← GCSE Psychology · Edexcel · GCSE Psychology revision
⭐ 0
Edexcel GCSE Psychology (1PS0) · Topic 2 Memory
Mini-Lesson

Memory

5 missions. Guess, learn, then check. Your place is saved.

  1. Mission 1A number's gone in seconds; a joke lasts years. What's different?
  2. Mission 2You see everything for a split second. What decides what you keep?
  3. Mission 3He forgets a visitor in minutes but still plays piano. How?
  4. Mission 4Retell a strange story over months and it changes. Who edits it?
  5. Mission 5Same crash, but asked "hit" or "smashed". Why do memories differ?
Mission 1

A number's gone in seconds; a joke lasts years. What's different?

Make a guess: A number's gone in seconds; a joke lasts years. What's different?

Memory · processes of memory

Getting information in and out

The information-processing chainInputEncodingStorageRetrievalOutputProcessing
  • Memory works in stages of information processing: input → encoding → storage → retrieval → output.
  • Processing is everything that happens between input and output: encoding, storing and retrieving.
  • Encoding: changing information into a form memory can hold.
  • Storage: keeping it over time.
  • Retrieval: finding it and getting it back when you need it.
Memory · processes of memory

Three ways to encode

Three ways memories are encodedAcousticVisualSemantic0 7 9 1heard as sounda small mappictureknownknownknownlinked toexistingknowledge
  • Acoustic encoding: by sound, e.g. repeating a number under your breath.
  • Visual encoding: by image, e.g. picturing a map.
  • Semantic encoding: by meaning, e.g. understanding a joke.
  • Short-term memory mostly encodes acoustically; long-term memory mostly encodes semantically.
  • Information encoded by meaning and linked to what you already know is much more likely to be stored for a long time.
Memory · processes of memory

Storing and finding memories

  • Long-term memories are stored in an organised way, linked by meaning, a bit like a filing system.
  • Retrieval works best with a cue: a place, a smell, a picture or the first letter of a word.
  • A memory can be stored but not found. "On the tip of my tongue" is a retrieval problem, not a lost memory.
Quick check
?Ayo learns a door code by saying it over and over under his breath. How is he encoding it?
Quick check
?Zara reads a page of her textbook while thinking about the weekend. The next day she can't recall a single fact from it. Which process most likely failed?
Your answer
?You know your old teacher's name and you recognise it when a friend says it, but you can't bring it to mind yourself. Which process has failed?
Mission check

?A number's gone in seconds; a joke lasts years. What's different?
Mission 2

You see everything for a split second. What decides what you keep?

Make a guess: You see everything for a split second. What decides what you keep?

Memory · the multi-store model

Three stores in a line

The multi-store modelSensoryregisterShort-termmemory(STM)Long-termmemory(LTM)attentionrehearsalSensory inputrehearsal(maintenance)retrievalforgottenforgottenforgotten
  • Atkinson and Shiffrin's (1968) multi-store model says memory is made of three separate stores.
  • Information flows from the sensory register to short-term memory (STM) to long-term memory (LTM).
  • Attention moves information from the sensory register into STM. Anything not attended to is lost.
  • Rehearsal (repeating it) keeps information in STM; enough rehearsal transfers it to LTM.
  • To use a memory, it is retrieved from LTM back into STM.
Memory · the multi-store model

Encoding, capacity and duration

Features of the three storesSensoryregisterEncodingSame form asthe sense(images,sounds)CapacityVery largeDurationUnder a second(sights), about2 seconds(sounds)STMEncodingMainly acoustic(sound)CapacityAbout 7 ± 2itemsDurationAbout 18–30secondswithoutrehearsalLTMEncodingMainlysemantic(meaning)CapacityUnlimitedDurationPotentially alifetime
  • Each store differs in how it encodes information, how much it holds and how long it lasts.
StoreEncoding (coding)CapacityDuration
Sensory registerSame form as the sense (images, sounds)Very largeUnder a second for sights, about 2 seconds for sounds
STMMainly acoustic (sound)About 7 ± 2 itemsAbout 18–30 seconds without rehearsal
LTMMainly semantic (meaning)UnlimitedPotentially a lifetime
Quick check
?Mia hears a 12-digit order number once. When she tries to repeat it straight away, she gets only the first seven digits. Which feature of STM explains this?
Key study Memory · the multi-store model

Peterson and Peterson (1959)

