← IB Geography · SL · HL · IB Geography revision
⭐ 0
IB Diploma Geography SL and HL · Option A: Freshwater
Mini-LessonSL and HL

Freshwater (drainage basins)

12 missions. Guess, learn, then check. Your place is saved.

  1. Mission 1At any moment, rivers hold only about 0.006% of Earth's fresh water. So how does a river keep flowing through weeks without rain?
  2. Mission 2A silt grain is one-hundredth the width of a coarse sand grain, yet water must flow about three times as fast to pick it up. Why?
  3. Mission 3Niagara Falls has moved about 7 miles (11 km) upstream in about 12,000 years. How does a waterfall move backwards?
  4. Mission 4On 23 December 2013, 43–45 mm of rain fell on two river basins in southern England. Within a day, one river surged to one of its highest flows since records began; the other barely rose, and peaked only in mid-February after weeks more rain. Why did the same storm have such different effects?
  5. Mission 5A study found that urbanization made Hurricane Harvey-scale flooding in Houston's basins about 21 times as likely in 2017. How can a city make a flood worse?
  6. Mission 6In 1995, more than 250,000 people in the Netherlands had to leave their homes as the rivers rose. The Dutch response was not simply higher dikes. What did they do?
  7. Mission 7In January 2018 Cape Town, a city of just over 4 million people, warned that its taps could be turned off in April: "Day Zero". What pushed it to the edge, and how did it pull back?
  8. Mission 8Every summer, parts of Chesapeake Bay, USA, become "dead zones" with too little oxygen for fish and shellfish. Much of the cause starts on land, in a watershed spanning six states. How can a farm field suffocate a bay?
  9. Mission 9The Aral Sea was once the fourth-largest lake in the world. In 2014 the eastern part of its southern basin disappeared completely. What drained it?
  10. Mission 10About 85% of the Nile's water starts in Ethiopia, yet a 1959 agreement shared it between Egypt and Sudan. Who decides how it is used now, and what would make a deal work?
  11. Mission 11The Lower Mekong's fisheries land an estimated 2.3 million tonnes of fish a year, worth about US$11 billion. Its hydropower capacity could more than double. Can one river be both a great fishery and a giant power station?
  12. Mission 12Since 1970 the world has lost about 22% of its wetlands. Can a plan for a whole river basin bring a wetland back?
Mission 1

Mission 1: At any moment, rivers hold only about 0.006% of Earth's fresh water. So how does a river keep flowing through weeks without rain?

Make a guess: At any moment, rivers hold only about 0.006% of Earth's fresh water. So how does a river keep flowing through weeks without rain?

Mission 1

The drainage basin

  • A drainage basin is the area of land drained by a river and its tributaries.
  • Its boundary is the watershed: high ground separating one basin from the next.
  • Tributaries join at a confluence; the river ends at its mouth, in a sea or lake.
  • The basin is an open system: water and sediment enter and leave it.
Mission 1

Inputs and outputs

The drainage basin as an open systemInput: precipitation(rain, snow)Output: evapotranspiration(evaporation andtranspiration)Vegetationinterception onleavesCryospheresnow, glaciers,frozen groundSurface storespuddles, lakesSoil moistureGroundwaterheld in aquifersChannelthe riverinfiltrationpercolationoverland flowthroughflowbase flowmeltOutput: leavesunderground, or ispumped outOutput: river flowat the mouthSystems diagram: boxes are stores, arrows are flows.
  • Input: precipitation. Its type (rain or snow) and intensity (mm per hour) decide what happens next.
  • Snow is stored until it melts. Intense rain can fall faster than the ground can absorb it.
  • Outputs: evaporation from surfaces and transpiration from plants (together, evapotranspiration), and river flow at the mouth.
  • Some water can also leave the basin underground, or be pumped out.
Mission 1

Stores

  • Vegetation (interception on leaves), surface stores (puddles, lakes), soil moisture and the channel.
  • Groundwater, held in aquifers: permeable rock that stores water and lets it move.
  • The cryosphere: snow, glaciers and frozen ground, which can hold water for months to centuries.
  • Stores delay water on its way to the river.
Mission 1

Flows

  • Infiltration: water soaks into the soil. Percolation: it moves down into the rock below.
  • Overland flow: infiltration-excess (Hortonian) flow when rain exceeds the soil's infiltration capacity; saturation-excess flow when the soil is already full.
  • Throughflow: water moves downslope through the soil.
  • Base flow: groundwater seeps slowly into the channel, keeping rivers flowing between storms.
Quick check
?Which flow usually takes longest to carry rainwater to the river?
Mission 1

Where the fresh water is

Where the fresh water isFresh water on Earth, by store (% of freshwater)Ice caps, glaciers and permanentsnow68.7%Freshgroundwater30.1%Magnified: two of the smallest storesFresh lakes0.26%Rivers0.006%00.3%Source: USGS Water Science School, "Where is Earth'swater?" (table from Shiklomanov, 1993). One estimate ata single point in time; percentages are rounded. Inset ismagnified, so its scale differs from the main bar.
  • Only about 2.5% of Earth's water is fresh.
  • Of that fresh water, 68.7% is in ice caps, glaciers and permanent snow, and 30.1% is groundwater.
  • Rivers hold about 0.006%: a tiny, fast-moving store, refilled from much larger, slower ones.
Mission 1

Groundwater feeds rivers

  • A USGS study of 54 US streams found groundwater contributed on average 52% of streamflow, ranging from 14% to 90%.
  • The USGS calls its base-flow method a "conservative estimate", so the true share may be higher.
  • So how a basin stores water decides how its river behaves in dry spells.
Mission 1

Ice feeds rivers

  • In the upper Indus basin, glacier melt contributed 40.6% of total runoff (1998–2007); in the upper Ganges, 11.5%. Snowmelt is counted separately.
  • The Indus is the world's most relied-upon mountain "water tower", and one of the most vulnerable.
  • Meltwater arrives in the warm season, often when rain is scarce.
Mission 1

The water balance

Lambourn water balanceRiver Lambourn: mean annual rainfall andrunoff, 1962–20190200400600800mm a yearE = ?768 mm235 mmRainfall (P)River runoff (Q)E is evapotranspiration: P = Q + E, with no long-termchange in storage.Source: UKCEH National River Flow Archive, station39019 (Lambourn at Shaw): catchment rainfall1962–2019; mean flow 1.743 m³/s over 234.1 km² = 235mm a year.
  • P = Q + E ± ΔS: precipitation = runoff + evapotranspiration ± change in storage.
  • Over many years, storage rises and falls but changes little overall, so E ≈ P − Q.
  • River Lambourn, southern England (234.1 km², on chalk): mean catchment rainfall 768 mm a year, 1962–2019.
  • Its mean flow, 1.743 m³/s, equals a runoff depth of 235 mm a year spread over the catchment.
Calculate

Use the Lambourn figures on screen 1.9, and assume storage does not change over the long term.

aCalculate the water lost to evapotranspiration each year, in mm.
bExpress it as a percentage of rainfall, to the nearest whole number.
Quick check
?Which conditions would produce the most overland flow?
Mission check

?How does a river keep flowing through weeks without rain?
Mission 2

Mission 2: A silt grain is one-hundredth the width of a coarse sand grain, yet water must flow about three times as fast to pick it up. Why?

Make a guess: A silt grain is one-hundredth the width of a coarse sand grain, yet water must flow about three times as fast to pick it up. Why?

Mission 2

River discharge

  • Discharge (Q): the volume of water passing a point each second, in m³/s ("cumecs").
  • Q = A × v: cross-sectional area (m²) × mean velocity (m/s).
  • To measure it, hydrologists divide the channel into vertical slices, usually 25–30, measure width, depth and velocity in each, and add up the slices.
Mission 2

Channel shape and efficiency

Two channels, same cross-sectional areaTwo rectangular channels with the samecross-sectional area, drawn to the same scaleChannel Xwidth 12 mdepth 1 mChannel Ywidth 4 mdepth 3 mBed and banks in contact with the water (thewetted perimeter)Model channels, drawn to the same scale. Width anddepth only.
  • Wetted perimeter (P): the length of bed and banks in contact with the water.
  • Hydraulic radius (R) = cross-sectional area ÷ wetted perimeter: R = A/P.
  • A larger R means a smaller share of the water touches the bed and banks, so less energy is lost to friction: the channel is more efficient.
  • Velocity also rises with gradient and falls with roughness (boulders, vegetation).
Calculate

Two model channels, both rectangular, carry water with the same cross-sectional area. Channel X is 12 m wide and 1 m deep. Channel Y is 4 m wide and 3 m deep.

aCalculate the hydraulic radius of channel X, in metres, to 2 decimal places.
bCalculate the hydraulic radius of channel Y, in metres.
Mission 2

Stream flow

  • Velocity is lowest against the bed and banks, where friction acts, and highest near the surface in mid-channel.
  • On a bend, the fastest flow swings towards the outer bank.
  • Most river flow is turbulent: eddies lift and carry sediment.
  • Stream flow changes with every storm and season, so discharge, velocity and the work a river can do change too.
Mission 2

Downstream changes: the Bradshaw model

The Bradshaw modelBradshaw model: changes from upstream todownstreamUpstreamDownstreamIncrease downstreamDischargeChannel widthChannel depthCross-sectional areaMean velocity (tends toincrease; manyexceptions)Load quantityDecrease downstreamGradientChannel bed roughnessLoad particle sizeSchematic of a generalised model, not measured data.Velocity: Leopold (1953), "generally tends to increasedownstream", with many reaches where it decreases.
  • Downstream, discharge, width, depth, cross-sectional area, mean velocity and load quantity increase.
  • Gradient, channel bed roughness and load particle size decrease.
  • Evidence on velocity: it "generally tends to increase downstream", but "there are many reaches in nearly all rivers where mean velocity decreases downstream" (Leopold, 1953).
  • Limitation: it is a generalised model. Tributaries, rock type, lakes and dams break the pattern.
Quick check
?Why does mean velocity often increase downstream, even though the gradient becomes gentler?
Mission 2

Erosion

  • Hydraulic action: the force of moving water, including air forced into cracks.
  • Abrasion: the load scrapes and grinds the bed and banks.
  • Attrition: particles collide, becoming smaller and rounder.
  • Solution: soluble rock such as limestone dissolves.
  • Vertical erosion deepens the channel; lateral erosion widens it.
Mission 2

Transport

  • Traction: the largest particles roll or slide along the bed.
  • Saltation: smaller bed-load particles, such as sand, bounce along the bed.
  • The bed load "may only be moved during rapid flows under flood conditions".
  • Suspension: fine particles carried within the flow. Solution: the dissolved load, on average about 15% of the mass a stream transports.
Mission 2

