This lesson studies three influential theories in depth: natural law (Aquinas), situation ethics (Fletcher) and virtue ethics (Aristotle).
Notice how each locates rightness differently — in rational precepts, in loving outcomes, or in character. Answer the questions and collect ⭐.
Thomas Aquinas held that reason can discern God’s purposes in nature. The synderesis rule is to "do good and avoid evil." He distinguished four types of law (eternal, divine, natural, human).
The five primary precepts are: Preservation of life, Ordering of society, Worship of God, Education, Reproduction (POWER). From these, reason derives secondary precepts. He also taught real vs apparent goods and the doctrine of double effect.
Joseph Fletcher (Situation Ethics, 1966) makes agape (selfless love) the only absolute; every rule can be broken if love demands it.
It is teleological — the loving outcome decides the act.
Aristotle (Nicomachean Ethics) asks not "what should I do?" but "what kind of person should I be?" The goal is eudaimonia (flourishing).
Sort each feature into the theory it belongs to.
Match each theory to its key figure or idea.
Natural law: Aquinas: synderesis, five primary precepts (POWER), double effect
Situation ethics: Fletcher: agape, four working principles, six propositions
Virtue ethics: Aristotle: eudaimonia, the mean, habituation, phronesis
Evaluation: Universal vs flexible vs character-focused — each with strengths and gaps
In essays, apply all three to the same dilemma to show you understand them. Press Finish.
You've worked through Three Ethical Theories. 🎉
Your stars: 0 / 0
Next: test yourself in the Verify stage.