M7.8 Gorkha (epicentre);geoBoundaries (districts); Natural Earth. Rupture arrow isschematic. The PDNA table gives Makawanpur as 43,760;its text rounds to 43,800.
  • Mw 7.8 (USGS) on Saturday 25 April at 11:56 local time. The epicentre was near Barpak, Gorkha district, about 76 km north-west of Kathmandu (Nepal's assessment; USGS says about 80 km).
  • Thrust faulting where India converges with Eurasia at about 45 mm a year; the focus was about 8 km deep.
  • The rupture spread east, towards Kathmandu, so strong shaking reached the city.
  • Aftershocks included an M7.3 on 12 May.
Mission 6

Nepal: secondary hazards

  • At least 25,000 landslides across the steep Himalaya, mapped from satellite images.
  • In Langtang, an avalanche mostly of snow, followed by rockfalls, destroyed the village.
  • An avalanche killed 20 people at Everest Base Camp.
  • Weakened slopes left the region more prone to landslides and floods in the monsoon.
Mission 6

Nepal: impacts on well-being

  • Over 8,790 deaths and 22,300 injuries by June 2015. The lives of about 8 million people, almost a third of the population, were affected.
  • Over half a million houses destroyed; nearly 7,000 schools completely or significantly damaged.
  • Damage and losses: about US$7 billion, equal to about one-third of GDP (2013–14). The World Bank estimated at least 700,000 more people would fall into poverty.
  • Data: USGS lists at least 8,669 killed and 384 missing in the earthquake and the 12 May aftershock; UNDRR's EM-DAT figure is 8,969. Counts differ by date and source.
Mission 6

Nepal: why vulnerability varied

  • Between communities: poorer rural areas were hit harder than towns and cities; the damage exposed houses that "did not have any seismic-resistant features".
  • The six lowest-HDI districts with high losses per person included Sindhupalchowk, Gorkha and Dolakha.
  • Within communities: more women and girls died than men and boys, partly because of gendered roles that kept women indoors.
  • Isolation: road damage further isolated rural areas in the central and western regions.
Mission 6

Nepal: perception and preparedness

  • Nepal had no integrated national search-and-rescue capacity before 2015, but trained army and police teams carried out rescue.
  • Fear of being trapped drove many families, even with undamaged homes, to sleep in the open.
  • Neighbours, especially young people, dug others out of the rubble.
Quick check
?Which evidence best shows vulnerability varying within communities in Nepal?
Mission 6

Kaikōura, 14 November 2016: event profile

Kaikōura earthquake 2016: ruptured faults and effectsKaikōura, 14 November 2016Rupture started nearWaiauKaikōuraGoose Bay: 6.9 mtsunami run-upŌhau Point: SH1blockedHāpuku Riverlandslide damCape CampbellN25 kmRuptured faults (main traces, simplified): morethan 20 faults; the rupture ran about 180 kmsouth-west to north-east in nearly 2 minutesState Highway 1Main railway lineUplifted coast near Kaikōura Peninsula; verticalchange on the coast varied from −2.5 m to +6.5 mSources: GeoNet, M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake (faults,landslides, uplift range, tsunami); NZHistory (road and railcut); fault traces: Xu et al. (2018) model, simplified; upliftstretch: NASA Earth Observatory; Natural Earth;OpenStreetMap contributors. The dam position on theHāpuku River is approximate.
  • Mw 7.8 at 12:02 a.m. on Monday 14 November; the focus was about 15 km deep.
  • Oblique-reverse faulting at the boundary between the Pacific and Australia plates, which move about 40 mm a year relative to each other.
  • The rupture "unzipped" about 180 km of coast in nearly 2 minutes. More than 20 faults ruptured, a world record.
Mission 6

Kaikōura: secondary hazards

  • Over 10,000 landslides; more than 200 of them dammed rivers.
  • Coastal uplift of up to 6.5 m.
  • Tsunami: a 6.9 m run-up at Goose Bay.
Mission 6

Kaikōura: impacts and recovery

  • Two deaths: one from a heart attack at Mt Lyford, one when a homestead collapsed in Kaikōura.
  • Landslides cut road and rail links, stranding many visitors in the town. Rail reopened in September 2017 and State Highway 1 in December 2017, about 10 and 13 months later.
  • About 40,000 claims for building, contents or land damage went to the Earthquake Commission (now the Natural Hazards Commission).
  • Scale: the quake triggered slow-slip events on the Hikurangi subduction zone up to about 600 km away.
Mission 6

Comparing the two (AO3)

Nepal 2015Kaikōura 2016
Magnitude, depthMw 7.8, about 8 kmMw 7.8, about 15 km
Local timeSaturday 11:56Monday 00:02
Deathsover 8,7902
Landslidesat least 25,000over 10,000
  • Buildings: many Nepali houses had no seismic-resistant features. New Zealand's Building Code requires that buildings "withstand likely loads, including wind, earthquake".
  • Exposure: the Nepal rupture spread towards Kathmandu and its valley.
  • Recovery capacity: New Zealand homeowners had state hazard insurance.
Quick check
?Kaikōura's tsunami reached a 6.9 m run-up at Goose Bay, yet did little damage along the Kaikōura coast. Why?
Mission check

?Both earthquakes were Mw 7.8. Why did Nepal's kill more than 8,790 people and Kaikōura's kill 2?
Mission 7

Mission 7: On Fuego, in 2018, a golf resort evacuated safely. A village two kilometres further on was buried. Why?

Make a guess: On Fuego, in 2018, a golf resort evacuated safely. A village two kilometres further on was buried. Why?

