4 missions. Guess, learn, then check. Your place is saved.
Mission 1Most crimes never reach the police. So how can anyone count crime?
Mission 2Nobody is born knowing how to shoplift. So who teaches it?
Mission 3Could a personality test predict who ends up in court?
Mission 4Many people leave prison and offend again. What might work better?
The specification points and sources are listed under the lesson: see Sources.
Mission 1
Most crimes never reach the police. So how can anyone count crime?
Make a guess: Most crimes never reach the police. So how can anyone count crime?
Criminal psychology · defining and measuring crime
Five types of crime
A crime is an act that breaks the law and can be punished by the state.
OCR groups offences into five types:
Type
Examples
Violent
assault, murder, threatening someone with a weapon
Drug-related
possessing or supplying illegal drugs
Acquisitive
theft, burglary, shoplifting, fraud (gaining money or property)
Sexual
sexual assault, indecent exposure
Anti-social
vandalism, graffiti, harassing neighbours
Criminal psychology · defining and measuring crime
Crime as a social construct
A social construct is an idea a society creates, not a fixed fact.
Crime is deviation from norms (unwritten social rules) that has been made law. Queue-jumping breaks a norm, but no law.
Culture: alcohol is legal for UK adults but illegal in Kuwait.
Time: sex between men in private was partly decriminalised in England and Wales in 1967; smoking in enclosed public places was banned in England in 2007.
Sort it
?Put each offence into the right type of crime.
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Criminal psychology · defining and measuring crime
Official statistics
Official statistics are crimes recorded by the police, published by the ONS for England and Wales.
A crime counts only if it is reported and then recorded. Crime missing from police records is the dark figure.
Only about 36% of incidents in the Crime Survey for England and Wales were reported to the police (ONS, 2026).
Strength: useful for serious crimes such as murder. Weakness: recording rule changes alter totals.
Criminal psychology · defining and measuring crime
Self-report
In a self-report study, people answer questionnaires or interviews about crimes they have committed (offender surveys) or experienced (victim surveys, such as the Crime Survey for England and Wales).
Strength: reveals crimes nobody told the police about, so it helps to estimate the dark figure.
Weaknesses: people may forget or exaggerate, and social desirability leads some to hide offences to look good. Answers cannot be checked.
Quick check
?A researcher gives anonymous questionnaires to 500 fifteen-year-olds, asking how often they have damaged property in the last year. Which method is this, and what is its main weakness?
Calculate
?A victim survey in one town records 250 incidents of crime. The victims say 90 of them were reported to the police. What percentage of the incidents were reported?
%
Sort it
?Which method of measuring crime does each point describe?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Mission check
?Most crimes never reach the police. So how can anyone count crime?
Nobody can count every crime directly. Official statistics count the crimes the police record; self-report surveys reveal many crimes never reported (the dark figure) but depend on honest, accurate answers. Using both gives the best picture.
Mission 2
Nobody is born knowing how to shoplift. So who teaches it?
Make a guess: Nobody is born knowing how to shoplift. So who teaches it?
Criminal psychology · learning theories
Learning by watching
Social learning theory (Bandura, 1977): behaviour, including crime, is learned by watching others.
A role model is someone we look up to, such as a parent, older sibling, friend or celebrity.
Identification: we copy people we feel similar to or want to be like.
Observational learning: we watch how the role model behaves. Modelling (imitation): we later copy that behaviour.
Criminal psychology · learning theories
Consequences you see, and consequences you get
Vicarious reinforcement: seeing a role model rewarded for a behaviour makes us more likely to imitate it. Seeing them punished makes imitation less likely.
Example: an older friend steals trainers and is admired by the group.
Direct reinforcement: when we copy the behaviour and are rewarded ourselves, we are likely to repeat it.
Internalisation: after repeated reinforcement, the behaviour becomes part of our own values and continues without reward.
Quick check
?Zane, 14, admires his older cousin. He watches the cousin spray graffiti on a bus shelter, and the cousin's friends laugh and cheer. A week later Zane sprays graffiti too. Which idea best explains why the cheering made Zane more likely to copy?
Key studyCriminal psychology · learning theories
Cooper and Mackie (1986)
Aim
To see whether playing or watching an aggressive video game affects children's aggression, and whether boys and girls differ.
Method
Lab experiment, independent measures; 84 US children (44 boys, 40 girls) in same-sex pairs. One played for 8 minutes while the other watched: Missile Command (aggressive), Pac-Man (low aggression) or a maze (control). Then free play with toys, and a button task to reward or punish another child.