Competence, capacity and deposition

  • Competence: the largest particle a river can move. Capacity: the total load it can carry.
  • Both rise as velocity rises, so most transport happens in high flows.
  • Deposition happens when velocity or discharge falls, or when the load exceeds capacity.
Mission 2

The Hjulström–Sundborg curve

Hjulstrom-Sundborg curveHjulström–Sundborg curve (schematic)0.0010.010.11101000.11101001000ClaySiltSandGravelParticle size (mm, log scale)Velocity (cm/s, log scale)ErosionDepositionTransport12311 mm sand: eroded at around 20 cm/s21 mm sand: stays in suspension until velocity dropsbelow about 10 cm/s30.01 mm silt: needs about 60 cm/s to be erodedSchematic of the curve shape, drawn through the threevalues quoted by Earle (2019); other positions areapproximate and versions of the curve differ. Size classes:Wentworth scale (IODP Proc. 331, Table T1).
  • The graph links particle size to the velocity needed to erode, transport or deposit it. Read values from it as approximate.
  • One textbook reading: a 1 mm sand grain is eroded at around 20 cm/s, and stays in suspension until velocity drops below about 10 cm/s.
  • A 0.01 mm silt grain needs about 60 cm/s to be eroded.
  • Fine grains, especially clay, are cohesive: they "stick together". They also lie within a thin layer of slow water on the bed, so turbulence barely reaches them.
Quick check
?A river slows from 30 cm/s to 5 cm/s as it enters a lake. What is most likely?
Mission 2

Spatial factors

  • Upper course: steep gradient and large, angular load; vertical erosion dominates.
  • Lower course: more discharge and finer load; lateral erosion and deposition dominate.
  • Channel characteristics: on a bend the outer bank is eroded and the inner bank receives deposits. Resistant rock and bank vegetation slow erosion.
Mission 2

Temporal factors: seasonality

Monsoon share of water and sediment, Ganges at Patna, 1980Ganges at Patna, 1980: share of the year in themonsoonAnnual waterdischarge76%Annual sedimentload88%0255075100% of the year's total moved in the monsoonSource: Subramanian (1996), IAHS Publication 236. Oneyear (1980) at one station (Patna), not a long-termaverage.
  • Much of a river's erosion and transport happens during high flows, when velocity, competence and capacity peak.
  • Ganges at Patna, 1980: about 88% of the year's sediment load moved during the monsoon, which carried 76% of the year's water.
  • In dry seasons, low velocity means deposition dominates.
  • Exam move: name the process, the place in the channel and the time of year.
Mission check

?Why must water flow about three times as fast to pick up a 0.01 mm silt grain as a 1 mm sand grain?
Mission 3

Mission 3: Niagara Falls has moved about 7 miles (11 km) upstream in about 12,000 years. How does a waterfall move backwards?

Make a guess: Niagara Falls has moved about 7 miles (11 km) upstream in about 12,000 years. How does a waterfall move backwards?

Mission 3

How a waterfall forms

How a waterfall retreatsResistant caprockWeaker rockWaterplunge poololdpositiongorgeretreat1Resistant rock liesover weaker rock.Water drops overthe edge.2Hydraulic actionand abrasion in theplunge poolundercut the face.3The unsupportedcaprock collapses.4Repeated collapsemakes thewaterfall retreatupstream, leaving asteep-sided gorge.Schematic cross-sections, not to scale.
  • Waterfalls form where a band of resistant rock lies over weaker rock.
  • The weaker rock erodes faster, leaving the resistant rock as an overhanging caprock.
  • Hydraulic action and abrasion in the plunge pool undercut the face, and the unsupported caprock collapses.
  • Repeated collapse makes the waterfall retreat upstream, leaving a steep-sided gorge.
Mission 3

Niagara Falls

Niagara Falls and the gorgeNiagara FallstodayStarting point,about 7 miles (11km) downstreamLake ErieLake Ontario10 kmNorth is up. Orange: the gorge cut as the falls retreated.Rock layers at NiagaraLockport Group: dolostones and limestones(resistant)Rochester Shale and other shales and limestones(less resistant)Map: Natural Earth; river line from the USGS NationalHydrography Dataset; Horseshoe Falls position from theCanadian Geographical Names Database. Rock names andthe 7 miles in about 12,000 years: New York StateMuseum, "Niagara Falls". The section is schematic.
  • Resistant dolostones and limestones of the Lockport Group overlie weaker shales and limestones, such as the Rochester Shale.
  • About 12,000 years ago water found a single low path; the falls have since migrated about 7 miles (about 11 km) upstream.
  • Over the last 500+ years, retreat was 3–5 feet (about 0.9–1.5 m) a year. It is now estimated at about 1 foot (0.3 m), largely because water is withdrawn for hydroelectric power.
Calculate
?Using screen 3.2 (1 mile = 1.609 km), calculate the average rate of retreat of Niagara Falls over the last 12,000 years, in metres per year, to 2 decimal places.
Mission 3

Meanders

Meander: plan and cross-sectionA. Plan view of a meanderflowABRiver cliff: outerbank, erosionPoint bar: innerbank, depositionThalweg: line of fastestflowB. Cross-section along A–BOuter bankInner bankRiver cliff:steep, erodedPoint bar:depositeddeephelicoidal flowC. How an oxbow lake forms1 The necknarrows2 The rivercuts throughin a flood3 Depositionseals theends4 An oxbowlake is leftSchematic, not to scale. Erosion on the outside of thebend, deposition on the inside (Earle, 2019).
  • On a bend, the line of fastest flow (the thalweg) swings to the outer bank. A corkscrew current (helicoidal flow) carries sediment across the bed towards the inner bank.
  • Outer bank: erosion forms a steep river cliff. Inner bank: deposition forms a point bar.
  • In cross-section the channel is deep on the outside of the bend and shallow on the inside.
  • Over time the channel "migrates around within its flood plain".
Mission 3

Oxbow lakes

  • Erosion on the outside of two neighbouring bends narrows the neck of land between them.
  • In a flood the river cuts through the neck and takes the shorter, steeper route.
  • Deposition seals off the old bend, leaving an oxbow lake.
Mission 3

Floodplains and levees

Floodplain and leveesCross-section across a floodplain123451finer sedimentchannel1Levees: the coarsest sediment is dropped first, closeto the channel.2Finer silt and clay settle further out on thefloodplain.3Vertical accretion: layers of alluvium left by floodsbuild the floodplain upwards.4Lateral accretion: point-bar deposits build itsideways as meanders migrate.5Valley side.Schematic cross-section; vertical scale exaggerated. AfterEarle (2019), Physical Geology, and the guide termsvertical and lateral accretion.
  • A floodplain is the wide, flat valley floor that floods. It is built sideways as meanders migrate and point bars grow (lateral accretion), and upwards by layers of alluvium left by floods (vertical accretion).
  • When a river overflows, velocity falls sharply at the bank edge, so the coarsest sediment is dropped first, close to the channel.
  • Flood after flood, this builds raised banks: natural levees. Finer silt and clay settle further out on the floodplain.
Quick check
?A river floods and spreads across its floodplain. Where is the coarsest sediment deposited?
Mission 3

How a delta forms

  • A delta forms where a river enters a sea or lake, slows, and deposits sediment faster than waves and tides remove it.
  • It needs a large sediment supply. "The formation of a delta depends on the interaction between the river flow and sediment supply" and the waves and tides that redistribute it.
  • The balance of river, wave and tide energy then sets the delta's shape, so deltas also form on stormy or strongly tidal coasts (screen 3.9).
  • In salt water, fine clay particles clump together (flocculation) and settle faster.
  • The river splits into distributaries; sediment builds outwards in bottomset, foreset and topset beds.
Mission 3

Delta types (Galloway, 1975)

Delta types and delta structureGalloway (1975) delta classificationRiver-dominatedWave-dominatedTide-dominatedMississippibird’s-footSão Francisco(Brazil): cuspateFly River(Papua NewGuinea):estuary-likeInside a delta: the beds1234riversea1Topset beds: flat-lying layers laid down on thedelta plain.2Foreset beds: inclined layers built outwards on thedelta front.3Bottomset beds: thin layers of the finest sedimentbeyond the foreset.4Distributaries: channels that carry water andsediment across the topset.Panel 1: Galloway (1975) classification, after Bosboomand Stive, Coastal Dynamics (TU Delft). Outlines areschematic. Panel 2: textbook structure, schematic.
  • Galloway's classification uses the balance of river, wave and tide energy:
    • river-dominated, a bird's-foot shape (the Mississippi);
    • wave-dominated, a smooth, cuspate shoreline (the São Francisco, Brazil);
    • tide-dominated, estuary-like (the Fly River, Papua New Guinea).
Mission 3

Deltas need a supply of sediment (synthesis)

  • Coastal Louisiana, on the Mississippi delta, lost about 4,833 km² of land between 1932 and 2016: about 25% of its 1932 land area. The USGS maps the change without assigning one cause; this screen follows one of them.
  • Dam construction in the Mississippi basin has cut the river's sediment load by about 50% (Blum and Roberts, 2009).
  • Elsewhere too, dams trap sediment: about 7 billion m³ of the High Aswan Dam's reservoir has filled with it, and on the Mekong "dams trap sediment" that maintains the delta's fertility.
  • So human interference in one part of a basin changes landforms in another: a spatial interaction.
Mission 3

Reading landforms on a topographic map

Practice topographic map13401441154216431744184519461 km (one grid square)Contours every 10 mRiver and lakePractice map, not a real place. Scale 1:50,000; gridsquares are 1 km; heavier contours every 50 m; north isup.
  • Contours close together mean a steep slope; far apart, gentle.
  • A V-shaped valley: contours make Vs pointing upstream, towards higher ground.
  • A waterfall: contours bunch together where they cross the river.
  • A floodplain: a wide, flat strip with few contours either side of a meandering river, often with oxbow lakes.
  • Locate features with grid references and measure them with the scale.
Quick check
?On a topographic map, contours cross a river in tight Vs that point the same way. What does this show?
Mission check

?How has Niagara Falls moved about 7 miles upstream?
Mission 4

Mission 4: On 23 December 2013, 43–45 mm of rain fell on two river basins in southern England. Within a day, one river surged to one of its highest flows since records began; the other barely rose, and peaked only in mid-February after weeks more rain. Why did the same storm have such different effects?

Make a guess: On 23 December 2013, 43–45 mm of rain fell on two river basins in southern England. Within a day, one river surged to one of its highest flows since records began; the other barely rose, and peaked only in mid-February after weeks more rain. Why did the same storm have such different effects?

