← IB Geography · SL · HL · IB Geography revision
⭐ 0
IB Diploma Geography SL and HL · Option B: Oceans and coastal margins
Mini-LessonSL and HL

Oceans and coastal margins

14 missions. Guess, learn, then check. Your place is saved.

  1. Mission 1The Gulf Stream carries more water than all the world's rivers combined. Is that why north-west Europe has mild winters?
  2. Mission 2In December 2023 the Panama Canal let through 22 ships a day, against 36 in its "regular scenario". What did a patch of warm Pacific Ocean have to do with it?
  3. Mission 3Hurricane Ian hit Florida with 130-knot winds in 2022. Why was water, not wind, its deadliest hazard?
  4. Mission 4The ocean took up 29% of the CO₂ humans emitted over the last decade. Why is that bad news for coral reefs?
  5. Mission 5Between 1951 and 2004 the cliffs at Aldbrough, on England's Holderness coast, retreated about 2 m a year. Why do they disappear so fast?
  6. Mission 6Spurn Point is over three miles long and in places only 50 m wide. How did a finger of sand form across the mouth of the Humber?
  7. Mission 7On the coast of the Gulf of Bothnia, the land rises out of the sea by about 0.9 m a century. Elsewhere, coasts are drowning. How can both be true?
  8. Mission 8By 2014 the Environment Agency had built new banks inland at Medmerry, West Sussex, and let the sea flood the land between. Why give land to the sea?
  9. Mission 91,282 people and organisations sent formal comments on one plan for the Suffolk coast. Who were they, and who won?
  10. Mission 10A community on Kenya's coast earns money by not cutting down its mangroves. Who pays, and why?
  11. Mission 11The world now farms more fish and shellfish than it catches. Does that solve overfishing?
  12. Mission 12Tankers spilled about 95% less oil in the 2010s than in the 1970s. Why has plastic proved so much harder to stop?
  13. Mission 13Russia, Denmark and Canada have each asked a UN body to recognise their seabed rights in the Arctic Ocean. Who owns the ocean floor?
  14. Mission 14In 2024, ships from Shenzhen to Rotterdam began sailing about 3,000 extra nautical miles around Africa. Why take the long way?
Mission 1

Mission 1: The Gulf Stream carries more water than all the world's rivers combined. Is that why north-west Europe has mild winters?

Make a guess: The Gulf Stream carries more water than all the world's rivers combined. Is that why north-west Europe has mild winters?

Mission 1

Surface currents and gyres

Gyres and major surface currentsAtlantic and Indian OceansGulf StreamNorth Atlantic DriftCanaryBenguelaPacific OceanKuroshioCaliforniaHumboldtwarm currentcold currentother currents in the gyresNorthern Hemisphere gyres turn clockwise; SouthernHemisphere gyres turn anticlockwise. Arrows areschematic.Gyres: NOAA National Ocean Service, What is a gyre?Schematic paths, not measured flows. Map: Natural Earth,Robinson projection.
  • Wind, tides, and differences in temperature and salinity drive ocean currents.
  • Earth's rotation deflects moving air and water to the right in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern: the Coriolis effect.
  • Surface currents form gyres, large rotating systems. There are five major gyres: the North and South Pacific, the North and South Atlantic, and the Indian Ocean subtropical gyres.
Mission 1

Warm and cold currents

  • On the western side of each ocean basin, warm currents carry tropical water towards the poles (the Gulf Stream, the Kuroshio).
  • The Gulf Stream's extension, the North Atlantic Drift, carries warm water on towards north-west Europe.
  • On the eastern side, cold currents flow towards the equator (the Humboldt off Peru, the Canary, the Benguela).
  • Warm currents warm and moisten the air above them; cold currents cool it and often bring fog and aridity to the coast.
Quick check
?Which pair correctly matches a current to its side of the ocean basin?
Mission 1

The global conveyor belt

The global conveyor beltStart: Norwegian SeaWarm surface flow returnsNorwegian Sea: cooling and sea-iceformation make the water denser, soit sinksAround Antarctica: sea-ice formationraises salinity, so water sinksUpwelling in the Indianand PacificDeep flow south, then eastAtlanticIndian and PacificDensity depends on temperature and salinityColder water is denser. Saltier water is denser.Density = f(temperature, salinity)Schematic, not to scale. Source: NOAA National OceanService, What is the global ocean conveyor belt? andThermohaline circulation.
  • Below the surface, the thermohaline circulation is driven by density, which depends on temperature (thermo) and salinity (haline).
  • When sea ice forms, the remaining seawater gets saltier and denser, and starts to sink. Water that loses heat to the atmosphere also becomes denser and sinks.
  • NOAA describes the global ocean conveyor belt as getting its "start" in the Norwegian Sea.
  • The Atlantic part is the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).
Calculate

The RAPID array has measured the AMOC across the Atlantic at 26.5°N since 2004. Over its first year the flow averaged 18.7 Sv and ranged from 4.0 to 34.9 Sv. One sverdrup (Sv) is a flow of one million m³ of water per second.

?Calculate the range of the flow, in Sv.
Mission 1

Nutrient transfers: upwelling

Coastal upwellingWind blowingalong the coastOpen oceanSurface water pushedoffshoreCold, nutrient-richwater risesPlankton and fishnear the surfaceLandSchematic, not to scale. Source: NOAA National OceanService, What is upwelling? The cross symbol shows windblowing into the page, parallel to the shore.
  • Upwelling is a process in which deep, cold water rises towards the surface. Winds blowing along the shore push surface water away.
  • Upwelled water is typically colder and rich in nutrients, so good fishing grounds are found where upwelling is common.
  • Off Peru, upwelling in the Humboldt Current feeds the anchoveta fishery, which in recent years made up to 71% of catches in the South-east Pacific.
Quick check
?Why are coastal upwelling zones such rich fishing grounds?
Mission 1

Energy transfers

  • Currents move heat from the tropics towards the poles. NOAA calls the Gulf Stream "the main conveyor of heat from south to north in the Atlantic".
  • This is an energy transfer: the ocean releases the heat to the air in higher latitudes.
Mission 1

Does the Gulf Stream warm Europe? (AO3)

  • Seager et al. (2002) modelled Europe's mild winters. They found "the principal cause" of the winter contrast with eastern North America "is advection by the mean winds".
  • Ocean heat transport warms winters on both sides of the North Atlantic "by a few degC", in an essentially uniform way, so it does not explain the contrast between them.
  • Exam move: an influential model study is evidence, not proof. Say what it found, and weigh it against other explanations.
Mission 1

A changing conveyor

  • IPCC (2021): the AMOC "is very likely to weaken over the 21st century for all emissions scenarios".
  • It has "medium confidence that there will not be an abrupt collapse before 2100".
  • If a collapse did occur, it would very likely bring abrupt shifts such as weaker African and Asian monsoons and drying in Europe.
  • Synthesis: a change in one part of the ocean system has effects far away.
Mission check

?Is the Gulf Stream why north-west Europe has mild winters?
Mission 2

Mission 2: In December 2023 the Panama Canal let through 22 ships a day, against 36 in its "regular scenario". What did a patch of warm Pacific Ocean have to do with it?

Make a guess: In December 2023 the Panama Canal let through 22 ships a day, against 36 in its "regular scenario". What did a patch of warm Pacific Ocean have to do with it?

Mission 2

Normal conditions in the tropical Pacific

Normal conditions: the Walker CirculationRising air over the Maritime ContinentSinking airTrade winds, east towestPacific WarmPoolCool water,upwellingThermoclineWest180°EastSchematic, not to scale. Source: NOAA Climate.gov, TheWalker Circulation: ENSO’s atmospheric buddy; NOAANational Ocean Service, What are El Niño and La Niña?
  • Trade winds blow west along the equator, taking warm water from South America towards Asia; cold water rises off South America to replace it.
  • Warm water piles up in the west, as the Pacific Warm Pool. Air rises over it and sinks over the cooler east.
  • This loop of rising air in the west and sinking air in the east is the Walker Circulation.
Mission 2

El Niño and La Niña

El Niño and La NiñaEl Niño0 m50 m100 m150 m200 mRain and rising air shift east, beyond 180°Trade windsweak orreversedWarm waterextends eastUpwelling weakensor stops150–175 mWest180°EastLa Niña0 m50 m100 m150 m200 mStronger Walker Circulation, more rain overIndonesiaStronger trade windsMore upwelling andcolder water in the east50–100 mWest180°EastSource: NOAA Climate Prediction Center, ENSOfrequently asked questions (thermocline depths); NOAAClimate.gov. Schematic: horizontal distances are not toscale. The depth scale is the same in both panels; only theshaded 150–175 m and 50–100 m ranges (east-centralequatorial Pacific) are sourced, the rest of the curve isindicative.
  • El Niño: above-average sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern tropical Pacific. The easterly trade winds weaken or even reverse.
  • Rising air and rain shift east with the warm water, beyond 180°: less rain over Indonesia, more over the central Pacific.
  • The thermocline in the east-central Pacific deepens to typically 150–175 m, and upwelling weakens or stops.
  • La Niña: below-average temperatures there, stronger trade winds, more upwelling, a thermocline of typically 50–100 m, and more rain over Indonesia.
Mission 2

A coupled system

  • ENSO is coupled: ocean and atmosphere change together.
  • The atmospheric half is the Southern Oscillation, a see-saw of air pressure between Tahiti and Darwin.
  • A strongly negative Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) goes with El Niño, and a strongly positive one with La Niña.
Mission 2

How often, and how it is measured

  • NOAA's Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) is the rolling 3-month average temperature anomaly in the east-central tropical Pacific. Values of +0.5 or higher indicate El Niño; −0.5 or lower, La Niña.
  • Episodes typically occur every 3–5 years, though the interval has varied from 2 to 7 years. They typically last nine to 12 months.
  • WMO: the 2023–24 El Niño peaked in December 2023 "as one of five strongest on record".
Quick check
?The east-central equatorial Pacific has been 1.4 °C warmer than average for three months, trade winds are weak and the thermocline is unusually deep. Which phase is this?
Mission 2

El Niño 2023–24: the Panama Canal

Impacts of ENSO, 2020 to 20241234Atlantic OceanPacificEl NiñoLa Niña1Panama Canal, El Niño 2023–24: daily transits cutfrom 36 to 22 (Panama Canal Authority).2Southern Africa, El Niño 2024: February 2024 drieston record; 71 million people food insecure (SADC).3Peru, El Niño 2023: anchoveta catches severely hit(FAO).4Horn of Africa, La Niña 2020–23: five consecutivefailed rainy seasons (World Weather Attribution).Sources: Panama Canal Authority (15 Dec 2023); SADC,Regional Humanitarian Appeal Addendum (Nov 2024);FAO, SOFIA 2026; World Weather Attribution (27 Apr2023). Map: Natural Earth. Marker positions areapproximate.
  • The Gatun and Alhajuela lakes store water for the canal's operation and for Panama's population. October 2023 was the driest October on record in the Canal watershed, and 2023 its second-driest year.
  • The Panama Canal Authority cut daily transits to 22, against 36 in what its table calls the "regular scenario", citing "the drought induced by the El Niño phenomenon". It called this "the first time the Canal has ever had to restrict transits".
Mission 2

El Niño 2023–24: southern Africa

  • In large parts of central and southern Africa, February 2024 was the driest on record, with a severe heatwave.
  • Seven countries declared national disasters (SADC's count; six of them for drought alone), including Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe. 71 million people were food insecure, 17.9% of the region's population.
  • SADC: El Niño was "not the sole driver" of food insecurity, but was "the primary driver of the significant increase" in 2024.
Mission 2