Mission 7

Two plate boundaries

Focus, epicentre and depth of focusvolcanic arctrenchCocos PlateCaribbean Plate70 km300 km700 kmCocos underCaribbean: Fuegoepicentrefocus(hypocentre)shallow focus: 0–70 kmintermediate focus: 70–300 kmdeep focus: 300–700 kmSources: USGS, Determining the depth of an earthquake(depth zones); Oregon State University, Volcano World(plates). Schematic, not to scale; depth lines are spaced inproportion to depth.
The Hawaiian hotspot chainPacific Plate movesolder islands are carriedaway from the plumeKauaiabout 5.5 millionyearsBig Island<0.7 million yearsmantle plumemore than 3,200 km to the nearest plate boundaryAges are of the oldest exposed rocks. Plume modeldebated: newer studies suggest hotspots may beneither deep nor fixed.Source: USGS, This Dynamic Earth, Hotspots (ages,distance, debate). Schematic, not to scale.
  • Fuego, Guatemala: a stratovolcano in the Central American arc, where the Cocos Plate subducts beneath the Caribbean Plate (convergent).
  • Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland: where the Mid-Atlantic Ridge rises above sea level; a rift zone on oceanic crust (divergent).
  • Expect explosive eruptions and pyroclastic flows at Fuego, and effusive fissure eruptions of runny lava at Reykjanes (Mission 2).
Mission 7

Fuego, 3 June 2018: event profile

Fuego, 3 June 2018: places and timelineFuego, south-east flankFuego summitLas LajasbridgeLa Reunión golfresortSan MiguelLos Lotesabout 2 kmLas LajasravineRN-14 roadN1 km3 June 2018, local time10:00first pyroclastic flows13:10activity peaks; column 16–19 km high15:05first big pulse begins15:09pulse reaches the Las Lajas bridge andoverflows onto RN-14Sources: Charbonnier et al. (2023), JVGR 436 (times,places); Naismith et al. (2020), Volcanica (2 km). Map:OpenStreetMap contributors. Flow arrows are schematic.
  • The first pyroclastic flows came at 10:00. Explosive activity peaked at about 13:10, with a column 16–19 km high.
  • The first big pulse began at 15:05 and reached the Las Lajas bridge at 15:09, overflowing onto the RN-14 road towards San Miguel Los Lotes.
  • About 15.1 million m³ of pyroclastic flow material was deposited in Las Lajas (Albino et al., 2020, cited in S41): more than double the average since 1999.
  • In the rainy weeks that followed, rain produced many lahars.
Mission 7

Fuego: impacts on well-being

  • About two-thirds of the north-western part of San Miguel Los Lotes suffered "total inundation, destruction, and burial" by the flows.
  • An estimated 5,000 people lost their homes.
  • The death toll is uncertain. Official counts of the missing differ: 332 (Naismith et al., 2020) and 430 (Charbonnier et al., 2023, whose abstract says "at least 430" were killed). Survivors' estimates are far higher.
Quick check
?Two research papers give 332 and 430 people officially missing at Fuego, and survivors' estimates are far higher. What should an exam answer do?
Mission 7

Fuego: vulnerability between communities

  • The private golf resort of La Reunión evacuated successfully; Los Lotes, about two kilometres further south, suffered extensive loss of life.
  • The researchers found that La Reunión had "a culture of preventative self-evacuation".
  • They call the residents' idea that wealth decided who survived "debatable".
  • Separately, communities on Fuego's west and east flanks differed in their past experience of eruptions and in their communication with the monitoring and civil protection agencies.
Mission 7

Fuego: perception and self-evacuation

  • Scientists issued information from 06:30, and authorities "persistently tried to remove people from high-risk areas".
  • But authorities expected residents to recognise changes in the volcano and evacuate themselves. Locals weighed security fears and livelihoods.
  • Perception: residents clearly remember only eruptions that disrupted daily life. Smaller flows had triggered evacuations in 2012 and 2017.
Quick check
?Fuego residents clearly remember only the eruptions that disrupted daily life. What does this show about hazard perception?
Mission 7

Reykjanes, 2023–24: event profile

Grindavík and Svartsengi: crater row, barriers and 14 January lavaGrindavík and Svartsengi, 2023–24GrindavíkSvartsengipower plant14 Jan 2024: lavaat edge of townSundhnúkurcrater rowLava barriersN2 kmSvartsengi, before 10 November 2023From 27 October the groundrose as magma accumulatedbeneath.On 10 November it forced adike under the crater row andGrindavík.Sources: Icelandic Met Office; NASA Earth Observatory(Jan 2024); Smithsonian GVP; IFRC. Positions and barriers:OpenStreetMap contributors, generalised; the lava markeris schematic and approximate. The inset is a sketch: novalues.
  • From 27 October 2023, magma accumulated beneath Svartsengi and the ground rose; on 10 November it forced a dike beneath the Sundhnúkur crater row and Grindavík.
  • The town of 3,700 people was evacuated the same day (IFRC; the Global Volcanism Program gives about 4,000).
  • By December 2023 the IFRC reported that half the town had dropped by more than a metre.
  • Fissure eruptions followed from December 2023. On 14 January 2024 a fissure opened at the edge of town and its lava burned three homes.
Mission 7

Reykjanes: responses and impacts

  • Barriers of earth and rock, built from November 2023, diverted some lava away from Grindavík and the Svartsengi power plant.
  • Iceland's Natural Catastrophe Insurance (NTÍ) covers damage to buildings from volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and landslides.
  • Under a 2024 law (Act 16/2024), the state company Þórkatla offered to buy residents' homes; by 27 March 2024 it had 546 applications.
  • The cost to well-being: a whole community displaced from its homes, schools and harbour town.
Quick check
?Which Icelandic response builds financial resilience for households?
Mission 7

Comparing the two (AO3)

Fuego 2018Reykjanes 2023–24
Plate settingconvergent (subduction)divergent (rift)
Main hazardfast pyroclastic flowsslower fissure lava
Evacuationlargely left to residentsordered weeks before eruptions
Homesabout 5,000 people lost homesthree burned on 14 Jan 2024, plus ground-deformation damage across the town
  • Hazard: Fuego's flows spilled from their channel; Reykjanes' lava was slow enough to divert.
  • Capacity: Iceland had insurance and a state buy-out; at Fuego, the documented capacity gap is in evacuation practice and communication.
  • Exam move: the plate setting explains the type of hazard; development and governance explain the impact.
Mission check

?Why did La Reunión evacuate safely while San Miguel Los Lotes, two kilometres further on, was buried?
Mission 8

Mission 8: In 2017 a hillside above Freetown collapsed; about 1,141 people were declared dead or missing. A Californian landslide has been moving since 1956 and is still destroying homes. Are they the same hazard?