Peterson and Peterson: recall falls with delayTrigrams recalled correctly (%)020406080100369121518about 80%about 10%Retention interval (seconds)Approximate results
Aim
To find out how long information lasts in STM when rehearsal is prevented.
Method
Lab experiment; 24 psychology students saw a trigram (three consonants, e.g. CHJ), then counted backwards in threes from a three-digit number for 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds before recalling it.
Results
About 80% of trigrams were recalled after 3 seconds but only about 10% after 18 seconds.
Conclusion
Without rehearsal, information is lost from STM very quickly; STM has a short duration.
Strength
Standardised procedure with tight control, so it can be replicated to check reliability.
Weakness
Trigrams are meaningless, so low ecological validity; counting numbers may have displaced the letters rather than letting them decay.
Calculate
?Your class repeats Peterson and Peterson's task. 25 students each recall one trigram after 18 seconds of counting backwards, and 3 get it right. What percentage recalled the trigram correctly?
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of the multi-store model?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Mission check

?You see everything for a split second. What decides what you keep?
Mission 3

He forgets a visitor in minutes but still plays piano. How?

Make a guess: He forgets a visitor in minutes but still plays piano. How?

Memory · amnesia and the brain

Losing memories before and after

Two kinds of amnesiabrain damageRetrograde amnesia:memories from beforeare lostAnterograde amnesia:new memories can't beformedpastfuture
  • Amnesia is a loss of memory, usually caused by brain damage, e.g. a head injury, a stroke or a brain infection.
  • Retrograde amnesia: losing memories from before the damage.
  • Anterograde amnesia: being unable to form new long-term memories after the damage.
  • A person can have both types at once.
Memory · amnesia and the brain

The symptoms

  • The two types cause different everyday problems.
SymptomAnterograde amnesiaRetrograde amnesia
New memories after the damageCan't be formed: forgets people, events and conversations within minutes; repeats questionsCan be formed as normal
Memories from before the damageMostly keptLost, especially those from just before the damage
Short-term memoryWorks, for a few secondsWorks
Skills (procedural memory)Usually kept; new skills can still be learned with practiceUsually kept
Quick check
?After falling from a horse, Priya can't remember the ride or anything from the week before it. She does remember the name of the nurse she met this morning. Which type of amnesia does she show?
Memory · amnesia and the brain

What amnesia tells us about memory

  • In anterograde amnesia, STM still works but new information can't reach LTM. This suggests STM and LTM are separate stores, a strength of the multi-store model.
  • But skills usually survive while memories of events are lost. This suggests LTM is more than one store, a weakness of the model's single LTM.
Sort it
?Which type of amnesia does each person show?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Your answer
?What is the name for the type of amnesia in which a person cannot form new long-term memories after brain damage?
Mission check

?He forgets a visitor in minutes but still plays piano. How?
Mission 4

Retell a strange story over months and it changes. Who edits it?

Make a guess: Retell a strange story over months and it changes. Who edits it?

Memory · reconstructive memory

Memory is rebuilt, not replayed

A recording or a reconstructionA recordingthe same clip, replayedA reconstructionstored fragmentswhat you know andexpectwhat you recall
  • Memory is not a recording. Each time you recall something, you reconstruct it from stored fragments plus what you know.
  • This is Bartlett's (1932) Theory of Reconstructive Memory: memory is an active process.
  • Gaps are filled with what seems likely, so memories change without you noticing.
Memory · reconstructive memory

Schemas

A birthday party schemaBirthday partyschemacakecandlespresentssinginggamesA recalled partycakepresentssingingcandlesadded from the schema
  • A schema is a mental framework of knowledge and expectations about something, e.g. what happens at a birthday party.
  • How schemas form: through experience and culture (repeated events, what we see and are told). New experiences update them.
  • How schemas shape memory: we recall what fits, leave out what doesn't, turn the unfamiliar into the familiar and add details we expect.
Key study Memory · reconstructive memory

Bartlett (1932)

Bartlett (1932)Bartlett (1932)The War ofthe GhostsBeforeAftercanoesboatshunting sealsfishingdetails changed to fit Englishculture15 minutesmonthsyearsrecalls get shorter
Aim
To see whether people's schemas, built from their culture, change how they recall an unfamiliar story.
Method
20 English university students read a Native American folk tale, "The War of the Ghosts", twice, then recalled it after 15 minutes and repeatedly over months and years (repeated reproduction).
Results
Recalls became shorter; strange and supernatural details were left out or explained away; details changed to fit English culture, e.g. "canoes" became "boats" and "hunting seals" became "fishing".
Conclusion
Memory is reconstructive: people use schemas to fill gaps and make an unfamiliar story make sense to them.
Strength
A meaningful story is closer to everyday memory than lists of words.
Weakness
Participants weren't told to be accurate, so some changes may be guesses; small, one-culture sample.
Quick check
?Volunteers wait two minutes in a dentist's waiting room, then are asked to list what was in it. Several list a fish tank and a pile of magazines. There was a fish tank, but no magazines. What best explains the magazines?
Memory · reconstructive memory