El Niño and Peru's fishery

From warm water to empty netsEl NiñoWarmer coastal waterWeaker upwellingFewer nutrientsFewer plankton (phytoplankton)Fewer anchovetaLower catch and fishmeal exportsChain as in NOAA National Ocean Service (What are ElNiño and La Niña?) and FAO, SOFIA 2026 (HumboldtCurrent upwelling disrupted by a coastal El Niño in 2023).
  • In 2023, a coastal El Niño "disrupted the highly productive Humboldt Current upwelling system", and anchoveta catches were severely hit.
  • As the anchoveta recovered, Peru's catches rose from 3.5 million tonnes in 2023 to 5.7 million tonnes in 2024.
  • The chain: warmer water → weaker upwelling → fewer nutrients → fewer plankton → fewer fish.
Calculate
?Using the rounded figures on screen 2.8, calculate the percentage increase in Peru's catch from 2023 to 2024.
Mission 2

La Niña 2020–23: the Horn of Africa

  • The tropical Pacific was in a La Niña state, with short interruptions, from September 2020: WMO called it the first "triple-dip" La Niña of the 21st century.
  • Southern Ethiopia, southern Somalia and eastern Kenya had five consecutive failed rainy seasons from October 2020.
  • Kenya's drought early warning bulletin projected that 4.35 million people in its drought-affected counties would need humanitarian assistance by October 2022 (cited by WWA).
Mission 2

Weighing La Niña and climate change (AO3)

  • Below-average short rains correlate highly with La Niña.
  • World Weather Attribution found that climate change has made such droughts "about 100 times more likely", mainly through higher temperatures raising evaporation.
  • Not all ENSO effects are harmful: El Niño "contributes to more eastern Pacific hurricanes and fewer Atlantic hurricanes", and La Niña's stronger upwelling supports more marine life off the Americas.
  • Exam move: name the phase, place and date, and weigh ENSO against other drivers such as warming and vulnerability.
Mission check

?What did a patch of warm Pacific Ocean have to do with the Panama Canal's restrictions?
Mission 3

Mission 3: Hurricane Ian hit Florida with 130-knot winds in 2022. Why was water, not wind, its deadliest hazard?

Make a guess: Hurricane Ian hit Florida with 130-knot winds in 2022. Why was water, not wind, its deadliest hazard?

Mission 3

What a tropical cyclone is

Anatomy of a hurricaneCross-section of a hurricaneWarm ocean water belowEye: calm, sinkingairOutflow at thetopEyewall:toweringthunderstormsSpiral rainbandsInflow at thesurfaceSaffir–Simpson scale: maximum sustained windCategoryKnots (kt)Miles per hour164–8274–95283–9596–1103 (major)96–112111–1294 (major)113–136130–1565 (major)137 or more157 or moreThe scale measures wind only: it does not take stormsurge, rainfall flooding or tornadoes into account.Schematic, not to scale. Source: NOAA National HurricaneCenter, Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale; WMO,Tropical cyclone topic page.
  • A rapidly rotating storm that begins over tropical oceans; called a hurricane or typhoon, depending on the region.
  • Structure: a calm eye, a ring of towering thunderstorms in the eyewall, and spiral rain bands.
  • The Saffir–Simpson scale rates hurricanes 1 to 5 by maximum sustained wind: category 4 is 113–136 kt and category 5 is 137 kt or more. Categories 3–5 are major hurricanes.
  • The scale "does not take into account" storm surge, rainfall flooding or tornadoes.
Mission 3

How they form

  • Warm ocean water (about 80 °F, or 27 °C) at the surface, warm to a depth of about 150 ft (about 45 m).
  • An atmosphere that cools quickly with height, with moist air in the middle troposphere.
  • Enough spin from the Coriolis force, so at least 300 miles (about 480 km) from the equator, and low vertical wind shear.
  • A pre-existing disturbance to start from: in the Atlantic, about 85% of intense hurricanes begin as African Easterly Waves. Many disturbances with favourable conditions still do not develop.
Quick check
?Why do tropical cyclones almost never form on the equator, even where the sea is warm?
Mission 3

Where and when

Where tropical cyclones formAtlantic and Indian OceansHurricanesCyclonesCyclonesSouthAtlantic:rarePacific OceanTyphoonsHurricanesCyclonesCyclonesShaded band: 25°N to 25°S. Dotted line: the equator.Red arrows: typical tracks (schematic).Main seasons: July–October in the NorthernHemisphere, December–March in the Southern, withdifferences from basin to basin.The North-west Pacific has cyclones all year round.Globally, September is the most active month.None form on the equator: a storm must be at least 300miles (about 480 km) from it.Source: NOAA AOML Hurricane Research Division,Hurricane FAQ; WMO, Tropical cyclone topic page. Map:Natural Earth. Tracks are schematic, not measured paths.
  • Tropical cyclones form over tropical waters, between 25°S and 25°N.
  • Main seasons, "though there are differences from basin to basin": July–October in the Northern Hemisphere and December–March in the Southern. Globally, September is the most active month.
  • The North-west Pacific has cyclones all year round. Cool water, as off the US west coast, quickly weakens storms.
  • WMO counts, over "the past 50 years", 1,945 disasters attributed to tropical cyclones, with 779,324 deaths and US$1.4 trillion in losses.
Mission 3

Storm surge

Storm surgeWide, gently sloping shelf: higher surgeStrong onshore windNormal high tide (predicted)Storm tide (tide + surge)surgeWaves on top of the surgeNarrow, steep shelf: lower surgeStrong onshore windNormal high tide (predicted)Storm tide (tide + surge)surgeWaves on top of the surgeSchematic, not to scale; the surge heights are relativeonly. Source: NOAA National Hurricane Center, Stormsurge overview. Storm surge: an abnormal rise of watergenerated by a storm, over and above the predictedastronomical tide.
  • Storm surge: an abnormal rise of water generated by a storm, over and above the predicted astronomical tide. Storm surge plus tide gives the storm tide.
  • It is caused mainly by strong onshore winds; in shallow water near the coast the water can only move up and inland.
  • Surge is higher on a wide, gently sloping continental shelf, and on a concave coastline.
Mission 3

Case study: Hurricane Ian, 2022

Hurricane Ian's track, 23 to 30 September 202223 Sep24 Sep25 Sep26 Sep27 Sep28 Sep29 Sep30 SepABCDGulf of MexicoCuba500 kmTrack colour: blue, below hurricane strength (under 64 kt);orange, category 1–3 (64–112 kt); red, category 4–5 (113kt or more). Dots: 0000 UTC. North is up.ALa Coloma, Cuba: 27 Sept, 110 kt (category 3).BCayo Costa, Florida: 28 Sept, 130 kt (category 4).CPeak intensity: 140 kt (category 5), 28 Sept.DSouth Carolina: 30 Sept, 70 kt (category 1).Source: NHC Tropical Cyclone Report, Hurricane Ian(AL092022), Table 1, best track (times UTC). Landfalltimes: La Coloma 0830 UTC 27 Sept; Cayo Costa 1905UTC 28 Sept; South Carolina (near Georgetown) 1805UTC 30 Sept. Map: Natural Earth.
  • Ian intensified rapidly over waters of 30 °C and higher, with low wind shear.
  • 27 September: landfall near La Coloma, Pinar del Río, Cuba, as a 110-kt category 3 hurricane.
  • 28 September: peak of 140 kt (category 5), then landfall on Cayo Costa, Florida, at 130 kt (category 4).
  • The NHC links the devastation to the exact track, strong winds and "large storm size".
Mission 3

Ian: impacts on coastal places

  • Peak surge inundation was 10–15 ft (3–4.6 m) above ground at Fort Myers Beach. Portions of the Sanibel Causeway were washed away.
  • Lee County: at least 52,514 structures impacted, 5,369 of them destroyed.
  • On Florida's east coast, aerial imagery showed "extensive beach erosion and damage to piers" from large breaking waves.
Mission 3

Ian: deaths and damage

Hurricane Ian: direct deaths in the US, by hazardHurricane Ian: direct deaths, USStorm surge41Freshwaterflooding12Marine8Wind4Rough surf1010203040Direct deathsSource: NHC Tropical Cyclone Report, Hurricane Ian(AL092022), revised 12 March 2026. Direct deaths only;deaths caused indirectly are not shown.
  • In the US, at least 156 deaths, 66 of them directly caused by the storm. Storm surge killed 41, freshwater flooding 12 and wind 4.
  • US damage: an estimated $112.9 billion (90% confidence interval $86.8–135.9 billion).
  • Cuba: 5 deaths reported (3 directly caused by Ian); more than 100,000 homes damaged or destroyed; the whole island reportedly lost power for a few days.
Calculate
?Using screen 3.8, calculate the percentage of Ian's direct deaths in the United States that were caused by storm surge.
Mission 3

Warnings and forecasts

  • The storm surge watch and warning for Fort Myers Beach were issued 48 and 30 hours before tropical-storm-force winds arrived.
  • The peak surge forecast there rose from 4–7 ft to 8–12 ft on 27 September, and to a final 12–18 ft. NHC's later analysis found 10–15 ft above ground.
  • Intensity forecast errors were above average, largely because of the rapid intensification.
Mission 3

Recovery and evaluation (AO3)

  • By September 2024, federal support topped $10.2 billion, including $1.15 billion for 387,139 households and $4.67 billion of flood-insurance claims paid to about 47,000 policyholders.
  • The data are unequal too: the NHC gives no monetary damage estimate for Cuba, so losses in the two countries cannot be compared in dollars.
  • Exam move: compare impacts and responses at different scales and levels of development, and say where data are missing.
Mission check

?Why was water, not wind, Ian's deadliest hazard in Florida?
Mission 4

Mission 4: The ocean took up 29% of the CO₂ humans emitted over the last decade. Why is that bad news for coral reefs?

Make a guess: The ocean took up 29% of the CO₂ humans emitted over the last decade. Why is that bad news for coral reefs?