Make a guess: In 2017 a hillside above Freetown collapsed; about 1,141 people were declared dead or missing. A Californian landslide has been moving since 1956 and is still destroying homes. Are they the same hazard?

Mission 8

Classifying mass movement

  • Mass movement: rock, soil or debris moving downslope under gravity, by falling, toppling, sliding, spreading or flowing.
  • Varnes' classification sorts them by type of movement and by material:
MovementBedrockCoarse debrisFine earth
Fallrock falldebris fallearth fall
Sliderock slidedebris slideearth slide
Flowrock flow (deep creep)debris flowearth flow (soil creep)
  • A complex landslide combines two or more types.
Mission 8

Liquidity and speed of onset

Landslide types by speed and water contentLandslide types: speed and water contentSpeed (log scale) against water contentclose to 100 m/s (debris avalanche)under 1 m per decadeRockfallSlideCreepEarthflowDebris flowMudflowdrysaturatedWater contentSchematic: positions are qualitative. End values: USGSCircular 1325, The landslide handbook; classes: USGSFact Sheet 2004-3072.
  • Liquidity: from dry falls to saturated flows. A debris flow is loose soil, rock, organic matter, air and water moving as a slurry.
  • A mudflow is wet enough to flow rapidly and is at least 50% sand, silt and clay.
  • Speed: creep is "imperceptibly slow", usually under 1 m per decade. Debris flows are "rapid to extremely rapid": USGS gives 56 km/h as an example, depending on consistency and slope. Debris avalanches can travel close to 100 m/s.
Mission 8

Cause, duration, extent and frequency

  • Physical causes: weak or weathered rock, erosion of the slope's toe, saturation by rain or snowmelt, earthquakes.
  • Human causes: excavation, loading the slope, deforestation, irrigation, mining, leaking water pipes, lowering reservoirs.
  • Duration: from seconds (a rockfall) to decades (creep). Frequency: some slopes fail every wet season; others once in centuries.
  • Extent: from one boulder to tens of square kilometres of creep.
Quick check
?After heavy rain, a saturated slurry of mud and boulders rushes down a gully. How is it classified?
Mission 8

Where fatal landslides happen

Where fatal non-seismic landslides happened, 2004 to 2016Fatal landslides, 2004–2016Asia: 75% of events11050events in a map cellSource: Froude and Petley (2018), NHESS 18. Plotted:4,415 events from the study’s published map layers(rainfall, construction, hill-cutting and mining triggers);the study counts 4,862 fatal events. Natural Earth.
  • From 2004 to 2016, 4,862 fatal non-seismic landslides killed 55,997 people.
  • Asia had 75% of these events: along the Himalayan Arc, in India and south-eastern China, Indonesia and the Philippines. Other clusters were in Central and South America and East Africa.
  • Most were triggered by rain. The authors report that landslides triggered by human activity (construction, illegal mining, hill cutting) are increasing, but they ascribe part of the rise in their record to "improved event capture".
Mission 8

Freetown, Sierra Leone, 14 August 2017: event profile

Freetown landslide: Sugar Loaf, Regent and the river channelFreetown landslide, 14 August 2017Sugar LoafRegentLumleydebris flow down theriver channelN1 kmDebris corridor: 7 km (path follows the riverchannel)Rainfall before the slide1,040 mm1 Jul14 Aug 2017Morning of 14 August 2017 (not to scale)About 6:50 a.m.lower slope belowSugar Loaf slipsAbout 10 minutes latera “more destructivestage” followsSource: Government of Sierra Leone and WorldBank/GFDRR (2017), Rapid damage and loss assessment.Positions, river channel and coast: OpenStreetMapcontributors; the corridor line is a schematic path alongthe mapped channel.
  • 1,040 mm of rain fell between 1 July and 14 August.
  • At about 6:50 a.m. the lower part of a valley-side slope below Sugar Loaf mountain, in Regent, began to slip; about ten minutes later a "more destructive stage" followed.
  • Clayey soil and boulders of up to 40 m³ became a saturated, highly mobile debris flow, advancing down the river channel like a "tidal wave" along a 7 km corridor.
  • Classification: fast and loose: a wet debris flow.
Mission 8

Freetown: impacts

  • In the rapid assessment, about 6,000 people were affected and about 1,141 were declared dead or missing; it says "substantiated numbers remain scarce".
  • In Regent, 349 buildings were destroyed.
  • Damage and losses: about US$31.65 million.
Mission 8

Freetown: why so vulnerable

  • "Nearly all the poor in the Western Area live in informal housing".
  • The city's slopes "are steep and subject to ongoing slope instability", and settlement is expanding "into the more elevated, steeper and forested central mountain belt".
  • Deforestation: the World Bank assessment says it "cannot be attributed directly as the landslide trigger".
Mission 8

