Edexcel A-level Religious Studies (9RS0) · Philosophy of Religion: Religious Experience
Mini-Lesson
Religious Experience
Can a direct encounter with the divine be evidence for God? This lesson examines the nature and influence of religious experience through William James, Rudolf Otto and Richard Swinburne, and the challenges they face.
You will meet mystical, numinous, conversion and corporate experiences, and ask whether they justify religious belief. Answer the questions and collect ⭐.
Types
Kinds of religious experience
Mystical — a sense of union with a greater reality (James's focus).
Numinous — awe before a wholly other, transcendent presence (Otto's focus).
Conversion — a reorientation of the self, e.g. St Paul on the Damascus road.
Corporate — shared experiences within a community, e.g. revival meetings.
Experiences may be direct (of God) or indirect (a changed way of seeing the world).
James
William James
William James (The Varieties of Religious Experience, 1902) studied first-hand accounts and identified four marks of mystical experience:
Ineffability — beyond words;
Noetic quality — it conveys knowledge/insight;
Transiency — short-lived;
Passivity — the person feels acted upon.
James was a pragmatist: experiences are validated by their fruits — the good effects they produce in a person's life.
Check
James's four marks
1Which set correctly lists James's four marks of mystical experience?
Otto
Rudolf Otto
Rudolf Otto (The Idea of the Holy, 1917) described the numinous — the non-rational feeling of the holy. Its object is the mysterium tremendum et fascinans:
mysterium — wholly other, beyond comprehension;
tremendum — awe-inspiring, even dread;
fascinans — compelling, attractive.
For Otto the numinous is a distinctive, irreducible category — not reducible to ethics or reason.
Check
The numinous
2Otto's phrase mysterium tremendum et fascinans describes an experience that is:
Swinburne
Richard Swinburne
Richard Swinburne (The Existence of God, 1979) defends experience with two principles:
Principle of Credulity — if it seems to someone that X is present, then probably X is present, unless there is special reason to doubt it.
Principle of Testimony — we should normally believe what others honestly report.
Together these make religious experience a rational basis for belief unless defeated by counter-evidence.
Check
Principle of credulity
3Swinburne's Principle of Credulity says that:
Challenges
Challenges
Sigmund Freud: religious experience is an illusion rooted in wish-fulfilment and a projected father-figure.
Physiological / neurological explanations: experiences may be produced by the brain — e.g. Michael Persinger's temporal-lobe stimulation research.
Verification and interpretation: experiences are private, unrepeatable and already interpreted through the subject's religious tradition.
Check
A challenge
4Which is a naturalistic challenge to religious experience?
Sort it
Whose idea is it?
Sort each idea by the thinker who is associated with it.
👤 James
⛰️ Otto
📊 Swinburne
Match
Term to meaning
Match each key term to its meaning.
Statement
Answer
Recap
The big ideas to know
James: Varieties (1902): ineffable, noetic, transient, passive; validated by fruits
Otto: Idea of the Holy (1917): the numinous — mysterium tremendum et fascinans
Swinburne: Principles of credulity and testimony make experience rational evidence
Challenges: Freud (wish-fulfilment), physiological (Persinger), problems of verification
A strong answer weighs whether experience is evidence for God or explicable naturally. Press Finish.
🏆
Mini-lesson complete!
⭐⭐⭐
You've worked through Religious Experience. 🎉
Your stars: 0 / 0
Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage, then lock it in with Verify.
📣 Smashed it? Share your score
Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.