Mission 4

The ocean as a carbon store

  • The ocean holds about 50 times as much carbon as the atmosphere.
  • Carbon moves quickly between surface water and the air, but may be stored for centuries in the deep ocean.
  • A store holds carbon; a sink takes up more than it releases; a source releases more than it takes up.
Mission 4

The solubility pump

Solubility and biological pumpsAtmosphere: CO₂Seafloor sedimentsSolubility pumpCO₂ is more than twiceas soluble in coldpolar water as inwarm equatorial waterThe cold water isdenser, so it sinks,taking the carbon todepthBiological pumpPhytoplankton turnCO₂ into organic matterOrganic matter sinks:about 30% reachesdeeper waterOnly about 0.1%reaches the sedimentsSchematic, not to scale. Source: Feely et al. (2001), Uptakeand storage of carbon dioxide in the ocean, Oceanography14(4), NOAA PMEL.
  • CO₂ is more than twice as soluble in cold polar water as in warm equatorial water.
  • Water cooled on its way poleward absorbs CO₂, becomes denser and sinks, taking the carbon to depth.
Mission 4

The biological pump

  • Phytoplankton turn CO₂ into organic matter. Perhaps 30% of it sinks into deeper water, and only about 0.1% reaches the seafloor sediments.
  • A 1995 model study (Sarmiento et al.), reported by Feely et al., estimated that the natural solubility pump causes about 20% of the vertical gradient in dissolved inorganic carbon, and the biological pump about 80%.
Quick check
?Why do the cold North Atlantic and Southern Ocean take up so much CO₂?
Mission 4

Sink and source

Where our CO2 goes, 2015-2024Where our CO₂ goes, 2015–2024Atmosphere 50%Ocean 29%Land 21%Total CO₂ emissions50%29%21%0255075100% of total CO₂ emissionsBudget imbalance not shown.Source: Friedlingstein et al. (2026), Global Carbon Budget2025, Earth System Science Data 18. Ocean sink 3.2 ± 0.4GtC a year. The shares are rounded.
  • 2015–2024: the ocean took up 3.2 ± 0.4 billion tonnes of carbon (GtC) a year, 29% of total CO₂ emissions; the land took up 21% and the atmosphere kept 50%.
  • Natural CO₂ is released mostly in the tropics, especially where deep water upwells along the equator.
  • During large El Niño events, less CO₂ escapes from the tropical Pacific, so the sink is stronger; it is weaker during La Niña. Synthesis with Mission 2.
Mission 4

A changing role

  • The ocean sink has been "stagnant since 2016", partly because of climate variability and the ocean heatwave of 2023–24.
  • Warmer water dissolves less CO₂ (screen 4.2), so warming works against the solubility pump.
  • Models estimate that climate change cut the sink by 0.20 GtC a year in 2015–2024: 7.1% less than in a model run with rising CO₂ but no climate change.
  • IPCC: the proportion of emissions taken up by land and ocean decreases as cumulative emissions rise.
Mission 4

Ocean acidification

Acidification chemistryCO₂ + H₂OCO₂ dissolves in seawaterCarbonic acid (H₂CO₃)H⁺ + HCO₃⁻hydrogen ions and bicarbonate. Ocean average pHnow around 8.1H⁺ + CO₃²⁻ → HCO₃⁻extra hydrogen ions bond with carbonate ionsFewer carbonate ionsHarder to build calcium carbonate skeletonscalcification by corals and shellfish is harderReactions as in NOAA Education, Ocean acidificationresource collection.
  • CO₂ dissolves in seawater to form carbonic acid, which releases hydrogen ions and bicarbonate. The ocean's average pH is now around 8.1.
  • Extra hydrogen ions bond with carbonate ions, leaving fewer for corals and shellfish to build calcium carbonate skeletons. If pH falls far enough, shells and skeletons can begin to dissolve.
  • IPCC: it is "virtually certain" that human CO₂ emissions are the main driver of current ocean acidification.
Calculate

Over the industrial era, the pH of surface ocean water has fallen by 0.1 units. The pH scale is logarithmic: each fall of 1 unit means 10 times as many hydrogen ions.

?By what percentage does the hydrogen-ion concentration rise when pH falls by 0.1?
Mission 4

Coral reefs under two pressures

  • Bleaching is caused by heat stress. From early 2023 to mid-2025, bleaching-level heat stress hit 84% of the world's coral reef area; mass bleaching was documented in at least 83 countries and territories.
  • Acidification slows calcification and so reef growth. IPCC: acidification is projected to "amplify the adverse effects of warming".
  • Coral reefs are projected to decline by a further 70–90% at 1.5 °C of warming, and by more than 99% at 2 °C.
Mission 4

The Great Barrier Reef: recent data

Great Barrier Reef hard coral cover, 2024 to 2026Hard coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef (%)202420252026Northern GBR39.830.035.1Central GBR33.228.631.6SouthernGBR38.926.926.4010203040Hard coral cover (%) in each survey yearSource: AIMS, Annual summary report of coral reefcondition 2024/25 (6 Aug 2025) and 2025/26 (11 Aug2026). Survey years 2024, 2025 and 2026.
  • Hard coral cover, northern GBR: 39.8% (2024) → 30.0% (2025), the largest annual decline recorded for the northern region since monitoring began. Southern GBR: 38.9% → 26.9%.
  • AIMS: "the mass coral bleaching event was the primary source of coral mortality".
  • 2026: northern cover recovered to 35.1%, helped by late-summer monsoon cloud and cooler water; southern cover was 26.4%.
  • Exam move: separate heat (bleaching) from chemistry (acidification) when you explain reef decline.
Mission check

?Why is the ocean's uptake of CO₂ bad news for coral reefs?
Mission 5

Mission 5: Between 1951 and 2004 the cliffs at Aldbrough, on England's Holderness coast, retreated about 2 m a year. Why do they disappear so fast?

Make a guess: Between 1951 and 2004 the cliffs at Aldbrough, on England's Holderness coast, retreated about 2 m a year. Why do they disappear so fast?

Mission 5

The coast as a system

The coast as a systemInputsEnergy:waves, tides,windSediment:from rivers,cliffs and theseabedProcessesErosionTransportDepositionSubaerial:weatheringand massmovement onthe cliffOutputsLandformsSedimentcarried alongor offshoreSediment cell boundary (dashed): sediment mostlycirculates within the cellGeneric model; no figures. Terms as in the IB Geographyguide, Option B.
  • Inputs: energy from waves, tides and wind; sediment from rivers, cliffs and the seabed.
  • Processes: erosion, transport, deposition and subaerial processes (weathering and mass movement on the cliff above the sea).
  • Outputs: landforms, and sediment carried along or offshore.
  • Coasts are divided into sediment cells: stretches within which sediment mostly circulates.
Mission 5

Waves

Constructive and destructive wavesDestructive waveHigh, steep waveWeak swashStrong backwash removesmaterialBeach is loweredConstructive waveLow waveStrong swash buildsthe beachWeak backwashBerm builtSchematic, not to scale. Arrow thickness shows relativestrength. Terms as in the IB Geography guide, Option B.
  • Waves are made by wind. Their energy grows with wind speed, wind duration and fetch (the distance of open water the wind blows over).
  • Destructive waves: high and steep, with a backwash stronger than the swash, so they remove material.
  • Constructive waves: low, with a strong swash, so they build beaches.
Mission 5

Tides

  • Tides: the rise and fall of sea level caused by the Moon and Sun. Britain has some of the largest tides in the world, with a range of up to 15 m.
  • The tidal range decides where waves attack: a small range concentrates wave attack at one level of the cliff; a large range spreads it.
Mission 5

Erosion and transport

Littoral driftPrevailing wind andwaves arrive at anangleSeaGroyne trapssand on itsupdrift sideSwash: carries sedimentup the beach at an angleBackwash: straight backdown the beach, at rightangles to the shorelineNet drift: sediment zig-zags alongthe beachLandSchematic plan view, not to scale. Terms as in the IBGeography guide, Option B.
  • Hydraulic action: the force of water, and air compressed into cracks, breaks rock apart.
  • Abrasion: waves throw sand and pebbles against the cliff, wearing it away.
  • Littoral (longshore) drift: waves arrive at an angle, so the swash moves sediment up the beach at that angle and the backwash drags it straight down; sediment zig-zags along the coast.
  • Currents deposit the sediment where they slow down. A beach that loses its sand is left more exposed to waves.
Quick check
?Which wave is likely to carry the most energy to a cliff?
Mission 5

Lithology: weak till and hard chalk

The Holderness coastFlamborough HeadBridlingtonHornseaAldbroughWithernseaSpurn HeadChalkGlacialtillNorth SeaHumber estuary10 kmRed arrow: southward drift of sediment. Geology isschematic: chalk in the north-west (Flamborough Head),till on Holderness. North is up.Geology: British Geological Survey (Aldbrough landslidecase study; Six changing coastlines). Place positions andthe geology boundary are approximate. Map: NaturalEarth.
  • Holderness cliffs are glacial till (boulder clay), mostly late Devensian (18,000–13,000 years old): the Skipsea Till and the overlying Withernsea Till.
  • At Aldbrough the cliffs are about 20 m high. At high tide, waves erode their lower and sometimes middle sections.
  • At Flamborough Head, to the north, the cliffs are chalk, capped by till. The chalk "is more resistant to erosion than the overlying till".
Mission 5

Subaerial processes and mass movement

  • Above the waves, the till cliffs fail by rotational slumping, with smaller topples and falls, and short-lived mudflows.
  • Increased rainfall could make the till more likely to fail.
  • Waves remove the slumped material from the cliff foot, so the cycle repeats.
Quick check
?Which factor best explains why Holderness retreats so much faster than Flamborough Head?
Calculate
?BGS reports a retreat rate at Aldbrough (measured at the caravan site) of 2.16 m a year between 1951 and 2004. Calculate the total retreat over that period, to the nearest metre.
Mission 5

Sediment supply (synthesis)

  • Holderness's erosion is also a sediment supply: estimates going back to 1786 put the loss from the cliffs at up to 2 million m³ a year.
  • Spurn Point, to the south, formed from "deposits moving along the coast" (Mission 6).
  • Exam move: one stretch of coast's loss is another's supply. Link erosion, transport and deposition.
Mission 5

Vegetation

  • Vegetation traps and binds sediment: marram on dunes (Mission 6), and saltmarsh, which damps wave action and acts as a natural defence.
  • Roots also bind cliff-top soil, but cannot stop slumping where the sea removes the cliff foot.
Mission check

?Why do Aldbrough's cliffs disappear so fast?
Mission 6

Mission 6: Spurn Point is over three miles long and in places only 50 m wide. How did a finger of sand form across the mouth of the Humber?

Make a guess: Spurn Point is over three miles long and in places only 50 m wide. How did a finger of sand form across the mouth of the Humber?

Mission 6

Cliffs and wave-cut platforms

Cliff retreat and the wave-cut platformWaves cut a notchHigh tideLow tideHydraulic action andabrasionThe overhang collapsesHigh tideLow tideThe cliff retreats and the platform widensEarlier clifflinesHigh tideLow tidePlatform exposedat low tideWaves lose energy beforereaching the cliff: negativefeedbackSchematic, not to scale. Terms as in the IB Geographyguide, Option B.
  • Waves erode a wave-cut notch at the base of a cliff by hydraulic action and abrasion.
  • The overhang collapses, and the cliff retreats inland, leaving a gently sloping wave-cut platform, exposed at low tide.
  • As the platform widens, waves break further out and lose energy before reaching the cliff, so retreat slows: negative feedback.
Mission 6

Headlands: cave, arch, stack, stump

Cave, arch, stack, stumpCrackCaveArchStackStumpChalk headland, from the cliff out to seaWaves exploit lines of weakness: joints and faultsSchematic, not to scale. Sequence as in the IB Geographyguide, Option B. Chalk headland, as at Flamborough Headand Old Harry Rocks.
  • Waves exploit lines of weakness (joints and faults) in a headland: crack → cave → arch → stack → stump.
  • At Flamborough Head, BGS warns that more wave activity could attack the chalk at wave level, "creating undercutting and cavities".
  • Old Harry Rocks, Dorset: "towering sea stacks and cliffs topped by chalk downland".
Quick check
?Which sequence is correct for the erosion of a headland?
Mission 6

Beaches and spits

How Spurn formedWithernseaSpurn1 km washoversectionSaltmarsh behindthe spitEroding tillcliffsSediment driftHumberestuaryNorth Sea5 kmRed arrow: sediment drifting south. Over three miles long,in places only 50 m wide. Washover and saltmarshpositions are schematic. North is up.Source: Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, Spurn National NatureReserve (over three miles long, as little as 50 m wide; a 1km washover section); BGS. Map: Natural Earth (the spit isdrawn wider than it is).
  • Beaches form where deposition exceeds removal: sand on gentle slopes, shingle on steeper ones.
  • A spit forms where littoral drift carries sediment past a change in the direction of the coast; it grows out from the land, often with a recurved (hooked) end and saltmarsh behind it.
  • Spurn formed "as a long, narrow spit from deposits moving along the coast carried by currents". It is over three miles long, but in places only 50 m wide.
Mission 6