Portuguese Bend, California: event profile

Portuguese Bend landslide: cross-section and timelinePortuguese Bend: a slow rock slidesea levelroad fill added, 1956deep-seatedslide massslip surface on abedding planedewateringwells atthe toeAltamira Shale: the slip surface follows a bedding plane1946studied since then1956reactivated after road fill was placed2022–24wet years: the slide speeds up2024about 4 feet (1.2 m) a month, June to AugustLaterdewatering, slowing; voluntary buy-out offeredSchematic cross-section, not to scale. Type and slipsurface: Bouali et al. (2019); dates and speeds: CaliforniaGeological Survey (2024) and City of Rancho PalosVerdes.
  • One of three active landslides inside an ancient landslide complex on the Palos Verdes Peninsula (Los Angeles County), studied since 1946.
  • CGS attributes its reactivation in 1956 to road fill placed for the extension of Crenshaw Boulevard: a human cause, loading the slope.
  • A peer-reviewed study, citing CGS, classifies the major landslides there as "rock slides", deep-seated and moving on bedding planes in the Altamira Shale.
  • After the wet years of 2022–24 it sped up: about 4 feet (1.2 m) a month from June to August 2024 (City of Rancho Palos Verdes, reported by CGS).
  • Classification: slow and solid: a coherent mass sliding on a slip surface, lasting decades.
Calculate
?In mid-2024 the Portuguese Bend landslide moved about 4 feet a month. Taking 1 foot = 30.48 cm and a month as 30 days, how fast was it moving in cm per day?
Mission 8

Portuguese Bend: impacts and responses

  • Damage to homes, roads and utilities, with indefinite gas and electricity shut-offs for hundreds of residents.
  • Dewatering wells at the toe removed over half a billion gallons of groundwater in two years. In late 2024 the City reported movement slowing, after dewatering and drier weather.
  • A voluntary buy-out offers the pre-disaster appraised value. FEMA covers 75% of eligible costs; the other 25% is deducted from the seller's proceeds. Homes are demolished and the land kept as open space.
  • The programme began at US$42 million in 2024; by October 2026 over US$54 million had been awarded for 27 homes. The City received 85 applications.
Mission 8

Perception and preparedness: the two landslides

  • Freetown: the Regent landslides happened in locations already marked on landslide hazard maps, but "flooding is a much more common hazard than large-scale landslides" there.
  • Freetown: "people were in the process of evacuating, some unsuccessfully, before the landslide". Two failures ten minutes apart left little time.
  • Portuguese Bend: movement is slow and monitored (studied since 1946), so residents and the City have time to act.
  • Exam move: speed of onset shapes perception and preparedness. A slow slide is seen and planned for; a fast flow gives almost no second chance.
Quick check
?Which response at Portuguese Bend tackles the cause of the movement, not its effects?
Mission 8

Comparing the two (AO3)

Freetown 2017Portuguese Bend
Speed and materialfast, loose debris flowslow, solid rock slide
Durationminutesdecades
Causeintense rainroad fill (1956); wet years
Main losseslives and homeshomes, roads, services
  • Speed decides the threat: a fast flow threatens lives; a slow slide mainly threatens property, services and roads.
  • Capacity: Rancho Palos Verdes draws on federal and state funds; Freetown's poorest lived in informal housing.
  • Synthesis: in both places, human actions (road fill; building on steep slopes) interacted with heavy rain.
Mission check

?Freetown's 2017 landslide and the Portuguese Bend landslide: are they the same hazard?
Mission 9

Mission 9: Large earthquakes are not becoming more common. So why do experts expect more people to be affected by geophysical disasters?

Make a guess: Large earthquakes are not becoming more common. So why do experts expect more people to be affected by geophysical disasters?

Mission 9

Event frequency: no upward trend

Earthquakes of M7 or more per year, 2000 to 2021Earthquakes of M7 or more, per yearWorld, 2000–2021 (USGS statistics table)102002010: 24200020212010long-term average, about 16 a year2010: USGS’s FAQ gives 23; its table counts 24 (23 ofM7–7.9 and one M8).Sources: USGS, Lists, maps, and statistics (yearly values:M7–7.9 plus M8 or more); USGS FAQ, Why are we havingso many earthquakes? (long-term average about 16).
  • USGS: catalogues list more earthquakes "not because there are more earthquakes, but because there are more seismic instruments".
  • Year-to-year swings are normal. USGS's FAQ gives 2010 as the year with most major earthquakes (23) and 1989 with 6. Its statistics table counts 24 of M7 or more in 2010 (23 of M7–7.9 and one M8).
Mission 9

Disaster trends

  • Recorded earthquake disasters rose from 445 (1980–1999) to 552 (2000–2019); volcanic disasters from 84 to 102.
  • In 2000–2019, earthquakes and tsunamis were the deadliest type of disaster: 58% of all disaster deaths.
  • Exam move: more recorded disasters does not mean more earthquakes. Better reporting and more exposed people and assets both raise the counts.
Mission 9

Exposure is rising

  • The EU's Joint Research Centre found that people living in seismic areas rose from about 1.41 billion in 1975 to 2.72 billion in 2015. It counts people where a 475-year earthquake would give at least moderate shaking.
  • People within 100 km of the 220 most dangerous volcanoes rose from about 227 million to 414 million, but their share of world population stayed about 5.5%: the rise follows population growth.
  • Brown and others put the number within 100 km of any active volcano at about 800 million. The two volcano figures use different lists of volcanoes.
Calculate
?The population living in seismic areas rose from 1.41 billion (1975) to 2.72 billion (2015). Calculate the percentage increase.
Mission 9

Future projections

  • World population is projected to grow from 8.2 billion (2024) to about 10.3 billion in the mid-2080s (UN projection).
  • The JRC: "With a growing population and urbanizing area, also exposure is expected to increase".
  • Landslides triggered by human activity may be increasing, though part of the rise in the 2004–2016 record reflects better reporting.
  • So, while event frequency is steady, rising exposure points to more people at risk, unless vulnerability falls.
Quick check
?A news story argues that because earthquake losses keep rising, earthquakes must be getting more frequent. Why is this not proof?
Mission 9

Government planning: land-use zoning

Fault-zone set-back: plan viewSet back from an active faultnot allowed:over the faultset back about 50 ft(about 15 m)active fault tracefault zone(regulated)NSchematic plan view, not to scale. Source: CaliforniaGeological Survey, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones(buildings for people may not be placed over an activefault and must generally be set back about 50 feet).
  • California's Alquist-Priolo Act, passed after the 1971 San Fernando earthquake: buildings for people cannot be placed over an active fault, and must generally be set back about 50 feet (about 15 m).
  • Limitation: it covers only surface fault rupture, not shaking, liquefaction or landslides, which a separate Act maps.
  • Managed retreat: the owners of almost 5,500 Christchurch properties accepted government offers. The 602-hectare red zone, land that once held more than 5,000 homes, is now a river-corridor regeneration area.
Mission 9