Reductionism and holism

  • Reductionism: explaining behaviour by breaking it into simple parts or one cause. Such a theory is reductionist.
  • Holism: explaining behaviour by looking at the whole person and all factors together. Such a theory is holistic.
  • The multi-store model is reductionist: three boxes and arrows.
  • Reconstructive memory is more holistic: it includes culture, experience and meaning. But it is also called reductionist: it explains memory through schemas alone, ignoring the brain.
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of the Theory of Reconstructive Memory?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Mission check

?Retell a strange story over months and it changes. Who edits it?
Mission 5

Same crash, but asked "hit" or "smashed". Why do memories differ?

Make a guess: Same crash, but asked "hit" or "smashed". Why do memories differ?

Memory · accuracy of memory

Leading questions

Same crash, different questionWhat actually happenedHow fast were the carsgoing when they hiteach other?How fast were the carsgoing when theysmashed into eachother?broken glass: not in theoriginal
  • A leading question suggests the answer, e.g. "Did you see the knife?" rather than "Did you see a knife?"
  • Information met after an event (questions, other people's stories, news) can blend into your memory.
  • The memory is distorted, and the witness doesn't realise.
  • In experiments, asking how fast cars "smashed" rather than "hit" led to higher speed estimates, and more people later "remembered" broken glass that wasn't there.
Memory · accuracy of memory

Schemas and witnesses

  • Witnesses don't take in every detail, so they fill gaps from their schemas: what usually happens, or what a "typical" robber looks like.
  • This can add details that never happened, or change ones that did.
  • Eyewitness accounts can decide court cases, so these errors matter.
  • A witness can be confident and still wrong.
Memory · accuracy of memory

False memories

  • A false memory is a memory of something that didn't happen, or happened differently. It feels just as real as a true memory.
  • False memories can be created by suggestion: leading questions, other people's accounts, imagining an event, or images and adverts.
  • Each time a memory is rebuilt, new information can get into it.
Quick check
?A police officer wants an accurate account from a witness to a car accident. Which question is most likely to distort the witness's memory?
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of research into leading questions and false memories?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Mission check

?Same crash, but asked "hit" or "smashed". Why do memories differ?
Recap

Big ideas

  • Information processing runs from input to output; the processing in between is encoding, storage and retrieval.
  • Information can be encoded acoustically, visually or semantically; encoding by meaning makes long-term storage much more likely, and cues help retrieval.
  • The multi-store model has three stores, sensory register, STM and LTM, which differ in encoding, capacity and duration.
  • Attention moves information into STM; rehearsal keeps it there and transfers it to LTM.
  • Peterson and Peterson (1959) showed that STM lasts only seconds when rehearsal is prevented.
  • Retrograde amnesia is the loss of memories from before brain damage; anterograde amnesia is being unable to form new long-term memories after it.
  • Amnesia can destroy memory for events while sparing short-term memory and skills (procedural memory).
  • Amnesia supports separate STM and LTM stores, but suggests LTM is more than one store.
  • Memory is an active process: we reconstruct memories from fragments and our schemas, so recall can change without us noticing.
  • Schemas form through experience and culture and shape what we recall: we leave out, change and add details to fit what we expect.
  • The multi-store model is reductionist; the reconstructive theory is more holistic, though it can also be called reductionist.
  • Memory can be distorted after the event: leading questions and other information blend into the memory, and schemas fill gaps, sometimes creating false memories that feel real.
  • Schemas influence eyewitness memory, which is strong evidence for the Theory of Reconstructive Memory.
🏆

Mini-lesson complete!

⭐⭐⭐

You've worked through Memory for Edexcel GCSE Psychology (1PS0). 🎉

  1. Mission 1A number's gone in seconds; a joke lasts years. What's different?
  2. Mission 2You see everything for a split second. What decides what you keep?
  3. Mission 3He forgets a visitor in minutes but still plays piano. How?
  4. Mission 4Retell a strange story over months and it changes. Who edits it?
  5. Mission 5Same crash, but asked "hit" or "smashed". Why do memories differ?