Spurn: a changing landform

  • Storms have breached Spurn many times. In December 2013 a tidal surge burst through its narrowest part and destroyed the road.
  • A 1 km "washover" section is sometimes covered at high tide, cutting the end off from the mainland.
  • BGS reports that sea-level rise "is predicted to completely cut off Spurn Head by 2050", according to modelled UKCP18 scenarios.
Mission 6

How sand dunes start

  • Onshore winds blow dry sand inland from a wide beach; it collects behind obstacles such as the strandline.
  • Embryonic dunes are the first, low dunes at the top of a beach, where pioneer plants such as sand couch and lyme-grass trap blowing sand. They are either replaced by marram-dominated dunes or washed away by storms.
  • Dunes depend on a continued supply of sand from the beach.
Mission 6

Dune succession

PsammosereWater tableOnshore windMore organic matter, olderdunes123451Strandline2Embryonic dunes: sand couch and lyme-grass trapblowing sand3White (yellow) dunes: marram dominates4Grey (fixed) dunes: grassland replaces marram asthe sand gains organic matter5Dune slack: low, seasonally flooded hollow withfew nutrientsSchematic, not to scale. Stages and plants as in NaturalEngland, Sand dune vegetation (Studland Dunes). Apsammosere is a plant succession on sand.
  • White (shifting) dunes, also called yellow dunes: sand-binding marram (Ammophila arenaria) usually dominates. The vegetation "will rapidly change and disappear if stability is imposed".
  • Grey (fixed) dunes: grassland replaces marram as the dune stabilises and the sand gains organic matter.
  • Dune slacks: low, seasonally flooded hollows with few nutrients.
  • Succession on sand is a psammosere: each stage changes conditions for the next.
Quick check
?What role does marram grass play in dune development?
Mission 6

Studland and Sefton: dunes that move

  • At Studland Dunes, Dorset, embryonic dunes "initiate the very clear successional sequence of dune communities".
  • In the 2014 winter storms, Studland lost up to 10 m of dunes in a single storm. The National Trust is now focusing on adaptation and softer defences.
  • The Sefton Coast, Merseyside, "displays both rapid erosion and active progradation": some parts retreat while others build seaward.
Mission check

?How did Spurn form across the mouth of the Humber?
Mission 7

Mission 7: On the coast of the Gulf of Bothnia, the land rises out of the sea by about 0.9 m a century. Elsewhere, coasts are drowning. How can both be true?

Make a guess: On the coast of the Gulf of Bothnia, the land rises out of the sea by about 0.9 m a century. Elsewhere, coasts are drowning. How can both be true?

Mission 7

Eustatic change: the sea moves

Global sea-level rise and its causesAverage rate of global sea-level rise (mm ayear)012341.31901–711.91971–20063.72006–18What drove the rise, 1971–2018Thermal expansion 50%Glaciers 22%Ice sheets 20%Changes in water stored onland 8%Source: IPCC (2021), AR6 Working Group I, Summary forPolicymakers (A.1.7, A.4.3). Global mean sea level rose0.20 m between 1901 and 2018.
  • Eustatic change is a worldwide change in sea level, as the volume of ocean water changes.
  • Global mean sea level rose by 0.20 m between 1901 and 2018. The rate rose from 1.3 mm a year (1901–71) to 1.9 (1971–2006) and 3.7 (2006–18).
  • Thermal expansion explained 50% of the rise in 1971–2018; glaciers 22%, ice sheets 20% and changes in water stored on land 8%.
Mission 7

Isostatic change: the land moves

Isostatic depression and reboundWhile the ice is presentIce sheetweightMantle flows awayCrust pressed downAfter the ice meltsSea levelOld shorelines, nowabove the seaLand risesMantle flows backIce has meltedHigh Coast/Kvarken: about 0.9 m a century todaySchematic, not to scale. Uplift rate: UNESCO WorldHeritage, High Coast / Kvarken Archipelago (S39).
  • Isostatic change is a vertical movement of the land. The weight of an ice sheet presses the crust down; when the ice melts, the land slowly rises.
  • On the High Coast (Sweden) and the Kvarken Archipelago (Finland), about 290 m of uplift has been recorded over the past 10,500 years.
  • The land is still rising, by around 0.9 m a century, and new islands keep emerging. At today's rate, 10,500 years would give only about 95 m, so uplift was far faster at first.
Quick check
?Which is an example of isostatic change?
Calculate

Land on the Gulf of Bothnia rises by about 0.9 m a century. Global sea level rose by about 3.7 mm a year in 2006–2018.

?Assuming the coast there had the global rate, by how many millimetres a year does sea level fall relative to the land?
Mission 7

Landforms of a falling relative sea level

Raised beach and relict cliffPresentbeach andcliffRaised beach: rounded pebbles andshells, now above the reach of theseaRelict cliff: vegetated, no longerreached by wavesSchematic, not to scale. Terms as in the IB Geographyguide, Option B; UNESCO World Heritage, High Coast /Kvarken Archipelago.
  • Raised beach: an old beach, with rounded pebbles and shells, now above the reach of the sea.
  • Relict cliff: a former sea cliff behind a raised beach, no longer attacked by waves and weathering into a gentler slope.
  • UNESCO's High Coast site includes "the full zonation of uplifted land and some of the highest shoreline": old shorelines now far inland and above the sea.
Mission 7

Fjords: valleys drowned by the sea

Fjord long profileLong profile, from the glacier head to the seaGlacierDeep rock basin, farbelow sea levelBasin floor is deeperthan the thresholdShallower rockthreshold near themouthOpen seaU-shaped cross-section of the troughWalls rise up to 1,400 mabove sea levelextend 500 mbelow sea levelSchematic. Vertical proportions in the cross-section followthe 1,400 m and 500 m figures; widths are not to scale.Source: UNESCO World Heritage, West Norwegian Fjords(S40).
  • A fjord forms by "submergence of a glaciated valley": a glacier carves a deep U-shaped trough, and the sea floods it when the ice melts.
  • In the West Norwegian Fjords, walls rise up to 1,400 m from the sea and extend 500 m below sea level.
  • Features include deep rock basins far below sea level and a shallower rock threshold near the mouth.
Quick check
?Why is a fjord deepest inland and shallower at its mouth?
Mission 7

Advancing and retreating: future change (AO3)

  • Relative sea-level change is sea-level change measured against the land: the eustatic change, minus any uplift of the land or plus any sinking (isostatic change).
  • Coasts advance where the land rises faster than the sea, or where deposition builds out (Sefton); they retreat where the sea gains, or erosion wins (Holderness).
  • IPCC likely global rise by 2100, relative to 1995–2014: 0.28–0.55 m under very low emissions and 0.63–1.01 m under very high emissions.
  • Exam move: name the scale (global sea against local land) and the timescale (decades against millennia).
Mission check

?How can the Gulf of Bothnia coast rise out of the sea while other coasts drown?
Mission 8

Mission 8: By 2014 the Environment Agency had built new banks inland at Medmerry, West Sussex, and let the sea flood the land between. Why give land to the sea?

Make a guess: By 2014 the Environment Agency had built new banks inland at Medmerry, West Sussex, and let the sea flood the land between. Why give land to the sea?

Mission 8

The options

Shoreline management optionsHold the lineMaintain or raise theexisting defences.Advance the lineBuild new defencesseaward.Managed realignment(managed retreat)Let the sea in behind anew, landward line ofdefence.No active interventionStop maintaining defencesand let nature take itscourse.Schematic, not to scale. Definitions as in the EnvironmentAgency, Medmerry managed realignment scheme (S41).
  • Hold the line: maintain or raise the existing defences.
  • Advance the line: build new defences seaward.
  • Managed realignment (managed retreat): let the sea in behind a new, landward line of defence.
  • No active intervention: stop maintaining defences and let nature take its course.
  • England's coast is covered by Shoreline Management Plans, which set one of these policies for each stretch.
Mission 8

Hard and soft engineering

  • Hard: sea walls, rock armour, and groynes, which trap littoral drift but can starve beaches further along the coast.
  • Soft: beach nourishment, dune management and managed realignment, which work with natural processes.
  • Exam move: weigh cost, lifespan, effects downdrift and effects on habitats, not just "does it work?".
Mission 8

Cliff line stabilisation: Ventnor

  • Methods: drain water out of the cliff, regrade it to a gentler angle, and protect its toe from waves with a sea wall or rock armour.
  • Ventnor, Isle of Wight, "sits at the bottom of the largest urbanised landslide complex in north-west Europe".
  • Without the sea wall, erosion "would create instability to the landslide complex". In 2023 the Environment Agency began ground investigations to inform the repair and replacement of the defences, which would better protect about 3,000 homes and businesses.
Quick check
?Which measure stabilises a cliff rather than defending a beach?
Mission 8

Medmerry: the problem

Medmerry and SelseySelseyChichesterHarbourPaghamHarbourEnglish ChannelMedmerry1234N1New inland embankments: 7 km (4 miles),completed in 20142Flooded intertidal area, where the sea now enters3Former shingle bank: breached many times in theprevious 15 years4B2145, the only road to SelseySchematic: positions and shapes are approximate, notbuilt from Ordnance Survey data. Source: EnvironmentAgency, Medmerry managed realignment scheme (S41,S42).
  • Medmerry lies west of Selsey, West Sussex. A shingle bank there protected 300 properties, large caravan sites and 650 hectares of land.
  • Storms had breached the bank many times in the previous 15 years, and it needed extensive maintenance every winter.
  • The B2145, the only road to Selsey, and essential utility services for the wider peninsula depended on the protection of this low-lying land.
Mission 8

The decision-making process

  • The Environment Agency, with Chichester and Arun District Councils, completed a technical review in 2005, then consulted local communities in 2007.
  • Options were judged over 100 years on flood and erosion risk, sea-level rise, cost and effects on the natural environment.
  • The government had obligations to create new intertidal habitat to compensate for losses in protected (Natura 2000) sites elsewhere, and studies had identified Medmerry as a prime site.
Mission 8

Options and costs (2007 estimates)

Medmerry: option costs (2007 present value) and the reported cost of the scheme2007 estimates: present-value cost of eachoptionNo active intervention£8–10 millionManaged realignment£10 millionHold the line£80 million020406080Present value, £ million (2007 consultation)Source: Environment Agency et al., Pagham to East Headcoastal defence strategy 2007: initial consultation.Present-value costs for Medmerry. The hatched part of thefirst bar is its range, £8 to £10 million.Reported cost of the completed schemeMedmerry scheme, completed 2014£28 million020406080£ million (EA, 2021)Source: Environment Agency news story, 10 November2021. Reported cost of the scheme, not a present-valueestimate.
  • Present-value costs for Medmerry: no active intervention £8–10 million; hold the line £80 million; managed realignment £10 million.
  • No active intervention cost about the same as realignment, but without winter repairs the bank was likely to breach within a year, and about 50 properties, sewage pumping stations and electricity sub-stations would flood.
  • Holding the line was judged "not practical". Inland banks "will not need to be as large", but "a relatively large area of land" would flood.
Mission 8

Perspectives and outcome (AO3)

  • Environment Agency: lower long-term risk and cost. Government: the wetland helps meet its habitat duty. RSPB: supported delivery.
  • Selsey residents: road and key infrastructure protected. Farmland: "a relatively large area of land" floods.
  • Completed in 2014, with 7 km of new embankments: at the time, the £28 million project was "the largest open-coast scheme in Europe".
  • Evaluate: the £28 million reported for the completed scheme is not comparable with the £10 million present-value estimate of 2007.
Mission check

?Why did the Environment Agency give land to the sea at Medmerry?
Mission 9

Mission 9: 1,282 people and organisations sent formal comments on one plan for the Suffolk coast. Who were they, and who won?