Mission 4

The storm hydrograph

The storm hydrographThe storm hydrographTimeDischargeRainfalllag timePeak dischargeRising limbFalling(recession)limbBase flowStorm flow(quickflow)Schematic, not measured data. Lag time is measured frompeak rainfall, not from the start of the rain.
  • A storm hydrograph plots a river's discharge against time after a rainfall event; rainfall is shown as bars.
  • Rising limb: discharge increases. Peak discharge: the highest flow. Falling (recession) limb: flow declines.
  • Lag time: the time from peak rainfall to peak discharge.
  • Base flow: the slow groundwater contribution beneath the storm; storm flow (quickflow) sits on top.
Quick check
?What is lag time?
Mission 4

Two rivers, one storm

One storm, two riversOne storm, two rivers: daily mean flow andcatchment rainfallRiver Beult (Kent, clay)04080Rain 23 Dec: 42.6 mmPeak 24 Dec: 79.4River Lambourn (Berkshire, chalk)0510Rain 23 Dec: 44.9 mmPeak 15 Feb: 9.531 Dec1 Jan1 Feb1 MarFlow in m³/s (daily mean). Rainfall bars in mm, 0 to 50mm on both panels. The dashed line is 23 December.Source: UKCEH National River Flow Archive, gauged dailyflow and catchment daily rainfall, stations 40005 (Beult atStilebridge) and 39019 (Lambourn at Shaw). Daily means,not instantaneous peaks. Different flow scales.
  • Beult, Kent: 277.1 km², mean annual rainfall 691 mm (1961–90). Lambourn, Berkshire: 234.1 km², 736 mm (1961–90 standard average; screen 1.9 used the 1962–2019 mean, 768 mm).
  • 23 December 2013 catchment rainfall: Beult 42.6 mm; Lambourn 44.9 mm.
  • Beult: daily mean flow rose from 32.0 to 79.4 m³/s on 24 December, the highest daily mean in its daily series from 1958. The series has gaps.
  • Lambourn: from 1.42 to 2.39 m³/s. After about 317 mm more rain between 24 December and 15 February, it reached 9.53 m³/s on 15 February 2014, its highest daily mean.
Calculate

Mean flows over the records: Beult 2.126 m³/s; Lambourn 1.743 m³/s.

aHow many times its mean flow was the Beult's peak of 79.4 m³/s? Give 1 decimal place.
bHow many times its mean flow was the Lambourn's peak of 9.529 m³/s? Give 1 decimal place.
Mission 4

Chalk: the Lambourn

Chalk and clay catchmentsChalk: the LambournAbout 97% of its bedrock is highly permeableRain soaks inDeep water tableSaturated chalkFew surfacestreamsSprings feed theriverClay: the BeultAbout 74% of its bedrock has low permeabilityThroughflowWater cannot soak infarDense streamnetworkOverland flowSchematic block diagrams, not to scale. Percentages ofbedrock permeability from the NRFA catchmentdescriptors for the Lambourn and the Beult.
  • The Lambourn drains the Chalk of the Berkshire Downs: about 97% of its bedrock is highly permeable.
  • Rain infiltrates and percolates into the chalk aquifer, then reaches the river slowly as base flow.
  • Its NRFA drainage-density index is low (0.17): few surface channels.
Mission 4

Clay: the Beult

  • The Beult drains a "predominantly clay catchment": about 74% of its bedrock has low permeability.
  • Water cannot soak in far, so it reaches the river quickly as overland flow and throughflow.
  • Its NRFA drainage-density index is 1.11, about six times the Lambourn's: more channels carry water away faster.
Mission 4

The base flow index

  • Base flow index (BFI): the share of a river's long-term flow that comes from stored sources.
  • Lambourn 0.97; Beult 0.23.
  • The same geology sustains low flows: the flow exceeded 95% of the time is 0.77 m³/s on the Lambourn, but 0.057 m³/s on the Beult.
  • Permeable rock both slows floods and protects against drought.
Mission 4

Flow regimes

Flow regimesMonthly mean flow and rainfallRiver Beult (clay)0246Highest: Jan 5.53Lowest: Jul 0.22JFMAMJJASONDRiver Lambourn (chalk)0246Highest: Mar 2.59Lowest: Sep 1.11,Oct 1.10JFMAMJJASONDLine: monthly mean flow (m³/s), same 0 to 6 scale onboth panels. Bars hanging from the top: monthly meancatchment rainfall, 0 to 100 mm. Rainfall ranges: Beult47 to 84 mm, Lambourn 53 to 79 mm.Calculated from NRFA daily flow and rainfall data: Beultat Stilebridge, October 1958 to September 2025;Lambourn at Shaw, October 1962 to October 2019.Monthly means.
  • Monthly mean flows (calculated from NRFA daily data): the Beult is highest in January (5.53 m³/s) and lowest in July (0.22). The Lambourn is highest in March (2.59) and lowest in autumn (1.11 in September, 1.10 in October).
  • Monthly rainfall varies far less: 47–84 mm on the Beult and 53–79 mm on the Lambourn.
Mission 4

Why the regimes differ

  • Summer flows fall because evapotranspiration is higher.
  • The chalk aquifer fills in winter and drains slowly, so the Lambourn peaks late, in spring.
  • In cold climates, snowmelt gives a spring or summer peak, and frozen ground behaves like an impermeable surface.
Mission 4

Other natural influences

  • Basin shape: in a round basin, water from all parts arrives together, giving a higher, earlier peak than in an elongated one.
  • Slope speeds runoff. Soils: clay soils have a low infiltration capacity.
  • Antecedent conditions: rain on wet ground runs off faster. Before 23 December the Beult was already high after rain on 16–22 December.
  • Vegetation: interception and transpiration reduce and delay runoff.
Quick check
?Which basin would have the shortest lag time and highest peak after the same storm?
Mission 4

Exam move: describe, then explain (skills)

  • Describe with values from the graph: peak discharge, lag time, the steepness of the rising limb, base flow.
  • Explain with named factors, then weigh them. Here rainfall and basin size were similar, so geology was decisive.
  • The guide asks how water flows "can be represented graphically": draw and annotate the hydrograph.
Mission check

?Why did the Beult surge the day after the storm, while the Lambourn barely rose and peaked only in mid-February?
Mission 5

Mission 5: A study found that urbanization made Hurricane Harvey-scale flooding in Houston's basins about 21 times as likely in 2017. How can a city make a flood worse?

Make a guess: A study found that urbanization made Hurricane Harvey-scale flooding in Houston's basins about 21 times as likely in 2017. How can a city make a flood worse?

Mission 5

Flood risk: magnitude, frequency, distribution

  • A flood happens when discharge exceeds bankfull capacity and water covers land that is normally dry.
  • Magnitude: how big (peak discharge, depth). Frequency: how often a flood of that size occurs. Distribution: where in the basin floods happen.
  • Flood risk combines the hazard with who and what is exposed, and how vulnerable they are.
Mission 5

Urbanization

Urban and rural hydrographsSame rainfall, two catchmentsRainfallDischargeUrban lag timeRural lag timeUrban: higher peakRural: lower peakSteeperrising limbTimeSchematic: not to scale and no values. Both curves followthe same rainfall.
  • Impermeable surfaces (roofs, roads, car parks) reduce infiltration and increase overland flow.
  • Drains and sewers carry water to rivers quickly.
  • Result: shorter lag time, steeper rising limb, higher peak discharge.
  • Building on floodplains also raises exposure.
Mission 5

Hurricane Harvey, Houston, 2017

  • Harvey stalled over or near the Texas coast "for four days"; the highest storm total was 60.58 inches (about 1,540 mm), near Nederland, Texas (National Hurricane Center).
  • A study in Nature found that urbanization "exacerbated not only the flood response but also the storm total rainfall".
  • It estimated that the probability of such extreme floods in the basins studied rose by about 21 times on average because of urbanization (25–30 August 2017).
  • One modelling study of one event: strong evidence, but test it against others.
Quick check
?A new housing estate is planned upstream of a town. Which design would best stop it raising flood peaks downstream?
Mission 5

Deforestation: the mechanism

  • Trees intercept rain, roots open up the soil, and transpiration dries it, so more water infiltrates and is stored.
  • Removing them, especially on steep slopes, increases overland flow and soil erosion; eroded sediment can fill channels downstream.
  • FAO and CIFOR (2005): forests can reduce flooding from "frequent, low-intensity, short-duration storms".
  • But they "cannot stop catastrophic large-scale floods": in prolonged rain, forest soils saturate and water runs off the surface.
Mission 5

Deforestation and floods: a research debate (AO3)

  • The ecologists C.J.A. Bradshaw et al. (2007), using data from 56 developing countries, 1990–2000: flood frequency "is negatively correlated with the amount of remaining natural forest".
  • van Dijk et al. (2009): "population density alone already explains up to 83% of the variation in reported flood occurrences", and they judged the conclusion "unsupported".
  • Lesson: a correlation in reported floods may reflect how many people are there to report them.
Quick check
?Which is the strongest evaluation of the claim that deforestation causes large floods?
Mission 5

Channel modification: the Kissimmee River, Florida

The Kissimmee River, FloridaCentral FloridaLake KissimmeeLakeOkeechobeeKissimmee RiverEnlarged: the restored reach (boxed area above)River channel in 1952–54, before channelization: it"once meandered for 103 miles"Straightened channel (C-38 canal), 30 feet deep,cut in the 1960s; course from the NationalHydrography DatasetRestored floodplain mapped in 2020 (Phases I toIII)The river flows south from Lake Kissimmee to LakeOkeechobee. Restoration construction was completedin July 2021.Sources: SFWMD vegetation maps (1952–54, 2020) andKissimmee River page (S21); USGS National HydrographyDataset (red line: NHD flowline); Natural Earth.
  • Straightening, deepening and lining a channel speeds water away from one place, but can pass the flood peak downstream faster.
  • After "prolonged flooding in 1947", the Kissimmee River, which "once meandered for 103 miles", was cut into a 30-feet-deep straight channel in the 1960s.
  • It "destroyed much of a floodplain-dependent ecosystem". Restoration construction was completed in July 2021.
Mission 5

Frequency: recurrence intervals

Beult annual floodsRiver Beult: annual maximum daily mean flowm³/s, by water year (October to September)0204060801970/711990/912010/111979/802000/012013/14Orange dots mark water years with missing days in therecord, including 2000/01 (306 days of data) and2001/02 (239 days). Red bars: 2013/14, 2000/01 and1979/80.Calculated from NRFA gauged daily flow, Beult atStilebridge (station 40005). Daily means, notinstantaneous peaks; some days are missing.
  • Recurrence interval (RI) = (n + 1) ÷ m: n = years of record; m = the flood's rank (1 = largest).
  • A "100-year flood" has a 1% chance of being equalled or exceeded in any year, so two can happen in successive years.
  • Over a 30-year mortgage, a home on that floodplain has a 26% chance of flooding at least once.
  • Estimates depend on the length of the record and change with land use and climate.
Calculate
aIn the 67 water years (October to September) of the Beult's daily record, 1958/59 to 2024/25, the third-highest annual maximum daily mean flow was 65.3 m³/s on 28 December 1979. Higher were 79.4 m³/s (24 December 2013) and 75.8 m³/s (12 October 2000). Calculate its recurrence interval in years, to 1 decimal place.
bA flood has a 1% chance each year. Calculate the probability, as a percentage to 1 decimal place, of at least one such flood in 50 years.
Mission check

?How can a city make a flood worse?
Mission 6

Mission 6: In 1995, more than 250,000 people in the Netherlands had to leave their homes as the rivers rose. The Dutch response was not simply higher dikes. What did they do?