Results
Girls who played or watched Missile Command played more with the aggressive toy; boys were hardly affected. No effect on rewarding or punishing another child.
Conclusion
Aggressive games can increase aggressive play in girls, but not aggression towards others.
Strength
Random allocation, so cause and effect.
Weakness
Toy choice is an artificial measure of aggression.
Criminal psychology · learning theories
Nature or nurture?
Social learning theory takes the nurture side: criminal behaviour is learned from the environment, through role models, reinforcement and internalisation.
Strength: it explains why offending often runs in families and friendship groups, and why it can be unlearned.
Weakness: it ignores nature. Biological factors, such as inherited personality (Eysenck), may explain why people in the same environment behave differently.
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of the learning explanations of crime?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Mission check
?Nobody is born knowing how to shoplift. So who teaches it?
Social learning theory says crime is learned by watching role models we identify with, such as family or older friends. Seeing them rewarded (vicarious reinforcement) makes us more likely to imitate them.
Mission 3
Could a personality test predict who ends up in court?
Make a guess: Could a personality test predict who ends up in court?
Criminal psychology · Eysenck's personality theory
Three dimensions of personality
Eysenck measured personality with a questionnaire, scoring people along dimensions.
Extraversion: sociable, lively, seeks excitement. At the other end, introversion: quiet, reserved, avoids stimulation.
Neuroticism: anxious, moody, emotionally unstable. The other end is emotional stability.
Psychoticism: cold, aggressive, lacking empathy.
Criminal psychology · Eysenck's personality theory
The criminal personality
Eysenck (1964, adding psychoticism later) proposed that offenders tend to score high on extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism.
High extraversion: seeks thrills and takes risks.
High neuroticism: reacts strongly and unpredictably to stress.
High psychoticism: cold and aggressive, with little guilt about hurting others.
A stable introvert (low on all three) is the least likely to offend.
Criminal psychology · Eysenck's personality theory
Born with it, shaped by childhood
Eysenck said personality is largely inherited: it comes from the nervous system we are born with, making this a biological explanation.
Extraverts have an under-aroused nervous system, so they seek extra stimulation.
High E and high N children are harder to condition, so they learn less from punishment.
Poor socialisation follows: they don't learn to link wrongdoing with anxiety, so they develop a weaker conscience.
Criminal psychology · Eysenck's personality theory
The brain behind the traits
Extraversion: the reticular activation system (RAS) in the brainstem controls how aroused the cerebral cortex is. Extraverts have low cortical arousal, and dopamine reward systems make thrills feel rewarding.
Neuroticism: a reactive autonomic nervous system and limbic system trigger fast, strong fight-or-flight responses.
Psychoticism: an overactive dopamine system, with too much dopamine at synapses between dopaminergic neurons, reduces inhibition.
Sort it
?Which trait does each behaviour suggest a high score on?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Quick check
?On Eysenck's questionnaire, Priya scores low on extraversion, low on neuroticism and low on psychoticism. What would Eysenck predict about her chances of offending?
Key studyCriminal psychology · Eysenck's personality theory
Heaven (1996)
Aim
To see whether psychoticism, extraversion and self-esteem predict self-reported delinquency two years later.
Method
Longitudinal correlational study; 282 students aged 13 to 15 from two Catholic schools in Australia completed questionnaires on personality, self-esteem and delinquency (violence, vandalism, theft), then again two years later.
Results
Psychoticism was linked to delinquency at both times and was the best predictor; extraversion only at the second time. Boys reported more delinquency. Together the traits explained only a modest amount.
Conclusion
Some support for Eysenck, especially psychoticism, but personality is a weak predictor; other factors matter.
Strength
The same students were followed over time.
Weakness
Self-reported delinquency may be under-reported to look good.
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of Eysenck's theory of the criminal personality?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Mission check
?Could a personality test predict who ends up in court?
Eysenck linked high extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism to offending, and offenders often do score higher. But many people with these scores never offend, so a personality test can only show a weak, average link, not predict who will end up in court.
Mission 4
Many people leave prison and offend again. What might work better?
Make a guess: Many people leave prison and offend again. What might work better?
Criminal psychology · punishment and rehabilitation
Recidivism and the aims of punishment
Recidivism means reoffending after being punished for a crime.
Punishment aims to deter (put the offender and others off), incapacitate (stop them offending, e.g. prison), give retribution (deserved payback) and rehabilitate (help the person change).
