โ† Back to subjects
โญ 0
Edexcel A-level Religious Studies (9RS0) ยท Religion and Ethics: Application of Ethical Theories
Mini-Lesson

Applying Ethical Theories

This lesson applies ethical theories to two issues on the specification: war and peace and sexual ethics.

You will learn the just war criteria and pacifism, then see how natural law, situation ethics and virtue ethics handle sex and relationships. Answer the questions and collect โญ.

Just war

Just war theory

Rooted in Augustine and Aquinas, just war theory sets conditions under which war can be morally justified.

  • Jus ad bellum (right to go to war): just cause, legitimate authority, right intention, last resort, proportionality, reasonable chance of success.
  • Jus in bello (right conduct in war): proportionality of force, and discrimination โ€” protecting non-combatants.

A modern addition is jus post bellum โ€” justice after war.

Check

Ad bellum vs in bello

1"Non-combatants must not be deliberately targeted." This is a principle of:
Pacifism

Pacifism and applying theories

  • Absolute pacifism rejects all violence; contingent (conditional) pacifism opposes particular wars.
  • Natural law can support just war (preserving life and ordering society) but forbids targeting the innocent.
  • Situation ethics asks only what agape requires here โ€” it could justify or oppose a war case by case.
Check

Situation ethics and war

2How would situation ethics decide whether a war is justified?
Sexual ethics

Sexual ethics

Issues include pre-marital and extra-marital sex, contraception and homosexuality.

  • Natural law emphasises the reproductive precept: sex has a procreative purpose, so it traditionally restricts sex to heterosexual marriage.
  • Situation ethics judges each relationship by whether it expresses agape.
  • Virtue ethics asks whether conduct expresses virtues such as faithfulness, honesty and love.
Check

Natural law on sex

3Why does traditional natural law restrict the purpose of sex?
Contrast

Comparing the verdicts

On the same case โ€” say a committed same-sex relationship โ€” the theories can diverge sharply: natural law may object on procreative grounds, while situation ethics and virtue ethics may approve if the relationship expresses love, fidelity and other virtues. This shows how the method of a theory drives its conclusions.

Check

Method drives verdict

4Two theories reach opposite verdicts on the same case mainly because they:
Sort it

Which category?

Sort each principle into the correct category.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Jus ad bellum

โš”๏ธ Jus in bello

โ˜ฎ๏ธ Pacifism

Match

Theory to stance on sexual ethics

Match each theory to how it approaches sexual ethics.

Statement
Answer
Recap

The big ideas to know

Just war: Jus ad bellum (going to war) and jus in bello (conduct); Augustine and Aquinas

Pacifism: Absolute vs contingent

Sexual ethics: Natural law (procreative), situation ethics (agape), virtue ethics (character)

Key skill: Show how a theoryโ€™s method drives its verdict

Strong answers apply theories precisely and weigh their conclusions. Press Finish.

๐Ÿ†

Mini-lesson complete!

โญโญโญ

You've worked through Applying Ethical Theories. ๐ŸŽ‰

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage, then lock it in with Verify.

๐Ÿ“ฃ Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

โ†’ Back to all subjects