Make a guess: In 1995, more than 250,000 people in the Netherlands had to leave their homes as the rivers rose. The Dutch response was not simply higher dikes. What did they do?

Mission 6

Flood prediction: weather forecasting

  • Forecast skill 3–10 days ahead has increased by "about one day per decade": "today's 6-day forecast is as accurate as the 5-day forecast ten years ago".
  • Ensemble forecasts run a model many times from slightly different starting conditions, giving a probability rather than one answer.
  • Flood forecasts feed rainfall forecasts into river models, so better weather forecasts give earlier flood warnings.
Mission 6

Flood warning technology

  • Where rivers have few gauges, warnings are hardest to give.
  • An AI model forecast extreme river floods in ungauged basins up to five days ahead as reliably as, or better than, an existing global system's same-day estimates.
  • By 2024 it was running in an early warning system in over 80 countries.
Mission 6

Uncertainty in climate modelling

Sources of uncertaintyUncertainty in regional rainfallShare of total uncertaintyInternal variabilityModel uncertaintyScenario uncertainty (small)2020s2090sLead timeSchematic, no values: the shape follows the findings ofHawkins and Sutton (2011) for regional rainfall. Not toscale.
  • IPCC: heavy rainfall has become more frequent and intense since the 1950s over most land areas with enough data to judge (high confidence). Extreme daily rainfall is projected to intensify by about 7% for each 1 °C of warming.
  • Three sources of uncertainty in regional rainfall projections: internal variability (dominant in the first decade), model uncertainty (generally dominant later) and scenario uncertainty (found to be small).
  • So planners use ranges and confidence levels, not single numbers.
Quick check
?Why do flood planners use ranges rather than one projected rainfall figure for 2070?
Mission 6

Structural measures

  • Dams store floodwater in reservoirs and release it slowly.
  • Afforestation increases interception and infiltration upstream; most effective for smaller floods.
  • Channel modification: straightening, widening, deepening or adding relief channels.
  • Levee strengthening: raising and reinforcing embankments.
Mission 6

Planning measures

  • Personal insurance spreads the cost of damage.
  • Flood preparation: household plans, flood-resistant fittings, evacuation routes and drills.
  • Flood warning technology: gauges, radar, satellites, forecast models and phone alerts (screens 6.1–6.2).
  • Land-use planning: keep new building off the floodplain.
Mission 6

Insurance in the UK: Flood Re

  • Flood Re is a reinsurance scheme, "a joint initiative between the Government and insurers", to make flood cover in household policies more affordable.
  • It replaced an earlier arrangement in 2016, and covers homes "built before 1st January 2009", so it does not reward new building on floodplains.
  • It runs until 2039, when insurers should price policies on actual risk.
  • Exam move: insurance spreads losses, but it does not reduce the hazard.
Quick check
?Which is a planning measure, not a structural one?
Mission 6

Example 1: the Rhine, Netherlands — why act?

Room for the RiverLobithNijmegenWaalNederrijn–LekIJsselMeuse Works (separate programme)Measures in the programmeCross-sections: dashed = before, solid = afterDike relocationFloodplain loweringHigh-water channelDepolderingRemoving obstaclesIn each panel the riverchannel is on the left.Schematic cross-sections (not to scale). Design discharge16,000 m³/s at Lobith; measures at 34 places along theIJssel, Waal, Nederrijn and Lek. Map: Natural Earth; placepositions: PDOK Locatieserver.
  • High water in 1993 and in 1995, when more than 250,000 residents had to leave, was "the direct reason" for the Room for the River programme.
  • Design flow: a Rhine discharge of 16,000 m³/s at Lobith, on the German border, with a 1-in-1,250 chance each year.
  • Approach: "give rivers space again" rather than only raising dikes.
Mission 6

Room for the River: what was done

  • Measures at 34 places along the Rhine branches: the IJssel, Waal, Nederrijn and Lek. Total cost: €2.3 billion.
  • Planning 2001–2007; building 2007–2017. The programme was officially completed when the Reevediep high-water channel opened in early 2019.
  • Measures included dike relocation, floodplain lowering, high-water channels, depoldering (returning reclaimed land to the river) and removing obstacles.
  • The Meuse had a separate programme, the Meuse Works.
Mission 6

Nijmegen: moving a dike back

Nijmegen and LentBeforeWaalNijmegen (south bank)DikeLentAfterWaalNijmegen (south bank)Side channel 3 km × 150–200 mIslandNew dike, 350 m inlandFlood levels 35 cm lower. The existing Waal bridgewas extended and new bridges were built.Schematic plan, not to scale: distances across the river areexaggerated and bridge positions and number areindicative. Dimensions and the 35 cm reduction:Climate-ADAPT case study (EEA).
  • At Lent, the dike was moved 350 m inland to make room for a side channel 3 km long and 150–200 m wide.
  • Flood levels fell by 35 cm, beyond the initial 27 cm target. Cost: about €351 million; completed 2016. The new island is "a unique urban river park".
  • Cost to residents: about 50 houses in Lent had to be demolished and their families moved, according to Rijkswaterstaat's account of the programme.
  • Stakeholders' "doubts and opposition were largely addressed" through newsletters, meetings and workshops.
Mission 6

Example 2: the Yangtze, China — why act?

The Yangtze basinThe Yangtze, from the Tibetan Plateau toShanghaiShanghaiTibetan PlateauEnlarged: the middle reach (boxed area above)Three Gorges DamJingzhouDongting LakePoyang LakeMap: Natural Earth; Three Gorges Dam position from theGlobal Dam Watch database (GDW v1). Locations only.
  • China's 1998 floods affected 186 million people and caused 4,150 deaths.
  • The Yangtze, Songhua, Nen, Min and Pearl rivers were all hit.
  • The response combined forest protection, returning land to lakes, dikes and dams.
Mission 6

Yangtze: room for water and trees

  • Afforestation: forest protection and reforestation, and the Grain for Green Program (1999–2020), converting cropland and wasteland on hillslopes to forest and grassland.
  • From 1998 to 2002, 1,461 polders (embanked farmland) were removed and 2.4 million people relocated in the Yangtze basin.
  • This added 2,900 km² of inland water area and a storage capacity of 13 billion m³.
Mission 6

Yangtze: dams and dikes

  • The Three Gorges Dam was completed in 2006. Downstream at Jingzhou, the protection standard rose from a 10-year to a 100-year flood.
  • Across China, river banks protected by well-maintained dikes grew from 76,532 km (1998) to 201,124 km (2016).
  • August 2020: the Three Gorges reservoir had its highest inflow since it was built, 74,600 m³/s. During the 2020 floods the cascade of reservoirs, working together, held back 19.0 billion m³ of flood water. The study's authors include staff of the dam's operating company.
Mission 6

Evaluating the two (AO3)

Two approaches comparedRhine (Netherlands)Yangtze (China)Structural measuresDike relocation (at Lentthe dike was moved 350m inland); high-waterchannel; removingobstaclesThree Gorges Dam(completed 2006); dikes:protected river banks inChina grew from 76,532km (1998) to 201,124 km(2016) (national)Planning measuresDesign flow of 16,000m³/s at Lobith; planning2001–2007Authors call forrisk-based urban planning"in addition to traditionalstructural protection"Land and ecosystem measuresFloodplain lowering;depoldering (reclaimedland returned to the river)Forest protection and theGrain for Green Program(1999–2020); 1,461polders removed(1998–2002), adding2,900 km² of inland waterCost€2.3 billion; about 50houses in Lentdemolished2.4 million peoplerelocated from poldersOutcomeNijmegen: flood levels 35cm lower (target 27 cm)Annual flood deaths fellfrom 3,909 (1990s) to1,454 (2000s), but flooddamage "reached a newpeak during the 2010s"The dike length is a national figure for China, not for theYangtze alone.Sources: Rijkswaterstaat and Climate-ADAPT (Rhine); Duet al. (2019), Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences(Yangtze); each entry as on screens 6.9 to 6.15.
  • China: annual flood deaths fell from 3,909 in the 1990s to 1,454 in the 2000s. But flood damage "reached a new peak during the 2010s".
  • Fewer deaths may also reflect better warnings and evacuation, not only dams and dikes. The authors call for approaches such as risk-based urban planning "in addition to traditional structural protection".
  • Costs of each: in China, 2.4 million people relocated from polders; in the Netherlands, €2.3 billion and homes demolished at Lent.
Quick check
?Which statement best contrasts the two examples?
Mission check

?How did the Dutch respond to the 1995 floods, if not simply with higher dikes?
Mission 7

Mission 7: In January 2018 Cape Town, a city of just over 4 million people, warned that its taps could be turned off in April: "Day Zero". What pushed it to the edge, and how did it pull back?

Make a guess: In January 2018 Cape Town, a city of just over 4 million people, warned that its taps could be turned off in April: "Day Zero". What pushed it to the edge, and how did it pull back?