Make a guess: 1,282 people and organisations sent formal comments on one plan for the Suffolk coast. Who were they, and who won?

Mission 9

Coastal land-use pressures

Sizewell C and its neighbours123456NorthSeaAONB: the coaststrip east of thedashed lineN1Dunwich2Minsmere RSPB reserve, part of theMinsmere–Walberswick Special Protection Areaand Ramsar site3Sizewell C site (proposed), next to Sizewell B4Sizewell A and Sizewell B power stations5Sizewell Marshes SSSI6LeistonSchematic: positions are approximate and not built frommapping. Designations as named in the PlanningInspectorate / Secretary of State decision on Sizewell C(S45).
  • Coasts attract commercial uses: tourism, industry and energy, ports, and housing.
  • Conservation measures protect habitats and landscapes through designations (in the UK: SSSIs, Special Protection Areas, Ramsar sites, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty).
  • Conflict arises when one stretch of coast is wanted for several uses at once.
Mission 9

Case study: Sizewell C, Suffolk

  • A proposed nuclear power station of two reactors, about 1,670 MW each, about 3,340 MW in total.
  • It includes an accommodation campus, sports facilities in Leiston, and compensation land for fen meadow and marsh harriers.
  • Next to it: RSPB Minsmere, part of the Minsmere–Walberswick Special Protection Area and Ramsar site, and the Sizewell Marshes SSSI.
Mission 9

The process and the actors

  • Application accepted June 2020; examined April–October 2021 by an Examining Authority (ExA) of planning inspectors; report to the Secretary of State in February 2022.
  • 1,282 relevant representations were received.
  • Actors included the developer, East Suffolk Council, Natural England, the RSPB and Suffolk Wildlife Trust, the National Trust, the water company, local action groups and residents.
Mission 9

Conservation, tourism and housing

  • Conservation: harm to the Minsmere SSSI is "likely" (ExA), and the project takes land permanently from the Sizewell Marshes SSSI.
  • Recreation: the developer agreed there would be significant adverse effects on the recreational benefits of the AONB, Minsmere and Dunwich.
  • Tourism: effects likely negative during construction, neutral once operating; a Tourism Fund is the mitigation.
  • Housing: a 2,400-bed accommodation campus and a 600-berth caravan site for workers, plus a Housing Fund.
Mission 9

The coast itself

The Sizewell C sea defenceSeaAdaptive crest: up to16.4 m AODHard defence crest:12.6 m AOD5 m sacrificial dune(SCDF), recharged asit erodesPowerstationHard coastaldefence featureSchematic, not to scale horizontally or vertically; only thelabelled heights are sourced. Heights above OrdnanceDatum (AOD) as in the Sizewell C decision letter (S45).
  • A hard coastal defence feature would reach 12.6 m above datum, adaptable to 16.4 m, fronted by a 5 m "sacrificial" sand dune that is recharged as it erodes.
  • Without mitigation, the shore would erode enough to expose the hard defence by 2053–2087.
  • The ExA found a breach of the Shoreline Management Plan's "hold the line" policy (MIN 13.1), but judged the defence was "as landward as possible".
Quick check
?The Tourism Fund and Housing Fund are best described as:
Mission 9

The decision

  • The ExA recommended that "unless the outstanding water supply strategy can be resolved and sufficient information provided to enable the Secretary of State carry out his obligations under the Habitats Regulations, the case for an Order granting development consent for the application is not made out".
  • On 20 July 2022 the Secretary of State granted consent, concluding that "the very substantial and urgent need for the proposal outweighs the harms".
  • A temporary desalination plant was added to the water supply plan. The government took its final investment decision on 22 July 2025.
Mission 9

Outcomes for stakeholders (AO3)

Who gained, who lost, who was compensated?Developer and governmentInterest: build a nuclear power station of tworeactors, about 3,340 MW in total.+ Gain: consent granted on 20 July 2022: "the verysubstantial and urgent need for the proposaloutweighs the harms".Councils and local businessesInterest: the local economy.+ Gain: "substantial economic opportunities",acknowledged by the councils.Conservation bodies: Natural England, RSPB,Suffolk Wildlife TrustInterest: Minsmere (a Special Protection Area andRamsar site) and the Sizewell Marshes SSSI nextdoor.Concern: harm to the Minsmere SSSI is "likely"(Examining Authority); land taken permanently fromthe Sizewell Marshes SSSI.− Loss: habitat and disturbance.Mitigated: compensation land for fen meadow andmarsh harriers.Tourism businessesConcern: effects likely negative during construction,neutral once operating.− Loss: tourism during construction.Mitigated, not removed: a Tourism Fund.Residents and visitorsConcern: the developer agreed there would besignificant adverse effects on the recreationalbenefits of the AONB, Minsmere and Dunwich.− Loss: recreation and tranquillity in the AONB.Workers and housingInterest: housing for the construction workforce.Mitigated, not removed: a 2,400-bedaccommodation campus, a 600-berth caravan siteand a Housing Fund.Green: gain. Red: mainly loss. Orange: mitigated, notremoved. Facts from the Sizewell C examination anddecision (S45); Natural England, RSPB and SuffolkWildlife Trust are grouped because the screens do notseparate their positions.
  • Gains: the developer and government (consent), and local businesses ("substantial economic opportunities", acknowledged by the councils).
  • Losses: wildlife sites (habitat and disturbance), recreation and tranquillity in the AONB, tourism during construction.
  • Mitigated, not removed: funds, compensation land and adaptive sea defences.
  • Exam move: the decision-maker weighs national need against local harms; say whose perspective each argument reflects.
Mission check

?Who commented on the plan, and who won?
Mission 10

Mission 10: A community on Kenya's coast earns money by not cutting down its mangroves. Who pays, and why?

Make a guess: A community on Kenya's coast earns money by not cutting down its mangroves. Who pays, and why?

Mission 10

Why mangroves matter

Mangrove area by region, 2020Mangrove area by region, 2020 (million ha)South and South-east Asia6.48South America2.14Western and Central Africa2.09North and Central America1.85Oceania1.46Eastern and Southern Africa0.73Other regions (East Asia; Western and Central Asia)0.040246Million hectaresSource: FAO (2023), The world’s mangroves 2000–2020,Table 3. Bars sum to 14.8 million ha (14.79 beforerounding). South and South-east Asia is nearly 44% of theworld total.
  • Mangroves: salt-tolerant trees and shrubs of the intertidal zone on tropical and subtropical coasts.
  • They store large amounts of carbon in their soils, protect coasts from storms and erosion, and support rich biodiversity.
  • Global mangrove area was 14.8 million ha in 2020. Nearly 44% (6.48 million ha) is in South and South-east Asia; Indonesia alone has 21%.
Mission 10

Issues: losses and their drivers

Drivers of mangrove loss, 2000-2020Drivers of mangrove loss, 2000–2020 (%)Aquaculture27%Natural retraction26%Other agriculture12%Oil palm8%Rice8%Other drivers (theremainder)19%0102030Other drivers: settlement, wood extraction and naturaldisasters.Source: FAO (2023), The world’s mangroves 2000–2020,Figure 7 (shares rounded). The remainder is computed:100 − (27 + 26 + 12 + 8 + 8) = 19.
  • 2000–2020: 677,000 ha of mangroves were lost, and 393,000 ha of new mangrove grew.
  • Drivers of loss: aquaculture 27%, natural retraction 26%, other agriculture 12%, oil palm 8%, rice 8%.
  • The rate of net loss fell by 44%, from 18,200 ha a year (2000–10) to 10,200 ha a year (2010–20).
Calculate
?Using screen 10.2, calculate the net loss of mangrove area between 2000 and 2020, in thousand hectares.
Mission 10

Example: Mikoko Pamoja, Gazi Bay, Kenya

  • "The world's first community-led blue carbon project": mangroves are protected and replanted, and the carbon they store is sold as credits.
  • 1,081 households take part; 22,169 credits had been issued by October 2026.
  • Plan Vivo says it "has enabled community development such as provision of schoolbooks, construction of school buildings and the provision of clean drinking water"; it won the Equator Prize in 2017.
  • Perspectives: the community gains income and services; buyers pay to offset emissions. Strength: local ownership. Limits: small scale, and income depends on the carbon market.
Quick check
?Which is the strongest argument that Mikoko Pamoja is a sustainable model?
Mission 10

Example: the Great Barrier Reef

Who uses the Great Barrier Reef?Great Barrier Reef$9 billion a year to Australia’s economy; 77,000jobsSix groups of users, each with an interestTourism$7.9 billion a year.Commercial and recreational fishingAccess to fish: zoning decides where fishers maytake.Traditional OwnersMore than 70 groups have connections to the Reef.Ports and shippingShipping routes and port access.Catchment farmersFarm runoff is managed on land, outside the MarinePark.Scientists and managers (GBRMPA)Zoning sets which activities are allowed, banned orneed a permit.Economic values from GBRMPA, citing a Deloitte study forthe Great Barrier Reef Foundation (S49). Interests as onscreens 10.6 and 10.9.
  • The Marine Park covers 344,400 km², with some 3,000 coral reefs; it was inscribed as World Heritage in 1981.
  • GBRMPA, citing a Deloitte study for the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, says the Reef contributes $9 billion a year to Australia's economy and supports 77,000 jobs; tourism generates $7.9 billion a year.
  • More than 70 Traditional Owner groups have connections to the Reef.
  • Other users: commercial and recreational fishers, shipping and ports, and farmers in the catchment.
Mission 10

The Reef's issues

  • GBRMPA's 2024 Outlook Report: "the overall outlook for the Great Barrier Reef remains one of future deterioration due largely to climate change".
  • Other threats it names: "crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks, poor water quality and some fishing activities".
  • It also found the Region "continues to be well-managed overall". Bleaching was the primary cause of coral loss in 2024–25 (Mission 4).
Calculate

UNESCO reports 115,000 km² of "no-take" and "no-entry" zones in the Great Barrier Reef. The Marine Park covers 344,400 km².

?Calculate the percentage of the Marine Park closed to taking, to one decimal place.
Mission 10

Managing reefs: evaluation (AO3)

  • Zoning: each zone sets which activities are allowed, banned or need a permit. Fishers lose access to no-take zones; tourism and fish stocks can gain.
  • Water quality: farm runoff is managed on land, outside the Marine Park.
  • Scale: no local plan can stop the global heat stress that drives bleaching. Reef management works locally; the main threat is global.
  • Exam move: "To what extent…" answers should separate what managers control (fishing, runoff) from what they cannot (ocean warming).
Mission check

?Who pays the Gazi Bay community, and why?
Mission 11

Mission 11: The world now farms more fish and shellfish than it catches. Does that solve overfishing?

Make a guess: The world now farms more fish and shellfish than it catches. Does that solve overfishing?