Personal resilience: preparedness

  • Preparedness: drills teach "Drop, Cover, and Hold On". In 2015, more than 40 million people in 60 countries registered for ShakeOut drills.
  • Knowing what to do saves time: the people most at risk are those who must work it out during the shaking.
Mission 9

Personal resilience: insurance

  • New Zealand: homeowners with private home insurance also get state natural-hazards cover, generally up to NZ$300,000 plus GST, through the Natural Hazards Commission (the Earthquake Commission at the time of Kaikōura).
  • Iceland: NTÍ covers volcanic, earthquake and landslide damage to buildings.
  • California: only 15.24% of homeowners' policies included earthquake cover in 2025.
Quick check
?Which statement best evaluates insurance as an adaptation?
Mission 9

New technology: early warning

Early-warning timeline as a distance–time graphHow early warning buys timedistance from the epicentretimeP waves detectedwarningtimeP wavesS and surface wavesalert sentlongerwarningThe alert travels almost instantly; the damaging wavesdo not. The farther the place, the more time it has.Schematic concept: no values. Source: Given et al. (2014),Technical implementation plan for the ShakeAlertproduction system, USGS Fact Sheet 2014-3083.
  • Earthquake early warning detects the fast, weaker P waves and sends alerts "seconds to minutes" before the stronger S and surface waves arrive.
  • Japan invested US$600 million after the 1995 Kobe earthquake. In 2011 no trains derailed, and 90% of citizens polled said it was worth it.
  • Android phones now act as a global network: alerts in 98 countries. In user feedback, 85% of people alerted said they felt shaking, and 36% received the alert before it began.
  • Limit: it gives warning, not prediction.
Mission 9

Perspectives on adaptation (AO3)

  • Governments: zoning and buy-outs protect many people, but uproot communities (Christchurch, Grindavík, Portuguese Bend).
  • Households: insurance, retrofitting and drills depend on income and knowledge. At Portuguese Bend, sellers themselves pay 25% of the buy-out cost.
  • Technology: phone alerts reach places without seismometer networks, but warning times can be short.
  • Exam move: weigh who pays, who benefits, and over what time scale.
Mission check

?Large earthquakes are not becoming more common. Why do experts expect more people to be affected?
Mission 10

Mission 10: By 2013, Hong Kong said it had cut the landslide risk from its man-made slopes by about 75%. Is preventing disasters worth more than responding to them?

Make a guess: By 2013, Hong Kong said it had cut the landslide risk from its man-made slopes by about 75%. Is preventing disasters worth more than responding to them?

Mission 10

The management cycle

The disaster management cycle and Park’s modelThe management cycleBefore the eventMitigationPreparednessResponserescueRecoveryrehabilitation,reconstructionhazard eventAfter the eventPark’s model (1991): quality of life over timetimequality of lifenormalimpactreliefrehabilitationreconstructionless preparedbetter preparedSchematic: the curves are generalised, not measurements.Park’s model: Park (1991).
  • Pre-event: mitigation (reduce the hazard's effects or the vulnerability) and preparedness (warning systems, plans, drills).
  • Post-event: rescue (hours to days), rehabilitation (weeks to months: shelter, water, services), reconstruction (years).
  • Each stage feeds the next: how a place is rebuilt sets its vulnerability for the next event.
Mission 10

Park's disaster-response model

The disaster management cycle and Park’s modelThe management cycleBefore the eventMitigationPreparednessResponserescueRecoveryrehabilitation,reconstructionhazard eventAfter the eventPark’s model (1991): quality of life over timetimequality of lifenormalimpactreliefrehabilitationreconstructionless preparedbetter preparedSchematic: the curves are generalised, not measurements.Park’s model: Park (1991).
  • Park's model (Park, 1991) plots quality of life against time: a sharp fall at impact, then relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction.
  • Better preparation makes the fall shallower and the recovery faster.
  • Limitation: it is a generalised curve, not a measurement, and recovery is uneven between groups.
Mission 10

Pre-event: slope stabilisation

Slope stabilisation measuresStabilising a slope123451Cover the slope with an impermeable membrane2Direct surface water away3Drain groundwater out4Retaining structure or rock-and-soil berm at thetoe5Remove weight from the top (dashed outline)Also: minimise surface irrigation.Schematic cross-section, not to scale. Measures as listedin Highland (2004), Landslide types and processes, USGSFact Sheet 2004-3072.
  • Keep groundwater down: cover the slope, drain surface water away, drain groundwater out, reduce irrigation.
  • Add support: a retaining structure or a rock and soil berm at the toe; or remove weight from the top.
  • Hong Kong set up a slope-safety office in 1977, after the Sau Mau Ping disaster of 1976. In 2013 it said the risk from man-made slopes had fallen by 75%; its engineering department now says "less than 20% of the 1977 level".
Quick check
?Which measure tackles the most common trigger of fatal landslides, rain?
Mission 10

Pre-event: building design for earthquakes

Earthquake-resistant building: braced frame, shear wall, base isolationDesigning a building to resist an earthquakeground shakingBracedframeShearwallBase-isolationbearingsBraced frames and shear walls give rigidity againstsideways forces. Rubber or sliding bearings betweenbuilding and foundation change how it responds andadd damping.Schematic cutaway, not to scale. Terms: FEMA (2022),Earthquake-resistant design concepts (FEMA P-749).
  • Braced frames and shear walls give buildings rigidity against sideways forces.
  • Base isolation: rubber or sliding bearings between a building and its foundations change how it responds and add damping.
  • Codes matter. In Mashiki (Kumamoto, Japan, 2016) wooden houses built before 1981 collapsed far more often than newer ones.
  • So retrofitting older buildings is a priority.
Mission 10