Mission 7

Quantity and quality

  • Water quantity: how much water is available. Water quality: whether it is safe and fit for use, free of pathogens, harmful chemicals and excess salt.
  • Water security: reliable access to enough water of acceptable quality.
  • 2.1 billion people still lack safely managed drinking water, including 106 million who drink untreated surface water (WHO/UNICEF, 2025).
Mission 7

Physical and economic water scarcity

Physical and economic water scarcityPhysical scarcity: more than 75% of river flowswithdrawnApproaching physical scarcity: more than 60%withdrawnEconomic scarcity: less than 25% withdrawn, butmalnutrition existsLittle or no scarcity: less than 25% withdrawnNot estimatedRedrawn from IWMI (2007), Map 2, Summary of theComprehensive Assessment of Water Management inAgriculture (Watersim model analysis); country bordersomitted.
  • Physical scarcity: more than 75% of river flows are withdrawn for agriculture, industry and households.
  • Economic scarcity: "human, institutional, and financial capital limit access to water even though water in nature is available locally"; less than 25% is withdrawn, but malnutrition exists.
  • Pattern (IWMI, 2007): arid regions are most often physically scarce; "much of Sub-Saharan Africa" is economically scarce. Overcommitted basins such as the Indus and Yellow River are physically scarce.
Quick check
?A region has large rivers and less than 25% of their flow is withdrawn, but many villages lack wells, pipes and treatment. What is this?
Mission 7

Drought: types and causes

  • Drought: a long period of below-normal water availability. Meteorological drought (low rainfall) leads to agricultural drought (dry soils, failing crops) and hydrological drought (low rivers, reservoirs and aquifers).
  • Causes: persistent high pressure and shifted storm tracks; heat increases evapotranspiration.
  • IPCC: human-induced climate change "has contributed to increases in agricultural and ecological droughts in some regions" through higher evapotranspiration (medium confidence).
Mission 7

Cape Town: the causes

Cape Town's droughtStorage in the six largest dams (%)050100100%201471%Next year60%Two yearson38%Three yearsonThree consecutive years of belowaverage rainfall2015–2017Irrigation restrictions for farms: 30%1 Mar 2017Farm restrictions: 50%Oct 2017Farm restrictions: 60%Dec 2017Level 6B restrictions for households1 Feb 2018Day Zero deferred7 Mar 2018Winter rain filled the dams to above75%Winter 2018Source: Ziervogel (2019), Unpacking the Cape TownDrought; rainfall years from Otto et al. (2018). Storagefigures are for 1 November each year.
  • 2015–2017: "three consecutive years of below average rainfall", with "a return time of more than a hundred years".
  • Attribution: climate change made such a drought about three times as likely (95% range 1.5–6).
  • Storage in the six largest dams fell from 100% in 2014 to 71%, 60% and 38% in the following years, measured each 1 November, at the start of the dry season.
  • Demand had grown, including from "increasing numbers of people living in backyard shacks".
Mission 7

Cape Town: the impacts

  • Farms: irrigation restrictions rose to 30% (1 March 2017), then 50% (October 2017) and 60% (December 2017), with lost work "particularly for seasonal labourers".
  • Businesses: commercial and industrial use fell about 20%; non-domestic tariffs more than doubled.
  • Households: from 1 February 2018, a limit of 50 litres per person per day (Level 6B).
  • Day Zero meant turning off taps in neighbourhoods if the dams fell to 13.5% full.
Mission 7

The stakeholders and the response

Who did what in Cape TownWho did whatNational government (Dept of Water andSanitation)Action: Manages the supply system "in cooperationwith the City"; sets allocations, including to farms.Impact: Farm irrigation restrictions rose to 30%, then50% and 60% by December 2017.City of Cape TownAction: Restrictions, tariffs and campaigns.Impact: Some officials said the campaign "and thepanic it caused, came at a high price".FarmersAction: Made cuts in irrigation.Impact: Lost work, "particularly for seasonallabourers".ResidentsAction: Saved water.Impact: Daily use fell sharply (below).BusinessesAction: Saved water.Impact: Commercial and industrial use fell about20%; non-domestic tariffs more than doubled.Daily water use in Cape TownEarly 2016: over1,000 MlLowest: justbelow 500 MlMl = million litres per day. Bars drawn at 1,000 and 500Ml.Source: Ziervogel (2019), Unpacking the Cape TownDrought. Ml = million litres.
  • The supply system is managed by the national Department of Water and Sanitation "in cooperation with the City".
  • City: restrictions, tariffs and campaigns. National government: allocations, including to farms. Farmers: cuts. Residents and businesses: saving water.
  • Daily use fell from over 1,000 Ml (million litres) in early 2016 to "just below 500Ml a few times", "about 50% of the pre-drought usage".
  • On 7 March 2018, Day Zero was deferred; winter rain then "filled the dams to above 75%". Critique: some officials said the campaign "and the panic it caused, came at a high price".
Calculate
aCape Town's daily use fell from about 1,000 Ml to about 500 Ml. Calculate the reduction as a percentage.
bIf 4 million people each used exactly 50 litres a day, calculate total household use in Ml (1 Ml = 1,000,000 litres).
Quick check
?Which explanation of Cape Town's crisis is best supported by the evidence?
Mission check

?What pushed Cape Town towards Day Zero, and how did it pull back?
Mission 8

Mission 8: Every summer, parts of Chesapeake Bay, USA, become "dead zones" with too little oxygen for fish and shellfish. Much of the cause starts on land, in a watershed spanning six states. How can a farm field suffocate a bay?

Make a guess: Every summer, parts of Chesapeake Bay, USA, become "dead zones" with too little oxygen for fish and shellfish. Much of the cause starts on land, in a watershed spanning six states. How can a farm field suffocate a bay?

Mission 8

Eutrophication

EutrophicationFertiliser and manurenitrogen andphosphorus on fieldsRunoffwashes nutrients intorivers, lakes and seasNutrient-rich waterfuels the growth ofalgae bloomsAlgal bloomshades underwaterplantsAlgae die and sinkdead algae sinkBacterialdecompositionbacteria consumeoxygen until little ornone is leftHypoxic dead zoneless than 2 mg/L dissolved oxygenSteps and the 2 mg/L threshold as described by theChesapeake Bay Program (S38).
  • Fertiliser and manure wash nitrogen and phosphorus off fields into rivers, lakes and seas.
  • The nutrients "can fuel the growth of algae blooms" that shade underwater plants.
  • Dead algae sink and "are decomposed by bacteria that consume oxygen until there is little or none left".
  • Water with less than 2 mg/L of dissolved oxygen is low-oxygen (hypoxia): a dead zone.
Mission 8

Chesapeake Bay: the sources

Chesapeake Bay: the sourcesChesapeake BayDCNew YorkPennsylvaniaMDDEWest VirginiaVirginiaAgriculture's share of the load, 2024 modelling(%)Nitrogen46%Phosphorus29%0255075100Watershed boundary: US Fish and Wildlife Service opendata; states: Natural Earth. Shares: Chesapeake BayProgram (2024 modelling). The watershed spans sixstates and the District of Columbia.
  • Agriculture is "the single largest source of nitrogen pollution entering the Chesapeake Bay".
  • 2024 modelling: agriculture supplied about 46% of nitrogen and 29% of phosphorus loads.
  • By the Program's 2024 model data, the largest source of phosphorus and sediment is the "natural" sector, such as stream beds and banks. (The same page also calls agriculture "the single largest source of nutrient and sediment pollution".) The watershed spans six states and the District of Columbia.
Mission 8

Chesapeake Bay: the stakeholders

  • Federal government: on 29 December 2010 the EPA set a "pollution diet" (a Total Maximum Daily Load), with measures to be in place by 2025.
  • States: each plans how to cut its share.
  • Farmers: best management practices such as cover crops, forest buffers, fencing livestock out of streams and nutrient management plans.
Mission 8

Chesapeake Bay: the results so far

  • By 2023, practices in place had achieved 57% of the nitrogen and 67% of the phosphorus reductions needed.
  • Sediment goals were met Bay-wide.
  • The 2025 goal "will not be met on time".
Quick check
?Why is farm pollution harder to cut than pollution from a factory?
Mission 8

Salinization

SalinizationHow irrigation can salinize soilWater table rises(dotted: earlier level)Irrigation waterappliedEvaporationSalts left at thesurfaceCapillary rise of saltygroundwaterOver-irrigation and poor drainage raise the water table.RemediesDrains control the watertableMulch layerMulch reducesevaporationSchematic: mechanism only, not to scale. Remedies asdescribed by the FAO (S42).
  • In hot, dry regions, irrigation water evaporates and leaves its salts in the soil.
  • Over-irrigation and poor drainage raise the water table; salty groundwater then rises by capillary action towards the surface.
  • Remedies include drains to control the water table and mulching to "reduce evaporation losses and thus decrease or prevent soil salinization".
  • FAO's 2021 global map: more than 424 million ha of topsoil and 833 million ha of subsoil are salt-affected, from natural and human causes (118 countries).
Quick check
?Which farming practice is most likely to cause salinization in a hot, dry region?
Mission check

?How can a farm field suffocate a bay?
Mission 9

Mission 9: The Aral Sea was once the fourth-largest lake in the world. In 2014 the eastern part of its southern basin disappeared completely. What drained it?

Make a guess: The Aral Sea was once the fourth-largest lake in the world. In 2014 the eastern part of its southern basin disappeared completely. What drained it?

Mission 9

The Aral Sea: a lake drained by economic growth

The Aral Sea: 1960 shoreline and 2014 waterNorth Aral SeaWestern lobe ofthe South AralSeaEastern lobe of theSouth Aral Sea:disappeared in2014Kok-Aral dam(2005)Syr DaryaAmu Darya1960 shoreline (approximate)Water in 201450 kmTraced from NASA Earth Observatory satellite images(MODIS, Terra): the 1960 line is NASA's approximateshoreline; water is from the August 2014 image. Rivers(Natural Earth) and the dam (published coordinates) areplaced approximately.
  • In the 1960s the Soviet Union diverted the Amu Darya and Syr Darya to turn desert into farms "for cotton and other crops".
  • The Aral Sea, once "the fourth largest in the world", shrank. In 2014 the eastern lobe of the South Aral Sea completely disappeared.
  • Fisheries collapsed. Salty dust from the exposed bed settled on fields, "degrading the soil", so croplands "had to be flushed with larger and larger volumes of river water": salinization feeding back on demand.
Mission 9

Aral: a partial recovery (synthesis)

  • Kazakhstan's Kok-Aral dike and dam, finished in 2005, separates the North Aral from the South Aral.
  • North Aral water levels "rebounded significantly" in 2005–2006 and its fisheries recovered, but flow into the South Aral was limited.
  • One part of the lake gained at another's expense: a spatial interaction.
Mission 9

Aquifers under pressure: the High Plains, USA

The High Plains aquiferSouthDakotaWyomingNebraskaColoradoKansasOklahomaNewMexicoTexasDecline of more than 100 ftDecline of 50 to 100 ftDecline of 25 to 50 ftDecline of 5 to 25 ftLittle change (within 5 ft)Rise of more than 5 ftArea-weighted average change across the aquifer: adecline of 15.8 ft (about 4.8 m).Water-level change data: McGuire (2017), USGS ScientificInvestigations Report 2017-5040; classes chosen for thisdiagram. States: Natural Earth.
  • The High Plains aquifer underlies parts of eight states, from South Dakota and Wyoming to Texas.
  • Water levels began to fall soon after large-scale groundwater irrigation began, around 1950.
  • From before development to 2015: an area-weighted average decline of 15.8 feet (about 4.8 m), and about 273.2 million acre-feet less recoverable water in storage.
Mission 9