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Verify stage.

📣 Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

→ Back to GCSE Psychology · Edexcel

Specification points and sources for this lesson are listed at the bottom of the page.

Sources (24)

The specification points and sources behind this lesson.

  1. 1 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Psychology 1PS0 spec Issue 1, 2.1.1 (specs/pdftxt/edexcel-1ps0-spec.txt, line 437)
  2. 2 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Psychology 1PS0 spec Issue 1, 2.1.2, 2.1.5, 2.2.2 (specs/pdftxt/edexcel-1ps0-spec.txt, lines 446–476)
  3. 3 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Psychology 1PS0 spec Issue 1, 2.1.3 (specs/pdftxt/edexcel-1ps0-spec.txt, line 450)
  4. 4 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Psychology 1PS0 spec Issue 1, 2.1.4, 2.2.1, 2.3.1 (specs/pdftxt/edexcel-1ps0-spec.txt, lines 456–492)
  5. 5 Pearson Edexcel GCSE Psychology 1PS0 spec Issue 1, 2.1.4 (specs/pdftxt/edexcel-1ps0-spec.txt, line 456)
  6. 6 TutorChase, AQA A-level notes 2.1.2 "Coding, capacity and duration in the multi-store model", https://www.tutorchase.com/notes/aqa-a-level/psychology/2-1-2-coding-capacity-and-duration-in-the-multi-store-model
  7. 7 PsychologyZone Memory booklet, https://psychologyzone.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Pages-from-2.-PsychologyZone-Memory.pdf
  8. 8 TutorChase, "Coding, capacity and duration in the multi-store model", https://www.tutorchase.com/notes/aqa-a-level/psychology/2-1-2-coding-capacity-and-duration-in-the-multi-store-model
  9. 9 StudyMind, "Peterson and Peterson (Memory)", https://studymind.co.uk/notes/peterson-and-peterson-memory/
  10. 10 tutor2u, "Duration of short-term memory", https://www.tutor2u.net/psychology/reference/duration-of-short-term-memory
  11. 11 Wikipedia, "Free recall" (Murdock 1962 section), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_recall
  12. 12 Quail documentation, "Analyzing Murdock (1962) free recall data", https://cdl-quail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorial/murdock_1962.html
  13. 13 William Brookes School, Memory unit knowledge organiser (OCR), https://www.williambrookes.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Memory-Unit-Knowledge-Organiser.pdf
  14. 14 University of Southampton eprints, Wilson, Kopelman and Kapur (2008) abstract, https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/55417
  15. 15 Brainscape, "Wilson et al. (2008) Clive Wearing study", https://brainscape.com/flashcards/wilson-et-al-2008-clive-wearing-study-15573277/packs/22000014 and "Wilson (key study)", https://brainscape.com/flashcards/wilson-key-study-memory-15703300/packs/21909714
  16. 16 MRC CBU publication record, https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/publications/articles/6749
  17. 17 Pearson Assessments, Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/en/usd/p/100000281
  18. 18 Cognitive Atlas, Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, https://cognitiveatlas.org/task/id/trm_4b94b12bf0eb2
  19. 19 StudyMind, "Bartlett (Memory)", https://studymind.co.uk/notes/bartlett-memory/?catid=632
  20. 20 Vaia, "Bartlett War of the Ghosts", https://www.vaia.com/en-us/explanations/psychology/cognition/bartlett-war-of-the-ghosts
  21. 21 DePaul University reprint of a War of the Ghosts sample recall, https://condor.depaul.edu/dallbrit/extra/360/war-of-2.htm, and the original story, https://condor.depaul.edu/dallbrit/extra/360/war-of-t.htm
  22. 22 Themantic Education, "Key study: leading questions and the misinformation effect (Loftus and Palmer, 1974)", https://www.themantic-education.com/ibpsych/2019/02/25/key-study-leading-questions-and-the-misinformation-effect-the-car-crash-study-loftus-and-palmer-1974/
  23. 23 Brainscape, "Braun (key study) (memory) (Experiment 2)", https://brainscape.com/flashcards/braun-key-study-memory-experiment-2-15716346/packs/21909714, and "Braun et al. (2002)", https://brainscape.com/flashcards/braun-et-al-2002-study-into-adverts-and-15573308/packs/22000014
  24. 24 APS Observer, "Grand illusions of memory", https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/grand-illusions-of-memory-keynote-address-showcases-evidence-of-false-memories