Pre-event: tsunami defences

Japan’s two levels of tsunami defenceTwo levels of tsunami: Japan’s approachlargest possible tsunami:overtops the wallfrequent tsunami:held by the wallseawall,about 12 mevacuate tohigh groundAbout 12 m walls are planned against tsunamisexpected every 200–300 years. For the largest possibletsunamis, defences plus evacuation planning.Schematic cross-section, not to scale. Levels: CentralDisaster Management Council, Japan (2011); wall heightand return period: Stein and Stein (2012), GSA Today.
  • Japan, 2011: the tsunami overtopped coastal defences, mainly 5–10 m seawalls. More than 15,000 people died. Inundation was much wider than hazard maps had predicted.
  • Japan now plans for two levels: coastal protection for frequent tsunamis; for the largest possible ones, structures plus measures centred on evacuation, such as hazard maps.
  • Walls of about 12 m are planned against tsunamis expected about every 200–300 years. Critics argue that moving shrinking communities may be more efficient.
Quick check
?Which evaluation of seawalls is best supported by the Japanese evidence?
Mission 10

Pre-event: GPS monitoring of volcanoes

GPS monitoring: uplift at Svartsengi reached 35 cm by mid-December 2023GPS monitoring at Svartsengimagma accumulatesGPS stationgroundrisesoriginal levelUplift at Svartsengi (cm)0203535 cmNov 2023mid-Dec 2023Only the two ends are reported; the dashed line doesnot show the path between.Sketch is schematic. Value: Smithsonian Global VolcanismProgram (35 cm of uplift recorded since the start of thedike intrusion in November).
  • GPS monitoring: Hawaii's permanent GPS stations find their positions daily, usually to better than a centimetre, revealing magma moving underground.
  • At Svartsengi, GPS showed 35 cm of uplift by mid-December 2023.
  • Estimates of the magma volume are compared with the volumes that came before earlier eruptions, to judge when the next is likely.
Mission 10

Pre-event: lava diversion

  • Earth barriers at Fagradalsfjall (2021) delayed lava by up to 16 days.
  • At Heimaey (1973), seawater was sprayed on the lava to cool and slow it, saving the harbour.
  • Limit: at Grindavík, on 14 January 2024, a fissure opened at the edge of town outside the barrier, and its lava burned three homes.
Mission 10

Post-event: rescue and rehabilitation

  • Nepal, 2015: the government asked for international help within hours. 134 international search-and-rescue teams from 34 countries came.
  • Helicopters made 4,236 flights; 7,558 people were rescued by air and 4,689 by land.
  • Rehabilitation: transit shelters were set up in Kathmandu, but there were not enough tarpaulins.
Mission 10

Post-event: communications technology

  • Mapping: after Nepal's earthquakes over 6,000 volunteers added data to OpenStreetMap, used by the Nepal army, the Red Cross and others. Satellite images mapped at least 25,000 landslides.
  • Tracking displaced survivors: anonymised data from 12 million mobile phones showed an estimated 390,000 more people than normal leaving the Kathmandu Valley.
  • Limit: "Phone ownership is skewed towards certain population groups", and some areas had little or no network coverage.
  • Development: Nepal's housing programme recorded agreements in a digital system, and engineers inspected homes with a tablet app.
Mission 10

Post-event: reconstruction and continuing development

  • Nepal's housing programme built over 700,000 earthquake-resilient houses. The World Bank-supported project funded over 300,000.
  • Grants of NPR 300,000 came in three parts: NPR 50,000 → 150,000 → 100,000. The second and third were paid only after engineers certified safe construction.
  • Masons and engineers were trained. More than 18,000 vulnerable people (such as single women, older and disabled people) who had not finished rebuilding were identified for extra help.
  • Kaikōura's road and rail recovery work was scheduled to finish on 15 December 2020.
Quick check
?Which feature of Nepal's reconstruction most directly promotes continuing human development?
Mission 10

Evaluating management (AO3)

  • Mitigation can pay: a US study found federal mitigation grants "save $6 per $1 spent", and adopting model building codes $11.
  • Hong Kong's 75% is the government measuring its own programme: name the source when you use it.
  • Pre-event measures can be exceeded by rarer events (Tōhoku's walls); post-event rescue saves lives within hours, and reconstruction decides how vulnerable people will be next time.
  • Scale: local (barriers, slope drains), national (building codes, insurance), global (phone alerts, volunteer mapping).
Mission check

?Is preventing disasters worth more than responding to them?
Exam technique

How Option D is examined (Paper 1)

  • Paper 1 is 35% of the grade at both levels. SL: two options, 1 hour 30 minutes, 40 marks. HL: three options, 2 hours 15 minutes, 60 marks.
  • For each option: a structured question (10 marks), then one extended answer from a choice of two (10 marks). About 45 minutes per option.
Exam technique

What the top band rewards (extended answer, 9–10 marks)

  • The answer is "in-depth and question-specific (topic and command term)".
  • Examples, statistics and details are "integrated", not listed: give each case study's place, date and figures.
  • Evaluation discusses other perspectives and the "strengths and weaknesses of evidence", such as disputed death tolls and differing magnitudes.
  • The conclusion is "balanced and aligned with the evidence", and diagrams are annotated and support the argument.
Recap

The big ideas

  • Internal heat drives convection; slab pull, ridge push and plumes move the plates, so hazards cluster at margins and hotspots.
  • Magma viscosity sets eruption style and volcano shape; secondary hazards such as lahars can kill far from the vent (Armero).
  • Earthquakes vary by depth, wave type and margin; people can trigger them (Koyna, Oklahoma).
  • Small events are frequent and large ones rare; a few high-impact events cause most deaths, so planners use return periods.
  • Risk = hazard × exposure × vulnerability ÷ capacity: economic, social, demographic, political and geographic factors (Aceh, Japan, Nepal).
  • Contrasting cases: Nepal and Kaikōura; Fuego and Grindavík; Freetown and Portuguese Bend.
  • Exposure is rising; adaptation, pre-event measures and post-event recovery decide the future toll.