Migration and an aquifer: Las Vegas Valley, USA

  • A new period of growth began in 1932 with the building of Boulder (Hoover) Dam, which "brought workers to Las Vegas from throughout America".
  • A "seemingly unlimited supply of water and power" then attracted industry, the military and gambling in the 1940s and 1950s.
  • In 1999 it was "the fastest growing metropolitan area in the United States".
Mission 9

Las Vegas: pumping and its effects

  • By about 1955, wells were pumping nearly 40,000 acre-feet a year, more than the estimated natural recharge of 25,000–35,000 acre-feet.
  • By 1990, water levels had fallen more than 300 feet in places; the land had subsided nearly 6 feet since 1935.
  • Responses: water imported from Lake Mead and, from 1988, treated water injected into the aquifer.
Calculate

Using screen 9.5, pumping was about 40,000 acre-feet a year and natural recharge 25,000–35,000 acre-feet.

aCalculate the smallest possible annual overdraft (pumping minus recharge), in acre-feet.
bCalculate the largest possible annual overdraft, in acre-feet.
Mission 9

Lake Chad: check the evidence (AO3)

  • A 2020 satellite study reports that Lake Chad shrank to less than 2,000 km² in the 1980s, a fall of more than 90% in area, citing earlier work.
  • For 2001–2018 it found the southern pool "not shrinking but, on the contrary, slightly increasing"; groundwater contributes about 70% of the lake's annual change in water storage.
  • Its conclusion: "for now Lake Chad is not disappearing".
  • Lesson: a dramatic figure may describe one period. Check its date and method.
Quick check
?A website says "Lake Chad has lost 90% of its water and is still disappearing." What is the best response?
Mission check

?What drained the Aral Sea?
Mission 10

Mission 10: About 85% of the Nile's water starts in Ethiopia, yet a 1959 agreement shared it between Egypt and Sudan. Who decides how it is used now, and what would make a deal work?

Make a guess: About 85% of the Nile's water starts in Ethiopia, yet a 1959 agreement shared it between Egypt and Sudan. Who decides how it is used now, and what would make a deal work?

Mission 10

Why shared rivers cause conflict

  • Upstream states control flow and timing; downstream states depend on what arrives.
  • Pressure grows with population, irrigation, hydropower and drought.
  • Stakeholders: national governments, farmers, cities, power companies, basin organisations and mediators.
  • Responses range from treaties and basin commissions to diplomatic disputes.
Mission 10

The Nile basin

The Nile basinBlue Nile:about 55%White Nile:about 32%Atbara:about 13%GERDHigh AswanDamEGYPTSUDANSOUTHSUDANETHIOPIALake VictoriaShares of the Nile flow are about 55% (BlueNile), 32% (White Nile) and 13% (Atbara).Shares: Wheeler et al. (2020). Dam positions: Global DamWatch (GDW v1). Rivers and lakes: Natural Earth.
  • Natural flow at Aswan averaged 86.5 billion m³ a year from 1900 to 2018, ranging from 45.6 to 120 billion.
  • The Blue Nile contributes about 55%, the White Nile 32% and the Atbara 13%.
  • "85% of Nile waters originate in Ethiopia", but "nearly all consumptive use occurs downstream in Egypt and Sudan".
  • The Blue Nile and Atbara give 68%, so the 85% presumably includes Ethiopian water reaching the White Nile through the Sobat (Baro–Akobo); the paper does not break it down.
Mission 10

The 1959 agreement

  • Egypt and Sudan's agreement, signed in Cairo on 8 November 1959, assumed a mean flow at Aswan of about 84 billion m³ a year.
  • Once the High Aswan Dam (162 billion m³ of storage) was working, it gave 55.5 billion m³ a year to Egypt and 18.5 billion to Sudan, with storage losses estimated at 10 billion.
  • "Not being signatories, Ethiopia and other upstream states do not recognize this agreement".
Calculate
?Using screen 10.3, calculate Egypt's share of the total water accounted for in the 1959 agreement (both allocations plus storage losses), as a percentage to 1 decimal place.
Mission 10

The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD)

Two great reservoirsStorage of the two reservoirsBillion m³High Aswan Dam162Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD)74 in total, 59 active050100150Dashed line: mean natural flow of the Nile at Aswan,1900 to 2018, 86.5 billion m³ a year.Source: Wheeler et al. (2020), Nature Communications 11:5222. Storage is a volume; the Aswan flow is a volumeper year.
  • Ethiopia began building the GERD on the Blue Nile in 2011. Installed capacity: 5,150 MW, expected to generate about 16 TWh a year.
  • Reservoir: 74 billion m³ in total, 59 billion of it active; the active storage alone is about 1.2 times the Blue Nile's mean annual flow at the dam site.
  • Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed inaugurated the dam on 9 September 2025 (Ethiopian News Agency).
Mission 10

The stakeholders' interests (Ev, Sy)

  • Ethiopia: electricity demand projected to rise from 11.1 TWh (2020) to 27.3 TWh (2030); the GERD's 5,150 MW adds to 4,400 MW of existing capacity.
  • Egypt: on the day of the inauguration, its foreign minister wrote to the UN Security Council that Egypt is "entirely dependent on the Nile River for its survival", with water per person "approaching the absolute water scarcity threshold of 500 cubic metres".
  • Sudan: smoother Blue Nile flows could eliminate flood losses, raise hydropower and add summer irrigation water.
  • Each country's interest depends on where it sits in the basin: a spatial interaction.
Mission 10

Attempts at a resolution

Towards a resolution?Egypt and Sudan sign theagreement in CairoEgypt and Sudan only8 Nov 1959Nile Basin Initiative founded10 basin countries22 Feb 1999Cooperative Framework Agreementopened for signatureEgypt and Sudan rejected that step2010Ethiopia begins building the GERD2011Cooperative Framework Agreemententers into forceSix parties; Egypt and Sudan are notparties13 Oct 2024GERD inaugurated; Egypt writes tothe UN Security Council9 Sep 2025Sources: UN Treaty Series (1959 agreement); Nile BasinInitiative (1999, 2010, 2024); Wheeler et al. (2020);Ethiopian News Agency (2025); UN Security Councildocument S/2025/562.
  • The Nile Basin Initiative, founded on 22 February 1999, links 10 basin countries.
  • Its Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA) sets out "the principle of equitable and reasonable utilization" and "the obligation not to cause significant harm".
  • Opened for signature in 2010 (Egypt and Sudan rejected that step), it entered into force on 13 October 2024, after South Sudan acceded as the sixth party. Egypt and Sudan are not parties.
  • In 2020 a study described the GERD talks between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan as "difficult, ongoing negotiations".
Mission 10

What the evidence suggests (AO3)

  • Modelling: once filled, the GERD "will benefit Ethiopia and Sudan without significantly affecting water users in Egypt".
  • But "management of multi-year droughts will require careful coordination", because both reservoirs could be low at once.
  • So the critical issue is less the dam itself than agreed rules for droughts and data sharing.
Quick check
?Which conclusion is best supported by the evidence on these screens?
Mission check

?What does the evidence suggest is needed to manage the Nile's water now?
Mission 11

Mission 11: The Lower Mekong's fisheries land an estimated 2.3 million tonnes of fish a year, worth about US$11 billion. Its hydropower capacity could more than double. Can one river be both a great fishery and a giant power station?

Make a guess: The Lower Mekong's fisheries land an estimated 2.3 million tonnes of fish a year, worth about US$11 billion. Its hydropower capacity could more than double. Can one river be both a great fishery and a giant power station?

Mission 11

Local participation: why it matters

  • SDG target 6.1: "universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all" by 2030.
  • Target 6.b: "Support and strengthen the participation of local communities in improving water and sanitation management".
  • Local users know their sources, can maintain schemes, and are more likely to use water efficiently when they share the decisions.
Mission 11

Participation in different development contexts

Participation in three contextsParticipation in three contextsIndiaLower-middle incomeJal Jeevan Mission: the aim is a tap connection forevery rural home, "based on a communityapproach", with local contributions "in cash, kindand/ or labour".South AfricaUpper-middle incomeCape Town's residents and businesses halved thecity's water use in a drought: mostly compliancewith rules, not a share in decisions.AustraliaHigh incomeMurray–Darling: the Productivity Commissioncalls on governments to "partner and sharedecision making with First Nations people".Income groups: World Bank country classification (API).Examples: Jal Jeevan Mission (India); Ziervogel (2019);Productivity Commission (2024).
  • India (lower-middle income): the Jal Jeevan Mission aims to give every rural home a tap connection. It is "based on a community approach", with local contributions "in cash, kind and/ or labour".
  • South Africa (upper-middle income): Cape Town's residents and businesses halved the city's water use in a drought (Mission 7). This was mostly compliance with rules, not a share in decisions.
  • Australia (high income): the Productivity Commission calls on Murray–Darling governments to "partner and share decision making with First Nations people" (Mission 12).
Mission 11

Efficiency and sustainable use

  • Efficiency: drip irrigation, fixing leaks, metering and pricing, reusing treated water.
  • Sustainable use: take water no faster than it is replaced (compare Las Vegas and the High Plains, Mission 9).
  • Affordability: higher prices cut waste but weigh most on poorer households, so pricing needs to protect basic needs.
Quick check
?Which is the clearest example of strengthening local community participation?
Mission 11

Multipurpose dams: costs and benefits

  • Benefits: hydropower, flood control, storage for irrigation and supply, navigation.
  • Costs: displaced communities, flooded land and habitats, blocked fish migration, trapped sediment and changed flows downstream.
  • Benefits and costs often fall on different places and people.
Mission 11

The Mekong and its dams

The Mekong and its damsTonlé SapMekongDeltaCHINAMYANMARLAOSTHAILANDCAMBODIAVIETNAMDams on the MekongUpper Mekong (the Lancang), China12 operational dams on the main streamLower Mekong basin (MRC count)88 hydropower projects operating, 20 underconstruction, 14 plannedThe river runs nearly 5,000 km from the TibetanPlateau through six countries.Counts: Mekong River Commission (MRC). Dam positionsare not plotted: no sourced coordinates matching thesecounts were found. Rivers and lakes: Natural Earth.
  • The Mekong runs nearly 5,000 km from the Tibetan Plateau through six countries.
  • China has 12 operational dams on the upper Mekong's main stream (the Lancang).
  • Lao PDR has 98 hydropower projects, by the MRC's count, with 64% of the lower basin's installed capacity, for its own use and export.
Mission 11