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) measures proven reoffending: a new offence within a year that leads to a conviction or caution.
A deterrent works only if people weigh up the consequences before acting.
Criminal psychology · punishment and rehabilitation
Prison
Adults released from custody: reoffending within one yearAdults released from custody: proven toreoffend within one year (MoJ, 2026)40.6% (about 4 in 10)proven to reoffend within one yearSource: Ministry of Justice, proven reoffending statistics,July to September 2024 cohort (published 2026)
Prison removes freedom: it incapacitates offenders and is meant to deter.
Reoffending within a year: 40.6% of adults released from custody (MoJ, 2026), and much higher after sentences under 12 months.
Strength: protects the public; time for education and treatment.
Weakness: offenders may learn crime from other prisoners, and lose jobs, homes and family links.
Criminal psychology · punishment and rehabilitation
Punishment in the community
A community sentence is served outside prison: unpaid work, a curfew, or drug or alcohol treatment.
Strength: the offender keeps a job and family. A MoJ study (2019) found similar offenders reoffended less after a court order than after a short prison sentence.
Weakness: may be seen as a soft option that fails to deter.
A fine takes money: suits minor offences, but may barely affect wealthy people.
Criminal psychology · punishment and rehabilitation
Restorative justice
Restorative justice meetingVictimTrainedfacilitatorOffender1What happened?2Who was harmed, and how?3How can it be put right?
In restorative justice, a trained facilitator brings the offender and victim together (or they exchange letters). The offender hears the harm caused and makes amends.
Strength: in UK trials most victims who took part were satisfied, and reoffending fell slightly.
Weakness: both sides must agree; offenders may fake remorse to look good.
It is a form of rehabilitation: it aims to increase pro-social behaviour, not just punish.
Criminal psychology · punishment and rehabilitation
Rehabilitation and positive role models
Rehabilitation helps offenders change through education, job training, therapy and treatment for addiction.
Positive role models, such as mentors who have stopped offending themselves, show pro-social behaviour that offenders can imitate (social learning theory).
Strength: tackles the causes of crime and builds pro-social behaviour.
Weakness: needs funding and the offender's motivation; it is hard to tell which part worked.
Calculate
?In one MoJ cohort, about 87,000 offenders were tracked and about 26,000 were proven to reoffend within a year. What percentage reoffended? Give your answer to the nearest whole number.
%
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of that punishment?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Quick check
?Dev, 19, has no previous convictions. He is found guilty of smashing a shop window. The court wants to reduce the chance that he reoffends and repair the harm. Which option does the evidence in this mission best support?
Mission check
?Many people leave prison and offend again. What might work better?
Prison protects the public, but reoffending after short sentences is much higher than after longer ones (MoJ, 2026). For similar offenders, community sentences are linked to less reoffending, and restorative justice can cut reoffending slightly and help victims. No single approach works for everyone.
Recap
Big ideas
Crime falls into types (violent, drug-related, acquisitive, sexual, anti-social), and what counts as crime is a social construct that varies with culture and time.
Official statistics count crimes the police record; self-report surveys ask people about crimes they have committed or experienced.
Each method misses different crimes, so psychologists use both to estimate the dark figure.
Social learning theory: crime is learned by observing and imitating role models we identify with, especially when we see them rewarded (vicarious reinforcement).
Direct reinforcement and internalisation make the learned behaviour last; the theory is on the nurture side of the nature/nurture debate.
Eysenck: personality varies on extraversion–introversion, neuroticism and psychoticism; the "criminal personality" scores high on all three.
Personality is largely inherited through the nervous system; under-arousal and poor conditioning lead to weak socialisation. The RAS, dopamine and the limbic system give each trait its biological basis.
Offenders often score higher, but many high scorers never offend, so the theory explains only part of criminal behaviour.
Recidivism is reoffending; prison, community sentences and restorative justice each have strengths and weaknesses.
Short prison sentences have very high reoffending rates; community sentences and restorative justice are linked to less reoffending for similar offenders.
Application: punishment has changed from deterrence towards rehabilitation, using restorative justice, positive role models, community sentences and fines.
🏆
Mini-lesson complete!
⭐⭐⭐
You've worked through Criminal Psychology for OCR GCSE Psychology (J203). 🎉
Mission 1Most crimes never reach the police. So how can anyone count crime?
Mission 2Nobody is born knowing how to shoplift. So who teaches it?
Mission 3Could a personality test predict who ends up in court?
Mission 4Many people leave prison and offend again. What might work better?