Final screen. Score, the mission list ticked, and "Next: test yourself in the Verify stage" (links to the Verify quiz).

🏆

Mini-lesson complete!

⭐⭐⭐

You've worked through Geophysical hazards for IB Diploma Geography SL and HL. 🎉

  1. Mission 1The Atlantic is about 2.5 cm wider every year. What moves the plates?
  2. Mission 2In 1985 a volcano 45 km away killed about 23,000 people in Armero, two hours after it erupted. How?
  3. Mission 3The central and eastern USA used to have about 25 earthquakes of magnitude 3 or more a year. In 2015 it had 1,010. What changed?
  4. Mission 4About 1,600 magnitude-5 earthquakes strike each year, and about one magnitude-8. Which should planners prepare for?
  5. Mission 5In one Aceh village, the 2004 tsunami killed four females for every male. Why would a wave "choose"?
  6. Mission 6Nepal 2015 and Kaikōura 2016 were both magnitude 7.8. One killed more than 8,790 people; the other killed 2. Why?
  7. Mission 7On Fuego, in 2018, a golf resort evacuated safely. A village two kilometres further on was buried. Why?
  8. Mission 8In 2017 a hillside above Freetown collapsed; about 1,141 people were declared dead or missing. A Californian landslide has been moving since 1956 and is still destroying homes. Are they the same hazard?
  9. Mission 9Large earthquakes are not becoming more common. So why do experts expect more people to be affected by geophysical disasters?
  10. Mission 10By 2013, Hong Kong said it had cut the landslide risk from its man-made slopes by about 75%. Is preventing disasters worth more than responding to them?

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Verify stage.

📣 Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

→ Back to IB Geography · SL

Sources for this lesson are listed at the bottom of the page.

Sources (83)

The sources behind the facts and figures in this lesson.