Mission 11

Trends in fish use

  • In 2022, for the first time, aquaculture overtook capture fisheries as the main producer of aquatic animals.
  • 2024: production of aquatic animals reached 195 million tonnes: aquaculture 103 million tonnes (53%), capture 92 million tonnes (47%).
  • Wild capture has stayed between 86 and 94 million tonnes since the late 1980s, apart from a peak of about 96 million in 2018, "as the biological and ecological limits of a number of wild fish stocks had been reached".
Mission 11

How many stocks are overfished?

Biologically sustainable stocks by fishing area, 2023Assessed stocks that were biologicallysustainable, 2023 (%)Antarctic100.0North-east Pacific89.3South-west Pacific86.8Western CentralAtlantic68.5North-east Atlantic67.3North-west Pacific67.0Eastern Indian Ocean65.1Eastern CentralPacific64.0South-east Atlantic60.0North-west Atlantic58.5Western IndianOcean58.3South-west Atlantic55.2Western CentralPacific55.1South-east Pacific52.0Eastern CentralAtlantic47.1Mediterranean andBlack Sea45.7Global 62.4%0255075100% of assessed stocksSource: FAO (2026), The State of World Fisheries andAquaculture 2026, status of fishery resources (2023assessments). Dashed line: global figure, 62.4%.
  • In 2023, 62.4% of assessed marine stocks were biologically sustainable, down from 64.5% in 2021; FAO says the fall reflects "both assessment revisions and the inclusion of new records".
  • Weighted by catch, 72.6% of landings came from sustainable stocks: large stocks tend to be better managed.
  • Regional range: 100% sustainable in the Antarctic areas and 89.3% in the North-east Pacific, but 45.7% in the Mediterranean and Black Sea and 47.1% in the Eastern Central Atlantic.
Mission 11

Marine mammals: whaling

  • In 1982 the International Whaling Commission (IWC) agreed a pause in commercial whaling, effective from the 1985/86 season. It remains in place.
  • Norway objected to the moratorium; Iceland rejoined the IWC in 2002 with a reservation to it; Japan left the IWC in 2019 and began commercial catches.
Calculate
?Using screen 11.2, calculate the percentage of assessed marine stocks that were not biologically sustainable (overfished) in 2023.
Mission 11

Alternatives: aquaculture and quotas

  • Aquaculture now supplies most aquatic animals, but it was the largest single driver (27%) of mangrove loss in 2000–2020.
  • Quotas limit the catch. Argentine red shrimp became sustainable through "strict quotas, seasonal/area closures and strong monitoring", but Argentine hake stayed overfished "despite partial recovery under quota-based management and spatial protection measures".
  • 91.3% of assessed tuna stocks were sustainable in 2023; FAO credits precautionary management by regional tuna bodies.
Mission 11

The ocean as a global commons

  • The guide frames this sub-section as "managing the oceans as a global commons": resources open to all and owned by no one, such as the high seas.
  • Hardin's tragedy of the commons (1968): when a resource is open to all, each user gains from taking more while the cost of depletion is shared, so the resource is overused.
  • Quotas, protected areas and treaties such as the High Seas Agreement are attempts to escape that tragedy.
Mission 11

Alternatives: conservation areas

How much of the ocean is protected?Share of each zone protectedNational waters: 39% of the ocean23.09% protectednot protectedAreas beyond national jurisdiction (the high seas):61% of the ocean1.45% protectednot protectedSource: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Protected Planet, marineprotected and conserved areas. Protected areas and othereffective area-based conservation measures (OECMs).Each bar is 100% of its own zone.
  • National waters are 39% of the ocean; 23.09% of them are in protected or conserved areas. The high seas (beyond national jurisdiction) are 61% of the ocean, and only 1.45% is protected.
  • The High Seas (BBNJ) Agreement, adopted in 2023, entered into force on 17 January 2026, with 104 parties by October 2026. A central aim is a system of area-based management tools, including protected areas, beyond national jurisdiction.
Mission 11

Evaluating the alternatives (AO3)

  • Protected areas need enforcement, especially far offshore.
  • Quotas work where stocks are assessed and monitored, as with tuna; they fail where they are not.
  • Aquaculture shifts pressure onto coasts (mangroves) and onto the fisheries that supply fish feed.
  • Exam move: judge viability by scale (local, regional, high seas) and by who enforces the rules.
Quick check
?Which conclusion is best supported by the FAO evidence on these screens?
Mission check

?Does farming more fish and shellfish than we catch solve overfishing?
Mission 12

Mission 12: Tankers spilled about 95% less oil in the 2010s than in the 1970s. Why has plastic proved so much harder to stop?

Make a guess: Tankers spilled about 95% less oil in the 2010s than in the 1970s. Why has plastic proved so much harder to stop?

Mission 12

Oil: a global strategy

  • MARPOL, the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, was adopted in 1973; its 1978 Protocol followed a spate of tanker accidents, and it entered into force in 1983.
  • 1992 amendments made double hulls mandatory for new oil tankers, with a phase-in for existing tankers.
Mission 12

What the record shows

Tanker oil spills by decadeNumber of spills of more than 7 tonnes1990s3582000s1812010s632020s*430100200300400Number of spillsTonnes of oil lost1990s1,134,0002000s196,0002010s164,0002020s*42,0000500,0001,000,000Tonnes of oil lost* 2020s: six years of data. Source: ITOPF, Oil tanker spillstatistics 2025. ITOPF gives no decade totals for the1970s or 1980s in its text, so none are shown.
  • Quantity: about 164,000 tonnes were lost from tanker spills in the 2010s, a 95% reduction since the 1970s.
  • Number: spills of more than 7 tonnes have fallen by over 90% since the 1970s; "there has however been little change in the last decade".
  • 1990s: 358 spills, 1,134,000 tonnes lost. 2010s: 63 spills; a single spill caused about 70% of that decade's oil lost.
Mission 12

Oil: a national strategy

  • On 24 March 1989 the tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground in Prince William Sound, Alaska, spilling nearly 11 million gallons of crude oil.
  • "In the wake of the Exxon Valdez disaster", Congress passed the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 unanimously.
  • It created a clean-up trust fund financed by a tax on oil, and requires facilities and vessels to submit plans for responding to spills.
Mission 12

The limits: Deepwater Horizon

  • Tanker rules do not cover drilling. On 20 April 2010 an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico killed 11 workers.
  • About 134 million gallons of oil spilled before the well was capped three months later.
Mission 12

Plastic: global strategies

  • Ships: MARPOL Annex V (in force 1988) imposes "the complete ban" on disposing of "all forms of plastics" into the sea from ships.
  • All sources: in March 2022, the UN Environment Assembly agreed to negotiate "an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment".
  • Six negotiating sessions followed, the last substantive one in Geneva in August 2025. A one-day organisational session (INC-5.3) followed in February 2026, and a further session (INC-5.4) was being prepared.
Mission 12

Plastic: a national strategy

Strategies against ocean pollutionOilLocal or national: Oil Pollution Act 1990 (UnitedStates)+ A clean-up trust fund financed by a tax on oil;vessels and facilities must submit spill-responseplans.− Spills still occur: Deepwater Horizon (2010)spilled about 134 million gallons.Global: MARPOL (1973; 1978 Protocol)+ Double hulls mandatory for new tankers (1992amendments); tanker spills of more than 7 tonnesdown by over 90% since the 1970s.− Tanker rules do not cover drilling; "little change inthe last decade".PlasticLocal or national: England’s carrier bag charge+ Main retailers’ single-use bags fell from 7.64billion (2014) to 126 million (2025–26).− Counts single-use plastic bags only; paper bagsand bags for life are outside the reporting.Global: MARPOL Annex V (in force 1988)+ "The complete ban" on disposing of "all forms ofplastics" into the sea from ships.− Applies to ships only.Global: UN plastics treaty talks (from March2022)+ Aim: a legally binding instrument on plasticpollution, including in the marine environment.− Still under negotiation after six sessions; anotherwas being prepared.Radioactive materialsLocal: Sellafield ion-exchange plant+ Removes caesium and strontium from used waterbefore discharge to the sea.− The treated water is still discharged to the sea.Regional: OSPAR Convention+ Nuclear-sector discharges fell 2.5-fold (totalalpha) and 12-fold (total beta, excluding tritium)since 1995–2001.− The aim is "close to zero", not zero.Global: London Convention (1972) and LondonProtocol (1996)+ Dumping of radioactive wastes banned in 1993;under the Protocol "all dumping is prohibited".− Exception: a "reverse list" of possibly acceptablewastes.Orange: local, national or regional strategy. Blue: globalstrategy. Plus: a strength. Minus: a weakness. Facts fromscreens 12.1–12.10; sources S55–S63, S76–S77, S82.Deepwater Horizon is placed against the 1990 Act as anexample of continuing spills.
  • Since 5 October 2015, large retailers in England have had to charge for single-use plastic carrier bags; since 21 May 2021 the charge is 10p and applies to all businesses.
  • Main retailers issued 7.64 billion single-use bags in 2014 (WRAP; six of the seven main retailers); in 2025–26 the seven sold 126 million, and all reporting retailers 399 million.
Calculate
?Using screen 12.6, calculate the percentage reduction in single-use bags from the main retailers, 2014 to 2025–26, to the nearest whole number.
Mission 12

Radioactive materials: a global ban

  • The trigger: under the 1972 London Convention, low-level radioactive wastes could be dumped at sea under certain conditions.
  • A voluntary moratorium followed in 1983, and in 1993 the Convention was amended to ban dumping radioactive wastes at sea.
  • Under the 1996 London Protocol, in force since 2006, "all dumping is prohibited", except for possibly acceptable wastes on a "reverse list".
Mission 12

Regional and local strategies

  • Regional: under the OSPAR Convention, North-east Atlantic states aim for concentrations "close to zero for artificial radioactive substances".
  • Local: at Sellafield, Cumbria, an ion-exchange plant removes caesium and strontium from used water before discharge to the sea.
Mission 12

Has it worked? (AO3)

  • OSPAR's fourth periodic evaluation (2016), as summarised in the UK's 2018 review, found that nuclear-sector discharges had fallen 2.5-fold for total alpha and 12-fold for total beta (excluding tritium) since the 1995–2001 baseline.
  • Exam move: separate what a strategy aims for ("close to zero") from what the evidence shows.
Quick check
?England's carrier bag charge is best described as:
Mission check

?Why has plastic proved harder to stop than tanker oil spills?
Mission 13

Mission 13: Russia, Denmark and Canada have each asked a UN body to recognise their seabed rights in the Arctic Ocean. Who owns the ocean floor?

Make a guess: Russia, Denmark and Canada have each asked a UN body to recognise their seabed rights in the Arctic Ocean. Who owns the ocean floor?