The lower-basin pipeline

  • Lower Mekong: 88 hydropower projects operating, with over 13,257 MW installed.
  • A further 20 are under construction and 14 planned.
  • If all are built, capacity could reach 27,302 MW.
Calculate
?Using screen 11.7, by what factor could the Lower Mekong's installed hydropower capacity grow? Give 2 decimal places.
Mission 11

Who gains and who loses? (Ev, Sy)

Costs and benefits by placeWho gains and who loses along the riverUpstream: damsDownstream: deltaGains: mostly to power users and governments• Energy security• Revenue from selling electricity to neighbours• Rural electricity• Some flood and drought regulationLosses: mostly on fishers and delta farmers• Dams trap sediment that maintains the fertility ofthe Mekong Delta• Disrupted fish migration "threatens the foodsecurity and income of millions"About 80% of the nearly 65 million people in thelower basin depend on the river.Evidence gap: the MRC says information on the impactof trapped sediment in the lower basin "is limited".Source: Mekong River Commission (MRC).
  • Gains: energy security, revenue from selling electricity to neighbours, rural electricity, some flood and drought regulation.
  • Losses: "Dams trap sediment" that maintains the fertility of the Mekong Delta; disrupted fish migration "threatens the food security and income of millions". About 80% of the nearly 65 million people in the lower basin depend on the river.
  • Evidence gap: the MRC says reservoirs in the upper and lower basin "have trapped most of the sediment", but information on the impact in the lower basin "is limited".
  • Gains go mostly to power users and governments; losses fall mostly on fishers and delta farmers downstream.
Mission 11

Governance: the Mekong River Commission

  • The MRC was set up in 1995 by Cambodia, Lao PDR, Thailand and Viet Nam. China, upstream, is not one of these four members.
  • Its procedures for notification and prior consultation "provide independent reviews of individual projects" and share information.
  • It also issues design guidance for mainstream dams, to "avoid, minimize, and mitigate" impacts.
Quick check
?Which is the strongest evaluation of dam building on the Mekong?
Mission check

?Can the Mekong be both a great fishery and a giant power station?
Mission 12

Mission 12: Since 1970 the world has lost about 22% of its wetlands. Can a plan for a whole river basin bring a wetland back?

Make a guess: Since 1970 the world has lost about 22% of its wetlands. Can a plan for a whole river basin bring a wetland back?

Mission 12

Integrated drainage basin management (IDBM)

Integrated drainage basin managementSector by sectorFarmsTownsIndustryEnvironmentEach sector plans for itself.Integrated drainage basin managementOne basin planEnvironmentFarmsTownsIndustryFirst NationsGovernmentsAll stakeholders take part in one plan for land andwater use across the whole basin.Generic schematic, not data. IDBM plans land and wateruse across a whole basin rather than river by river orsector by sector.
  • IDBM plans land and water use across a whole basin rather than river by river or sector by sector.
  • It balances water for the environment, farms, towns, industry and culture, and involves all the stakeholders.
  • It is part of SDG target 6.5: integrated water resources management "at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation".
Mission 12

Case study: the Murray–Darling Basin Plan, Australia

  • The basin spans parts of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory, each with its own water plans.
  • Under the Water Act 2007, the Basin Plan came into effect in November 2012, aiming for "a healthy, working Basin".
  • To get there, governments agreed to recover 2,750 GL a year for the environment (about a 20% cut in water for consumptive use) and an additional 450 GL a year.
  • Benefits by 2023: recovered water "improved river flows, connectivity, and ecosystem and biodiversity outcomes".
Mission 12

Murray–Darling: shortfalls (Ev)

Murray–Darling: recovery against targetsACTNew SouthWalesVictoriaQueenslandSouthAustraliaWater recovery: targets and progressGigalitres (GL) a year; all bars on one scaleRecovery target for the environment: 2,750 GL ayearAdditional target: 450 GL a yearRecovered: 26 GL a yearSupply-measure offset: 605 GL a yearLess than half achievedDashed line: half of the 605 GL a year.Source: Productivity Commission (2024), Murray–DarlingBasin Plan: Implementation review 2023. Basin outline:Murray–Darling Basin Authority; states: Natural Earth.
  • The Productivity Commission (2024): the Plan "will not be fully implemented within the original timeframe or budget".
  • Only 26 GL a year of the extra 450 GL had been recovered, and less than half of a 605 GL supply-measure offset.
  • 10 of 20 New South Wales water resource plans, due in 2019, were still not in place.
Mission 12

Murray–Darling: who bears the costs (Ev)

  • Water purchases should be gradual "to avoid driving water market disruption and community adjustment pressures": farming towns bear costs.
  • First Nations interests need stronger partnership and shared decision making.
  • So the plan's environmental gains depend on who gives up water, and how they are helped.
Calculate
?Using screen 12.3, what percentage of the extra 450 GL a year had been recovered? Give 1 decimal place.
Quick check
?Which statement best weighs the Murray–Darling Basin Plan?
Mission 12

Wetlands under pressure

Global wetland lossGlobal wetlands since 1970Lost since 1970about 22% (411million ha)Remaining1.4 billion haLosses continue at 0.52% a year.Source: Convention on Wetlands, Global Wetland Outlook2025. Bar lengths drawn in proportion to 411 million haand 1.4 billion ha.
  • Since 1970, about 411 million ha of wetlands, roughly 22% of the global total, have been lost, and losses continue at 0.52% a year.
  • About 25% of the remaining wetlands are in poor condition. Pressures: agricultural expansion, pollution, infrastructure, hydrological disruption and climate change.
  • The remaining 1.4 billion ha provide ecosystem services worth up to US$39 trillion a year: they regulate floods, store carbon and purify water.
Mission 12

The Ramsar Convention

  • The Convention on Wetlands was adopted at Ramsar, Iran, on 2 February 1971, and came into force in 1975.
  • It has 172 Contracting Parties and over 2,530 Wetlands of International Importance, covering about 2.58 million km², roughly 14–17% of the world's wetlands.
  • Parties commit to wise use and to maintaining the ecological character of listed sites.
  • Limitation: listing a site does not control the water that reaches it from upstream.
Mission 12

Case study: the Everglades, Florida

The Everglades: then, now and plannedThenWater flowedslowly from theKissimmee Riverto Florida Bay:the "River ofGrass".NowCanals andlevees drain landfor farms andcities.PlannedCERP (2000): theEAA Reservoirwill store andtreat releasesfrom LakeOkeechobee.Schematic: arrows show the idea of sheet flow, notmeasured flow paths. Key: big blue lake = LakeOkeechobee, orange = Everglades Agricultural Area,green = Everglades National Park, small dark blue = EAAReservoir. Boundaries: Everglades National Park,Everglades Agricultural Area and EAA Reservoir fromstate and district GIS layers; lake from the USGS NationalHydrography Dataset. Reservoir capacity: South FloridaWater Management District.
  • Water once "flowed slowly from the Kissimmee River to Florida Bay", forming a "River of Grass".
  • The South Florida ecosystem covers about 18,000 square miles and is the primary water source for 9 million residents. Everglades National Park (1947) protects 1.5 million acres.
  • Pressures: "an extensive network of canals and levees to drain land for agricultural and residential development", and "flood control and water supply needs for a growing population base".
  • Results include phosphorus pollution that spreads cattail, severe wildfires in drier areas that "consume peat soils", and the loss of tree islands in wetter areas.
Mission 12

The Everglades: the restoration plan (CERP)

  • The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), authorized in 2000, is a federal–state partnership restoring the "quantity, quality, timing, and distribution" of water.
  • It has 68 components.
  • Example: the EAA Reservoir (240,000 acre-feet of storage) will store and treat releases from Lake Okeechobee.
Mission 12

The Everglades: funding and the future

  • Funding: $2 billion in federal CERP funding by September 2021, then $1.098 billion from the November 2021 infrastructure law.
  • Planning now includes resilience to sea-level rise.
  • The Kissimmee restoration (5.8) is at the head of the same system.
Quick check
?Which is the main reason the Everglades can be restored only by working across the whole basin?
Mission 12

Scales of water management (Sy/Ev)

  • Personal: Cape Town's 50 litres a day. Local: India's village tap-water schemes.
  • National: Room for the River; the Murray–Darling Basin Plan; CERP.
  • International: the Nile CFA; the Mekong River Commission. Global: SDG 6; the Ramsar Convention.
  • Exam move: in a "to what extent" answer, judge which scale made the difference, and for whom.
Mission check

?Can a basin-wide plan bring a wetland back?
Exam technique

How Option A is examined (Paper 1)

Paper 1 at a glanceStandard level (SL)Higher level (HL)OptionsTwo optionsThree optionsTime1 hour 30 minutes2 hours 15 minutesMarks40 marks60 marksEach option20 marks: 10 (structuredquestion) + 10 (extendedanswer from a choice oftwo); about 45 minutesSame: 20 marks peroption (10 + 10); about 45minutesShare of the final grade35%35%Source: IB Geography guide (first assessment 2019,updated 2022).
  • Paper 1 covers the options: two at SL (1 hour 30 minutes, 40 marks) and three at HL (2 hours 15 minutes, 60 marks). It is 35% of the grade at both levels.
  • About 45 minutes per option, and 20 marks per option: a structured question (10 marks) and one extended answer from a choice of two (10 marks).
Exam technique

What the top band rewards (question 2, 9–10 marks)

  • "In-depth and question-specific (topic and command term)".
  • Examples, statistics and details are integrated and explained, not listed.
  • Evaluation weighs other perspectives and the strengths and weaknesses of evidence, as with the forest–flood debate or Lake Chad's "90%".
  • The conclusion is balanced and matches the evidence. Maps and diagrams are annotated and support the argument.
Recap

The big ideas

  • A drainage basin is an open system of stores and flows; groundwater and ice keep rivers flowing (M1).
  • Discharge and channel efficiency set velocity; velocity sets erosion, transport and deposition (M2), which build waterfalls, meanders, levees and deltas (M3).
  • Geology, seasonality and land use shape hydrographs and flood risk (M4–M5); better forecasts and two contrasting strategies manage it (M6).
  • Scarcity can be physical or economic; quality and quantity both matter (Cape Town, Chesapeake, Aral) (M7–M9).
  • Shared rivers need agreed rules (Nile); dams, IDBM and wetland plans bring costs and benefits to different people (M10–M12).

Final screen. Score, the mission list ticked, and "Next: test yourself in the Verify stage" (links to the Verify quiz).

🏆

Mini-lesson complete!