  1. S1 IBO, Geography guide (first assessment 2019; updated 2022): Option D, assessment outline and markbands
  2. S2 USGS, This Dynamic Earth (1996 booklet, online edition): "Some unanswered questions"
  3. S3 USGS, This Dynamic Earth: "Understanding plate motions"
  4. S4 USGS, This Dynamic Earth: "Hotspots"
  5. S5 USGS FAQ, "Where do earthquakes occur?"
  6. S6 USGS FAQ, "How many active volcanoes are there on Earth?"
  7. S7 USGS, Volcanoes (general-interest publication): "Principal types of volcanoes"
  8. S8 US National Park Service, "Volcanic eruptions"
  9. S9 USGS Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, "The Volcanic Explosivity Index" (26 Dec 2022)
  10. S10 USGS Volcano Hazards Program, "Pyroclastic flows move fast and destroy everything in their path"
  11. S11 USGS Volcano Hazards Program, "Lahars move rapidly down valleys like rivers of concrete"
  12. S12 USGS Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, "Volcano Watch: Lessons learned from the Armero, Colombia tragedy" (29 Oct 2009)
  13. S13 Highland L. (2004), Landslide types and processes, USGS Fact Sheet 2004-3072
  14. S14 USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, "Determining the depth of an earthquake"
  15. S15 USGS, "Two kinds of waves are generated by earthquakes" (1906 earthquake pages)
  16. S16 British Geological Survey, "How are earthquakes detected?"
  17. S17 USGS, "Earthquake magnitude, energy release, and shaking intensity"
  18. S18 USGS FAQ, "What is a fault and what are the different types?"
  19. S19 USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, "Induced earthquakes overview" (updated 9 Mar 2022), with its publication list
  20. S20 USGS, "Lists, maps, and statistics" (worldwide counts and deaths 2000–2021; counts by state 2010–2015, as of March 2016)
  21. S21 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 87(6) (1997), abstract on Koyna–Warna reservoir seismicity
  22. S22 UNDRR/ISC, Hazard Information Profile GH0307, "Liquefaction" (PreventionWeb)
  23. S23 New Zealand Government (DPMC archive), "Land zone announcement", 23 Mar 2012
  24. S24 Christchurch City Council, "Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor: history and background"
  25. S25 USGS FAQ, "Why are we having so many earthquakes? Has naturally occurring earthquake activity been increasing?"
  26. S26 USGS (2015), Seismic-hazard maps for the conterminous United States, 2014, SIM 3325
  27. S27 UNDRR Terminology: "Disaster risk", "Vulnerability", "Capacity", "Resilience"
  28. S28 Oxfam (2005), The tsunami's impact on women, briefing note
  29. S29 Cabinet Office, Japan, White Paper on Disaster Management 2011 (summary)
  30. S30 UNDRR and CRED (2020), The human cost of disasters: an overview of the last 20 years (2000–2019)
  31. S31 Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission (2015), Nepal Earthquake 2015: Post Disaster Needs Assessment, Executive Summary
  32. S32 USGS event page, M7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, 25 Apr 2015 (us20002926): parameters, tectonic summary, impact summary
  33. S33 USGS event page, M7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand, 13 Nov 2016 UTC (us1000778i): parameters and tectonic summary
  34. S34 GeoNet (GNS Science / Earth Sciences New Zealand), "M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake" story
  35. S35 Ministry for Culture and Heritage, NZHistory, "Kaikōura earthquake"
  36. S36 NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi, "Work on the Kaikōura transport networks to be completed 2020" (media release, 2020) and project page
  37. S37 Earthquake Commission (NZ), Annual Report 2016–17
  38. S38 Roback K. et al. (2018), "The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal", Geomorphology (USGS publication page)
  39. S39 Fujita K. et al. (2017), "Anomalous winter-snow-amplified earthquake-induced disaster of the 2015 Langtang avalanche in Nepal", NHESS 17: 749
  40. S40 Charbonnier S.J. et al. (2023), "Unravelling the dynamics and hazards of the June 3rd, 2018, pyroclastic density currents at Fuego volcano (Guatemala)", JVGR 436: 107791
  41. S41 Naismith A. et al. (2020), "Fireside tales: understanding experiences of previous eruptions…", Volcanica 3(2): 206–226
  42. S42 Smithsonian Global Volcanism Program, Fuego (342090)
  43. S43 Oregon State University, Volcano World: Fuego (tectonic map caption)
  44. S44 Smithsonian Global Volcanism Program, Reykjanes (371020): geological summary and weekly reports 2023–2025
  45. S45 IFRC (2023), DREF Operation MDRIS001: Iceland, volcanic and seismic activity in Grindavík
  46. S46 NASA Earth Observatory (Jan 2024), image story on lava near Grindavík
  47. S47 Ísland.is (Digital Iceland): Þórkatla purchase of residential property in Grindavík; news, 27 Mar 2024 (Act 16/2024)
  48. S48 Natural Catastrophe Insurance of Iceland (NTÍ), "Insurance coverage" (Ísland.is)
  49. S49 Norwegian SciTech News (NTNU), "Protecting Iceland's towns from lava flows – with dirt" (8 May 2025)
  50. S50 Froude M.J. and Petley D.N. (2018), "Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016", NHESS 18: 2161–2181
  51. S51 Highland L.M. and Bobrowsky P. (2008), The landslide handbook, USGS Circular 1325
  52. S52 Government of Sierra Leone and World Bank/GFDRR (2017), Rapid damage and loss assessment of August 14th, 2017 landslides and floods in the Western Area
  53. S53 California Geological Survey, California Geology 2024 news: "Portuguese Bend landslide"
  54. S54 City of Rancho Palos Verdes: Land Movement page and Voluntary Property Buyout Program updates (14 Oct 2026); announcement of the $42 million programme (2024)
  55. S55 European Commission Joint Research Centre (2017), Atlas of the Human Planet 2017: Global exposure to natural hazards
  56. S56 UN DESA, press release on World Population Prospects 2024 (11 Jul 2024); values after 2024 are projections
  57. S57 Brown S.K. et al. (2015), "Global volcanic hazards and risk", in Global Volcanic Hazards and Risk (Cambridge), USGS publication page; University of Bristol news (Aug 2015)
  58. S58 California Geological Survey, "Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones"
  59. S59 Natural Hazards Commission Toka Tū Ake (NZ): "EQCover building cap begins doubling…" (30 Sep 2022) and "Your natural hazards cover" factsheet
  60. S60 California Department of Insurance, Earthquake premium and policy count data call: summary of 2025 residential totals
  61. S61 Given D.D. et al. (2014), Technical implementation plan for the ShakeAlert production system, USGS Fact Sheet 2014-3083
  62. S62 Allen R.M., Stogaitis M. et al. (2025), "Global earthquake detection and warning using Android phones", Science 389: 254–259 (Google Research page)
  63. S63 USGS (14 Oct 2015), "Get ready to ShakeOut October 15"
  64. S64 Hong Kong SAR Government press release (7 Jul 2013), "Government endeavours to prevent and mitigate landslips"; CEDD Hong Kong Slope Safety, "Slope safety system: overview"
  65. S65 FEMA (2022), Earthquake-resistant design concepts (FEMA P-749)
  66. S66 Sunohara H. (Building Research Institute, Japan), presentation on building damage in the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, citing NILIM/BRI (2016)
  67. S67 Central Disaster Management Council, Japan (2011), Report of the Committee for Technical Investigation on Countermeasures for Earthquakes and Tsunamis…, outline
  68. S68 Stein S. and Stein J. (2012), "Rebuilding Tohoku: a joint geophysical and economic framework for hazard mitigation", GSA Today 22(10): 42–44
  69. S69 USGS Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, "Volcano Watch: Scientific community lends a hand to measure Kīlauea's changing shape" (30 Aug 2018)
  70. S70 World Bank, "Post-earthquake reconstruction in Nepal: rebuilding lives, one home at a time" (results brief, 29 Sep 2020); "Lessons in earthquake reconstruction: five proven approaches from Nepal" (1 Dec 2021)
  71. S71 GFDRR, Mapping local communities to inform response and recovery in Nepal (Stories of Impact)
  72. S72 Wilson R. et al. (2016), "Rapid and near real-time assessments of population displacement using mobile phone data following disasters: the 2015 Nepal earthquake", PLOS Currents Disasters
  73. S73 US Energy Information Administration (22 Jun 2017), "Earthquake trends in Oklahoma and other states likely related to wastewater injection"
  74. S74 Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (NZ), Building Performance: "B1 Structure" (Building Code compliance)
  75. S75 Earle S., Physical Geology, 4.5 "Mechanisms for plate motion" (University of Saskatchewan Open Press, open textbook)
  76. S76 USGS FAQ, "Does fracking cause earthquakes?"
  77. S77 Muttarak R. and Lutz W. (2014), "Is education a key to reducing vulnerability to natural disasters and hence unavoidable climate change?", Ecology and Society 19(1): 42
  78. S78 Bouali E.H., Oommen T. and Escobar-Wolf R. (2019), "Evidence of instability in previously-mapped landslides… Portuguese Bend landslide complex, California", Remote Sensing 11(8): 937
  79. S79 Icelandic Met Office, "Fagradalsfjall eruption" (Reykjanes unrest overview)
  80. S80 Civil Engineering and Development Department, Hong Kong, Geotechnical Engineering FAQ
  81. S81 National Institute of Building Sciences (2019), Natural hazard mitigation saves: 2019 report (Porter, Dash, Huyck et al.), PreventionWeb summary
  82. S82 USGS event page, M7.0 Haiti, 12 Jan 2010 (usp000h60h): impact summary
  83. S83 USGS event page, M9.1 Sumatra–Andaman Islands, 26 Dec 2004 (official20041226005853450_30): impact summary