← Back to subjects
0
Edexcel A-level Religious Studies (9RS0) · Religion and Ethics: Significant Concepts
Mini-Lesson

Significant Concepts in Ethics

Before studying particular theories you need the toolkit of ethics: the vocabulary that lets you classify and compare any moral argument.

This lesson maps meta / normative / applied ethics, the deontological vs teleological divide, and absolutism vs relativism. Answer the questions and collect ⭐.

The map

Three levels of ethics

  • Meta-ethics asks what moral words mean and whether moral facts exist (e.g. what does "good" mean?).
  • Normative ethics proposes standards for right action (e.g. natural law, utilitarianism).
  • Applied ethics uses those standards on concrete issues (e.g. abortion, war).
Deon vs teleo

Deontological and teleological

  • Deontological ethics judges an act by the act itself — its rightness lies in duties, rules or intentions, not results (e.g. Kant, aspects of natural law).
  • Teleological / consequentialist ethics judges an act by its end or consequences (e.g. utilitarianism, situation ethics).
Check

Teleological ethics

1A teleological ethical theory judges an action by:
Absolute vs relative

Absolutism and relativism

  • Moral absolutism: some acts are right or wrong for everyone, always, regardless of circumstances (e.g. natural law’s core precepts).
  • Moral relativism: right and wrong depend on culture, situation or individual (e.g. situation ethics is relativistic — only love is fixed).
Check

Relativism

2Which statement best expresses moral relativism?
Approaches

The major approaches

  • Natural law (Aquinas): reason discerns God-given precepts — largely deontological/absolutist.
  • Kantian deontology: act only on maxims you could will as universal law — deontological/absolutist.
  • Utilitarianism (Bentham, Mill): maximise welfare — teleological/relativist.
  • Virtue ethics (Aristotle): focus on character rather than acts or rules.
Check

Classifying a theory

3Which of these is a deontological, absolutist theory?
Meta-ethics preview

Cognitive and non-cognitive

In meta-ethics, cognitivists think moral statements can be true or false (they describe something); non-cognitivists think they express attitudes or commands rather than facts. You will study this in detail under Ethical Language.

Sort it

Classify each approach

Sort each item by the concept it illustrates.

🔒 Absolutist

🔁 Relativist

🔤 Meta-ethical

Match

Term to definition

Match each concept to its definition.

Statement
Answer
Recap

The big ideas to know

Three levels: Meta-ethics (meaning), normative (standards), applied (issues)

Deon vs teleo: Act itself (duty/rule) vs consequences/end

Absolute vs relative: Fixed for all vs dependent on situation/culture

Classifying: Natural law & Kant = deontological/absolutist; utilitarianism & situation ethics = teleological/relativist

Use these labels to dissect any ethical argument in an essay. Press Finish.

🏆

Mini-lesson complete!

⭐⭐⭐

You've worked through Significant Concepts in Ethics. 🎉

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage, then lock it in with Verify.

📣 Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

→ Back to all subjects