⭐⭐⭐

You've worked through Freshwater (drainage basins) for IB Diploma Geography SL and HL. 🎉

  1. Mission 1At any moment, rivers hold only about 0.006% of Earth's fresh water. So how does a river keep flowing through weeks without rain?
  2. Mission 2A silt grain is one-hundredth the width of a coarse sand grain, yet water must flow about three times as fast to pick it up. Why?
  3. Mission 3Niagara Falls has moved about 7 miles (11 km) upstream in about 12,000 years. How does a waterfall move backwards?
  4. Mission 4On 23 December 2013, 43–45 mm of rain fell on two river basins in southern England. Within a day, one river surged to one of its highest flows since records began; the other barely rose, and peaked only in mid-February after weeks more rain. Why did the same storm have such different effects?
  5. Mission 5A study found that urbanization made Hurricane Harvey-scale flooding in Houston's basins about 21 times as likely in 2017. How can a city make a flood worse?
  6. Mission 6In 1995, more than 250,000 people in the Netherlands had to leave their homes as the rivers rose. The Dutch response was not simply higher dikes. What did they do?
  7. Mission 7In January 2018 Cape Town, a city of just over 4 million people, warned that its taps could be turned off in April: "Day Zero". What pushed it to the edge, and how did it pull back?
  8. Mission 8Every summer, parts of Chesapeake Bay, USA, become "dead zones" with too little oxygen for fish and shellfish. Much of the cause starts on land, in a watershed spanning six states. How can a farm field suffocate a bay?
  9. Mission 9The Aral Sea was once the fourth-largest lake in the world. In 2014 the eastern part of its southern basin disappeared completely. What drained it?
  10. Mission 10About 85% of the Nile's water starts in Ethiopia, yet a 1959 agreement shared it between Egypt and Sudan. Who decides how it is used now, and what would make a deal work?
  11. Mission 11The Lower Mekong's fisheries land an estimated 2.3 million tonnes of fish a year, worth about US$11 billion. Its hydropower capacity could more than double. Can one river be both a great fishery and a giant power station?
  12. Mission 12Since 1970 the world has lost about 22% of its wetlands. Can a plan for a whole river basin bring a wetland back?

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Verify stage.

📣 Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

→ Back to IB Geography · SL

Sources for this lesson are listed at the bottom of the page.

Sources (67)

The sources behind the facts and figures in this lesson.

  1. S1 IBO, Geography guide (first assessment 2019; updated 2022)
  2. S2 USGS Water Science School, "Where is Earth's water?" (table from Shiklomanov, in Gleick, Water in Crisis, 1993)
  3. S3 Winter T.C., Harvey J.W., Franke O.L., Alley W.M. (1998), Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource, USGS Circular 1139, Box B
  4. S4 Lutz A.F., Immerzeel W.W., Shrestha A.B., Bierkens M.F.P. (2014), "Consistent increase in High Asia's runoff due to increasing glacier melt and precipitation", Nature Climate Change 4: 587–592
  5. S5 Immerzeel W.W. et al. (2020), "Importance and vulnerability of the world's water towers", Nature 577: 364–369 (online 9 Dec 2019); Utrecht University news release
  6. S6 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, National River Flow Archive (NRFA), station 39019 Lambourn at Shaw: station metadata, gauged daily flows (1962–2019) and catchment daily rainfall (API, read 22 Oct 2026)
  7. S7 UKCEH NRFA, station 40005 Beult at Stilebridge: station metadata, gauged daily flows (1958–2025) and catchment daily rainfall (API, read 22 Oct 2026)
  8. S8 USGS Water Science School, "How streamflow is measured"
  9. S9 American Meteorological Society, Glossary of Meteorology, "hydraulic radius"
  10. S10 Leopold L.B. (1953), "Downstream change of velocity in rivers", American Journal of Science 251(8): 606–624 (USGS abstract)
  11. S11 Earle S. (2019), Physical Geology, 2nd ed., BCcampus: 13.3 "Stream erosion and deposition" and 13.4 "Stream types"
  12. S12 Subramanian V. (1996), "The sediment load of Indian rivers: an update", IAHS Publ. 236
  13. S13 New York State Museum, "Niagara Falls"
  14. S14 Bosboom J. and Stive M.J.F., Coastal Dynamics, TU Delft Open Textbook, 2.7.3 "Classification of deltas" (citing Galloway, 1975)
  15. S15 Couvillion B.R., Beck H., Schoolmaster D., Fischer M. (2017), Land area change in coastal Louisiana (1932 to 2016), USGS SIM 3381
  16. S16 Zhang W., Villarini G., Vecchi G.A., Smith J.A. (2018), "Urbanization exacerbated the rainfall and flooding caused by hurricane Harvey in Houston", Nature 563: 384–388
  17. S17 Blake E.S. and Zelinsky D.A. (2018), Hurricane Harvey (AL092017) Tropical Cyclone Report, National Hurricane Center, NOAA (9 May 2018)
  18. S18 FAO and CIFOR (2005), Forests and floods: drowning in fiction or thriving on facts?
  19. S19 Bradshaw C.J.A., Sodhi N.S., Peh K.S.-H., Brook B.W. (2007), "Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world", Global Change Biology 13(11): 2379–2395
  20. S20 van Dijk A.I.J.M. et al. (2009), "Forest–flood relation still tenuous", Global Change Biology 15(1): 110–115
  21. S21 South Florida Water Management District, "Kissimmee River"
  22. S22 USGS Water Science School, "Floods and recurrence intervals"
  23. S23 Bauer P., Thorpe A., Brunet G. (2015), "The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction", Nature 525: 47–55
  24. S24 IPCC (2021), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers (A.3.2, B.2.2, B.2.4)
  25. S25 Hawkins E. and Sutton R.T. (2011), "The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change", Climate Dynamics 37: 407–418
  26. S26 Nearing G. et al. (2024), "Global prediction of extreme floods in ungauged watersheds", Nature 627: 559–563
  27. S27 Interreg Europe, good practice "Room for the River" (owner: Rijkswaterstaat, Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management; published 9 Dec 2025)
  28. S28 Rijkswaterstaat news (Jan 2025), "Thirty years later, the 1995 high water evacuation remains unforgettable"
  29. S29 Rijkswaterstaat, "Major Projects and maintenance: Room for the River" (presentation, M. Hoenderkamp; undated)
  30. S30 European Climate Adaptation Platform (Climate-ADAPT, EEA), case study "Room for the River Waal – protecting the city of Nijmegen"
  31. S31 Du S., Cheng X., Huang Q., Chen R., Ward P.J., Aerts J.C.J.H. (2019), "Brief communication: Rethinking the 1998 China floods to prepare for a nonstationary future", Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 19: 715–719
  32. S32 Zhang H. et al. (2022), "Realizing the full reservoir operation potential during the 2020 Yangtze river floods", Scientific Reports 12: 2822
  33. S33 Flood Re, home page, "What is Flood Re?" and "Eligibility criteria"
  34. S34 Molden D. (ed.) (2007), Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, Summary (IWMI/Earthscan)
  35. S35 WHO and UNICEF joint news release (26 Aug 2025), "1 in 4 people globally still lack access to safe drinking water"
  36. S36 Otto F.E.L. et al. (2018), "Anthropogenic influence on the drivers of the Western Cape drought 2015–2017", Environmental Research Letters 13: 124010
  37. S37 Ziervogel G. (2019), Unpacking the Cape Town Drought: Lessons Learned, African Centre for Cities for the Cities Support Programme, National Treasury, South Africa
  38. S38 Chesapeake Bay Program, "Agricultural runoff" and "Dead zones"
  39. S39 US EPA, "Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)"
  40. S40 Chesapeake Bay Program, ChesapeakeProgress, "Watershed Implementation Plans" outcome (2023 data)
  41. S41 Wheeler K.G., Jeuland M., Hall J.W., Zagona E., Whittington D. (2020), "Understanding and managing new risks on the Nile with the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam", Nature Communications 11: 5222
  42. S42 FAO Global Soil Partnership, Global Map of Salt-affected Soils (GSASmap v1.0, 2021); FAO Soils Portal, "More information on salt-affected soils"
  43. S43 Pham-Duc B., Sylvestre F., Papa F., Frappart F., Bouchez C., Crétaux J.-F. (2020), "The Lake Chad hydrology under current climate change", Scientific Reports 10: 5498
  44. S44 McGuire V.L. (2017), Water-level and recoverable water in storage changes, High Plains aquifer, predevelopment to 2015 and 2013–15, USGS SIR 2017–5040
  45. S45 Pavelko M.T., Wood D.B., Laczniak R.J. (1999), "Las Vegas, Nevada: Gambling with water in the desert", in Galloway D. et al., Land Subsidence in the United States, USGS Circular 1182
  46. S46 Nile Basin Initiative, "About us" and "Cooperative Framework Agreement"
  47. S47 Ethiopian News Agency (state agency), "PM Abiy Inaugurates Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD)" (9 Sep 2025)
  48. S48 Mekong River Commission, "Hydropower"
  49. S49 Mekong River Commission, "Mekong River Basin"
  50. S50 Mekong River Commission, "Sediment monitoring"
  51. S51 Mekong River Commission, "Fisheries"
  52. S52 United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals, "Goal 6" (targets and indicators)
  53. S53 Government of India, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Jal Jeevan Mission, home page and "About JJM"
  54. S54 World Bank, country classification (incomeLevel) via the World Bank API, read 22 Oct 2026
  55. S55 Productivity Commission (2024), Murray–Darling Basin Plan: Implementation review 2023 (released 26 Feb 2024), Key points; and its terms of reference
  56. S56 Convention on Wetlands, Global Wetland Outlook 2025 (website summary)
  57. S57 UNESCO, "Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat" (depositary page)
  58. S58 South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force (2022), Biennial Report (December 2022)
  59. S59 EvergladesRestoration.gov (US Department of the Interior), "Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)" and "Task Force overview"
  60. S60 US National Park Service, Everglades National Park home page
  61. S61 NASA Earth Observatory, "World of Change: Shrinking Aral Sea"
  62. S62 Rijkswaterstaat, "Ruimte voor de rivieren" (programme page, including Room for the River, the Meuse Works and the podcast quotation on Lent)
  63. S63 Nile Basin Initiative (2024), "Announcement of the Entry into force of the CFA on 13 October 2024"
  64. S64 Blum M.D. and Roberts H.H. (2009), "Drowning of the Mississippi Delta due to insufficient sediment supply and global sea-level rise", Nature Geoscience 2: 488–491
  65. S65 UN Security Council, S/2025/562 (9 Sep 2025): letter from the Permanent Representative of Egypt, annexing a letter from Egypt's Minister for Foreign Affairs on the GERD
  66. S66 United Arab Republic and Sudan, Agreement for the full utilization of the Nile waters (Cairo, 8 Nov 1959), UN Treaty Series vol. 453, No. 6519
  67. S67 Murray–Darling Basin Authority, "Basin Plan"