Mission 13

UNCLOS: the zones

UNCLOS maritime zonesBaselineTerritorial sea: up to 12 nmContiguous zone: up to 24 nmEEZ: up to 200 nm01224200350The AreabeyondnationallimitsContinental shelf: to 200 nm, andin some cases up to 350 nmDistance from the baseline, in nautical miles (nm)Schematic: the horizontal scale is not linear. Distances asin UNCLOS (1982) (S64); the shelf limit is 350 nm or 100nm beyond the 2,500 m depth line, and on submarineridges 350 nm.
  • The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982) entered into force in 1994; it has 172 parties.
  • Territorial sea: up to 12 nautical miles (nm) from the baseline. Ships of all states have a right of innocent passage.
  • Contiguous zone: up to 24 nm, for customs, fiscal, immigration and sanitary control.
  • Exclusive economic zone (EEZ): up to 200 nm, with sovereign rights over living and non-living resources and energy.
Mission 13

The continental shelf and the Area

  • A state's continental shelf can extend beyond 200 nm where its continental margin does. The limit is 350 nm or 100 nm beyond the 2,500 m depth line; on submarine ridges it is 350 nm.
  • Rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own have no EEZ or continental shelf.
  • The seabed beyond national limits is the Area, managed by the International Seabed Authority (ISA). UNCLOS calls the Area and its resources "the common heritage of mankind".
Quick check
?A state finds oil 150 nm off its coast, beyond its territorial sea. What right does it have?
Mission 13

Abiotic demand: minerals

  • Demand for battery metals is rising with electric vehicles and energy storage: lithium demand rose by nearly 30% in 2024, and nickel, cobalt and graphite by 6–8%.
  • On the deep seabed, polymetallic nodules contain nickel, copper, cobalt and manganese; the richest deposits lie at 4,000–6,000 m, notably in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, Pacific.
  • The ISA has issued 17 exploration contracts for nodules there. Its exploitation regulations, in development since 2014, are still in draft.
Mission 13

Abiotic demand: Arctic oil and gas

  • USGS estimated that 90 billion barrels of undiscovered oil and 1,669 trillion cubic feet of gas may lie north of the Arctic Circle, about 84% of it offshore (2008 estimate).
  • Less sea ice makes these resources more accessible (screen 13.9).
Mission 13

Consequences: evidence from a 1979 test

  • In 1979, a mining test in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone cut tracks across the seabed. Scientists revisited them in 2023.
  • After 44 years, physical changes persisted and communities in the tracks were still altered, though some fauna had begun to re-establish.
  • The authors conclude that mining impacts "will be persistent over at least decadal timeframes".
  • Exam move: one small, old test is limited evidence for industrial-scale mining. Say so, and say why it still matters.
Quick check
?What best explains rising interest in deep-sea mining?
Mission 13

Case study: the contested Arctic seabed

Arctic seabed submissions70°N80°NGreenlandCanadaRussiaAlaskaNorwayNorth Pole123Approximate 200 nm limit from the coastsLomonosov Ridge (schematic position)1Russia: submitted 2001, revised 2015. CLCSadopted recommendations on the revisedsubmission in February 20232Denmark/Greenland: submitted December 20143Canada: submitted May 2019Markers show who submitted, not who owns the seabed:submitted areas are not outlined, and their boundaries arenot drawn. The 200 nm limit is approximate (about 370km, buffered in the projection) and ignores disputed oroverlapping limits. The ridge is schematic. Submissions:UN CLCS (S71); Denmark’s executive summary (S72).Coastlines: Natural Earth.
  • Arctic sea ice area in September fell by about 40% between 1979–88 and 2010–19. The Arctic is likely to be practically ice-free in September at least once before 2050.
  • Less ice means more access to sea routes and resources, which raises the stakes.
  • Submissions to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS): Russia (2001; revised 2015), Denmark/Greenland (December 2014), Canada (May 2019).
Mission 13

Overlapping claims

  • Denmark's submission states that Canada's outer limits "would overlap" those of Greenland's northern shelf, and that "there are potential overlaps of entitlement".
  • The Lomonosov Ridge, "a sliver of continental crust that divides the Arctic Ocean into its two main basins", is central. Denmark argues that it and other ridges are "morphologically continuous with the land mass of Greenland".
  • The CLCS adopted recommendations on Russia's revised submission in February 2023.
Mission 13

How the dispute is managed

  • In the 2008 Ilulissat Declaration, the five Arctic Ocean coastal states committed to the law of the sea and to "orderly settlement of any possible overlapping claims".
  • In 2014 Denmark/Greenland and Russia agreed by exchange of notes not to object to the CLCS considering each other's submissions, "without prejudice" to later delimitation.
Mission 13

Evaluating the process (AO3)

  • The CLCS assesses the science of each claim; UNCLOS states that the shelf rules are "without prejudice to the question of delimitation" between states, so overlaps are settled by the states themselves.
  • So far, the states have used scientific submissions and diplomatic notes.
  • Uncertainties: resource estimates are old and probabilistic, and access depends on sea ice and costs.
  • Exam move: separate the legal process (orderly so far) from the strategic stakes (rising as sea ice retreats).
Quick check
?What is the role of the CLCS in the Arctic?
Mission check

?Who owns the ocean floor?
Mission 14

Mission 14: In 2024, ships from Shenzhen to Rotterdam began sailing about 3,000 extra nautical miles around Africa. Why take the long way?

Make a guess: In 2024, ships from Shenzhen to Rotterdam began sailing about 3,000 extra nautical miles around Africa. Why take the long way?

Mission 14

The strategic value of oceans

Ocean choke points1234567ShenzhenRotterdamShenzhen–Rotterdam via Suez: about 10,000nm (about 31 days)via the Cape of Good Hope: about 13,000 nm(about 41 days)1Strait of Hormuz: oil flow averaged 20 millionbarrels a day in 2024, about 20% of worldpetroleum liquids consumption.2Bab el-Mandeb and the Red Sea.3Suez Canal: about 10% of global trade by tonnage.4Panama Canal.5Strait of Malacca.6Cape of Good Hope.7Hans Island (Tartupaluk).Sources: US EIA (16 Jun 2025); UNCTAD, Review ofMaritime Transport 2024. Routes are schematic. Map:Natural Earth, Robinson projection.
  • UNCTAD: "Shipping is the backbone of globalized trade and smooth navigation through maritime chokepoints is crucial for trade".
  • A choke point is a narrow passage, such as a strait or canal, that a large share of shipping must use.
  • Islands matter too: they can generate a territorial sea, an EEZ and a continental shelf (Mission 13).
Mission 14

The Strait of Hormuz

  • In 2024, oil flow through the Strait of Hormuz averaged 20 million barrels a day, about 20% of world petroleum liquids consumption.
  • 84% of the crude oil and condensate passing through it went to Asian markets.
  • Few alternative routes exist if it is closed.
Mission 14

The Red Sea and the Suez Canal

  • The Suez Canal carries about 10% of global trade by tonnage.
  • "Attacks on vessels in the Red Sea prompted most shipping lines to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope".
  • By June 2024, transits through the Suez Canal were down 70% against mid-December 2023, and arrivals at the Cape of Good Hope had risen by 89%.
Calculate

Shenzhen to Rotterdam is about 10,000 nautical miles (about 31 days) through the Suez Canal, and about 13,000 nautical miles (about 41 days) around the Cape of Good Hope.

?Calculate the percentage increase in distance from rerouting.
Mission 14

The Panama Canal (synthesis)

  • Drought linked to El Niño (Mission 2) cut daily transits to 22 in December 2023, against the Canal Authority's "regular scenario" of 36. UNCTAD gives a long-term average of 38 ships a day.
  • Over the first quarter of 2024, transits were about 20% lower than a year earlier.
  • A climate event far out in the Pacific disrupted a canal that serves world trade.
Quick check
?Why do choke points give oceans strategic value?
Mission 14

A contested island: Hans Island (Tartupaluk)

Hans Island (Tartupaluk)Hans Island(Tartupaluk)Ellesmere Island(Canada)GreenlandNares Strait200 kmNorth is up. Canada (orange tint); Greenland, Kingdom ofDenmark (blue tint).Hans Island (Tartupaluk), about 1.3 km²The 2022 line follows anatural ridge:about 60% Denmark(Greenland)about 40% CanadaAgreement signed 14 June 2022Sources: Global Affairs Canada (14 June 2022); Library ofCongress, In Custodia Legis (22 June 2022). Islandposition and outline: Natural Earth 10m. The dividing lineitself is not drawn: its position is not given in thesesources.
  • A 1.3 km², uninhabited island lying "midway" between Canada and Greenland.
  • A 1973 treaty on the maritime border "deliberately left the border undefined" through the island.
  • For decades, both countries' forces occasionally landed, raised their flags and left a bottle of whisky or aquavit: the "Whisky War".
Mission 14

Settled by negotiation

  • On 14 June 2022, Canada and the Kingdom of Denmark, together with Greenland, signed an agreement that resolved the boundary over Tartupaluk (Hans Island).
  • The island is "divided along a natural ridge", with roughly 60% to Denmark (Greenland) and the rest to Canada.
  • It keeps "continued access to and freedom of movement on the entirety of the island"; Inuit of Nunavut and Greenland were consulted.
  • The agreement also fixed the continental-shelf boundary within 200 nm in the Lincoln Sea.
Mission 14

Islands, canals and choke points (AO3)

  • An island's value lies partly in the sea it generates: territorial sea, EEZ and shelf.
  • Hans Island's dispute, like the Arctic seabed overlaps, was settled by negotiation; choke points such as the Red Sea show how insecurity at sea quickly reaches world trade.
  • Exam move: compare disputes by what is at stake (resources, routes, symbols) and by how they are managed (law, negotiation, force).
Mission check

?Why did ships from Shenzhen to Rotterdam take the long way round Africa?
Exam technique

How Option B is examined (Paper 1)

Paper 1 at a glanceStandard Level (SL)two options1 hour 30 minutesHigher Level (HL)three options2 hours 15 minutesEach option: 45 minutes, 20 marksStructured question10 marksExtended answer10 marksone question, from a choice of twoPaper 1 = 35% of the grade, at SL and HLSource: IBO, Geography guide (first assessment 2019;updated 2022).
  • Paper 1 is 35% of the grade at both SL and HL. SL answers two options in 1 hour 30 minutes; HL answers three in 2 hours 15 minutes: 45 minutes per option.
  • Each option has a structured question and one extended-answer question from a choice of two: 10 + 10 = 20 marks.
  • Questions may use topographic maps, which the guide flags as especially relevant to oceans and coastal margins.
Exam technique

Command terms for the extended answer

  • Evaluate: "Make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations".
  • To what extent: "Consider the merits or otherwise of an argument or concept", with conclusions "supported with empirical evidence and sound argument".
  • Discuss: "Offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors or hypotheses".
Exam technique

What the top band rewards (9–10 marks)

  • "In-depth and question-specific (topic and command term)".
  • Examples, statistics and details are integrated and explained: name the place, the date and the scale.
  • Evaluation includes "cause and effect relations, other perspectives; strengths and weaknesses of evidence", as with Seager's model study or Medmerry's two cost figures.
  • A balanced conclusion aligned with the evidence; maps and diagrams annotated and explained.
Recap

The big ideas

  • Currents and the conveyor belt move heat and nutrients; ENSO shifts rainfall and fisheries across the globe (Panama, southern Africa, Peru, the Horn of Africa).
  • Hurricanes need warm water, spin, low shear and a starting disturbance; storm surge is often the deadliest hazard (Ian).
  • The ocean is a carbon sink, but its uptake acidifies seawater and adds to the heat stress on coral reefs.
  • Lithology, waves and littoral drift shape coasts (Holderness, Spurn); dunes build by succession; isostatic and eustatic change make coasts advance or retreat.
  • Management involves trade-offs between actors (Medmerry, Sizewell C, Mikoko Pamoja, the Great Barrier Reef).
  • The oceans are a global commons: resources, pollution, sovereignty and choke points are managed from local to global scales (FAO, MARPOL, UNCLOS, the Arctic, Hans Island).

Final screen. Score, the mission list ticked, and "Next: test yourself in the Verify stage" (links to the Verify quiz).

🏆

Mini-lesson complete!

⭐⭐⭐

You've worked through Oceans and coastal margins for IB Diploma Geography SL and HL. 🎉

  1. Mission 1The Gulf Stream carries more water than all the world's rivers combined. Is that why north-west Europe has mild winters?
  2. Mission 2In December 2023 the Panama Canal let through 22 ships a day, against 36 in its "regular scenario". What did a patch of warm Pacific Ocean have to do with it?
  3. Mission 3Hurricane Ian hit Florida with 130-knot winds in 2022. Why was water, not wind, its deadliest hazard?
  4. Mission 4The ocean took up 29% of the CO₂ humans emitted over the last decade. Why is that bad news for coral reefs?
  5. Mission 5Between 1951 and 2004 the cliffs at Aldbrough, on England's Holderness coast, retreated about 2 m a year. Why do they disappear so fast?
  6. Mission 6Spurn Point is over three miles long and in places only 50 m wide. How did a finger of sand form across the mouth of the Humber?
  7. Mission 7On the coast of the Gulf of Bothnia, the land rises out of the sea by about 0.9 m a century. Elsewhere, coasts are drowning. How can both be true?
  8. Mission 8By 2014 the Environment Agency had built new banks inland at Medmerry, West Sussex, and let the sea flood the land between. Why give land to the sea?
  9. Mission 91,282 people and organisations sent formal comments on one plan for the Suffolk coast. Who were they, and who won?
  10. Mission 10A community on Kenya's coast earns money by not cutting down its mangroves. Who pays, and why?
  11. Mission 11The world now farms more fish and shellfish than it catches. Does that solve overfishing?
  12. Mission 12Tankers spilled about 95% less oil in the 2010s than in the 1970s. Why has plastic proved so much harder to stop?
  13. Mission 13Russia, Denmark and Canada have each asked a UN body to recognise their seabed rights in the Arctic Ocean. Who owns the ocean floor?
  14. Mission 14In 2024, ships from Shenzhen to Rotterdam began sailing about 3,000 extra nautical miles around Africa. Why take the long way?

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Verify stage.

📣 Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

→ Back to IB Geography · SL

Sources for this lesson are listed at the bottom of the page.

Sources (88)

The sources behind the facts and figures in this lesson.

  1. S1 IBO, Geography guide (first assessment 2019; updated 2022)
  2. S2 NOAA National Ocean Service, "What is a gyre?"
  3. S3 NOAA National Ocean Service Education, "Currents: Surface ocean currents" (Coriolis effect)
  4. S4 NOAA National Ocean Service, "How fast is the Gulf Stream?" (last updated 23 Sept 2026)
  5. S5 NOAA National Ocean Service, "What is the global ocean conveyor belt?" (last updated 23 Sept 2026)
  6. S6 NOAA National Ocean Service Education, "Thermohaline circulation"
  7. S7 Cunningham S.A. et al. (2007), "Temporal variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5°N", Science 317: 935–938
  8. S8 NOAA National Ocean Service, "What is upwelling?"
  9. S9 FAO (2026), The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2026 (online chapters: global production; capture production; status of fishery resources)
  10. S10 Seager R. et al. (2002), "Is the Gulf Stream responsible for Europe's mild winters?", Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 128: 2563–86
  11. S11 IPCC (2021), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policymakers (A.1.5, A.1.6, A.1.7, A.4.3, B.4.1, B.5.3, B.2.5, C.3.4)
  12. S12 NOAA Climate.gov, M. L'Heureux, "What is the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in a nutshell?" (5 May 2014)
  13. S13 NOAA Climate.gov, T. Di Liberto, "The Walker Circulation: ENSO's atmospheric buddy" (1 Aug 2014)
  14. S14 NOAA National Ocean Service, "What are El Niño and La Niña?" (last updated 23 Sept 2026)
  15. S15 NOAA Climate Prediction Center, "ENSO frequently asked questions" (page last modified 26 Apr 2012)
  16. S16 WMO, El Niño/La Niña Update (February 2024; published 5 Mar 2024)
  17. S17 Panama Canal Authority, "Panama Canal to increase daily transits to 24 starting in January" (15 Dec 2023)
  18. S18 SADC, Regional Humanitarian Appeal Addendum: El Niño-induced drought (November 2024), via ReliefWeb
  19. S19 WMO press release, "Triple-dip La Niña persists, prolonging drought and flooding" (30 Nov 2022)
  20. S20 World Weather Attribution, "Human-induced climate change increased drought severity in Horn of Africa" (27 Apr 2023)
  21. S21 WMO, "Tropical cyclone" topic page
  22. S22 NOAA AOML Hurricane Research Division, Hurricane FAQ
  23. S23 NOAA National Hurricane Center, "Storm surge overview"
  24. S24 Bucci L. et al., NOAA National Hurricane Center, Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Ian (AL092022) (revised 12 Mar 2026; original 2 Apr 2023)
  25. S25 FEMA, "Hurricane Ian: Two years into recovery" (19 Sept 2024)
  26. S26 NOAA Education, "Carbon cycle" resource collection
  27. S27 Feely R.A., Sabine C.L., Takahashi T., Wanninkhof R. (2001), "Uptake and storage of carbon dioxide in the ocean: the global CO₂ survey", Oceanography 14(4): 18–32 (NOAA PMEL)
  28. S28 Friedlingstein P. et al. (2026), "Global Carbon Budget 2025", Earth System Science Data 18: 3211–3288
  29. S29 NOAA Education, "Ocean acidification" resource collection
  30. S30 IPCC (2018), Global Warming of 1.5 °C, Summary for Policymakers (B.4.2, B.4.3)
  31. S31 NOAA NESDIS, "World's fourth mass coral bleaching event likely ended in 2025" (2 June 2026)
  32. S32 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Annual summary report of coral reef condition 2024/25 (6 Aug 2025)
  33. S33 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Annual summary report of coral reef condition 2025/26 (11 Aug 2026)
  34. S34 British Geological Survey, K. Lee, "Six changing coastlines and how climate change could affect them" (April 2022)
  35. S35 British Geological Survey, "Landslides and coastal erosion at Aldbrough, East Riding of Yorkshire" (landslide case study)
  36. S36 National Trust, "Studland Bay" visitor page (Old Harry Rocks)
  37. S37 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, "Spurn National Nature Reserve"
  38. S38 JNCC, Special Areas of Conservation habitat accounts: H2110 Embryonic shifting dunes; H2120 Shifting dunes with marram ("white dunes"); H2130 Fixed dunes ("grey dunes"); H2190 Humid dune slacks
  39. S39 UNESCO World Heritage Centre, "High Coast / Kvarken Archipelago" (list entry 898)
  40. S40 UNESCO World Heritage Centre, "West Norwegian Fjords – Geirangerfjord and Nærøyfjord" (list entry 1195)
  41. S41 Environment Agency with Chichester and Arun District Councils, Pagham to East Head coastal defence strategy 2007: initial consultation
  42. S42 Environment Agency press release, "Medmerry showcased at the IUCN World Conservation Congress" (6 Sept 2016)
  43. S43 Environment Agency news story, "EA habitat creation and flood scheme leading the way on new 'Global Standard' for nature-based solutions" (10 Nov 2021)
  44. S44 Environment Agency press release, "Environment Agency finds out what's beneath surface in Ventnor" (31 Aug 2023)
  45. S45 Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Sizewell C Project: decision letter (20 July 2022), Planning Inspectorate ref. EN010012
  46. S46 Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, press release on the Sizewell C final investment decision (22 July 2025)
  47. S47 FAO (2023), The world's mangroves 2000–2020
  48. S48 Plan Vivo, "Mikoko Pamoja – Kenya" project page
  49. S49 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, "Reef facts" (updated 2 Sept 2026)
  50. S50 UNESCO World Heritage Centre, "Great Barrier Reef" (list entry 154)
  51. S51 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, "Zoning"
  52. S52 International Whaling Commission, "Commercial whaling"
  53. S53 UNEP-WCMC, Protected Planet, "Marine protected and conserved areas"
  54. S54 UN Treaty Collection, Agreement on Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction (XXI-10), status as at 22 Oct 2026
  55. S55 ITOPF, Oil tanker spill statistics 2025
  56. S56 International Maritime Organization, "International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL)"
  57. S57 NOAA Office of Response and Restoration, "Deepwater Horizon oil spill"
  58. S58 US EPA, "Summary of the Oil Pollution Act"
  59. S59 Defra, Single-use plastic carrier bags charge: data for England 2025 to 2026
  60. S60 UNEP, "Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution"
  61. S61 International Maritime Organization, "Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter" (London Convention and Protocol)
  62. S62 BEIS/DESNZ, UK strategy for radioactive discharges: 2018 review of the 2009 strategy (22 June 2018)
  63. S63 Sellafield Ltd, "The Sellafield Site Ion Exchange Effluent Plant (SIXEP)", GOV.UK case study (June 2025)
  64. S64 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), Arts 3, 17, 33, 56, 57, 76, 121, 136
  65. S65 UN Treaty Collection, UNCLOS (XXI-6), status as at 22 Oct 2026
  66. S66 International Seabed Authority, "Exploration contracts"
  67. S67 International Seabed Authority, "The Mining Code"
  68. S68 Jones D.O.B. et al. (2025), "Long-term impact and biological recovery in a deep-sea mining track", Nature 642: 112–118
  69. S69 IEA (2025), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025, executive summary
  70. S70 USGS (2008), Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the Arctic Circle, Fact Sheet 2008-3049
  71. S71 UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, CLCS "Submissions, through the Secretary-General" table
  72. S72 Kingdom of Denmark with the Government of Greenland (2014), Partial submission: the Northern Continental Shelf of Greenland – executive summary
  73. S73 US EIA, Today in Energy, "Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint" (16 June 2025)
  74. S74 UNCTAD (2024), Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating maritime chokepoints
  75. S75 British Geological Survey, "Erosion" (Discovering Geology: geological processes)
  76. S76 NOAA Damage Assessment, Remediation and Restoration Program, "Story map: examining the Oil Pollution Act's legacy through 30 oil spills" (21 Aug 2020)
  77. S77 NOAA Office of Response and Restoration, "Exxon Valdez oil spill"
  78. S78 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, "Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2024: ecosystem under pressure" (updated 23 Aug 2024)
  79. S79 International Seabed Authority, "Polymetallic nodules"
  80. S80 NOAA National Hurricane Center, "Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale"
  81. S81 Hardin G. (1968), "The Tragedy of the Commons", Science 162: 1243–1248 (citation confirmed from the Crossref record, doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243)
  82. S82 IMO, London Convention document LC 38/16, Annex 9: Literature review performed in support of the 25-year scientific study of ocean dumping of radioactive wastes
  83. S83 The Ilulissat Declaration, Arctic Ocean Conference, Ilulissat, Greenland (28 May 2008), as published by the Norwegian government
  84. S84 Kenya, National Drought Early Warning Bulletin, September 2022, via ReliefWeb
  85. S85 FAO newsroom, "FAO Report: Global fisheries and aquaculture production reaches a new record high" (7 June 2024)
  86. S86 Library of Congress Law Library, In Custodia Legis, "The Hans Island peace agreement between Canada, Denmark, and Greenland" (22 June 2022)
  87. S87 Global Affairs Canada, "Canada and the Kingdom of Denmark, together with Greenland, reach historic agreement on long-standing boundary disputes" (14 June 2022)
  88. S88 NOAA Climate.gov, R. Lindsey, "Climate variability: Oceanic Niño Index" (30 Aug 2009; archived June 2025)