relays information from the senses to the cortex: sensory processing
working at birth, then refined
Cerebellum
movement, balance and coordination
grows fast as babies learn to sit, crawl and walk
Cortex
cognition: thinking, language, planning
last; the front is still maturing in the teens
In Edexcel's terms: the hindbrain runs basic functions, the midbrain handles sensory information and simple movement, and the forebrain carries out higher-order thinking.
Development · the developing brain
What grows after birth
A neuron is a nerve cell that carries signals. A newborn has almost all its neurons.
Neurons pass signals across tiny gaps called synapses.
After birth, neurons branch and form huge numbers of new synapses. Fatty myelin sheaths and support cells add weight.
Rarely used synapses are later removed: synaptic pruning.
Quick check
?A newborn can breathe, suck and swallow, but cannot walk or do a simple puzzle. Which explanation fits brain development?
Your answer
?Which part of the brain, at the top of the spinal cord, controls breathing and heart rate and is already working at birth?
Mission check
?A baby has nearly all its neurons. So why does its brain triple?
The weight isn't new neurons. After birth, neurons grow branches and form huge numbers of synapses, axons gain fatty myelin, and support cells multiply. Later, unused synapses are pruned.
Mission 2
A hidden toy is "gone" to a baby; a year later they find it. Why?
Make a guess: A hidden toy is "gone" to a baby; a year later they find it. Why?
Development · Piaget's theory
Schemas: how knowledge is built
A schema is a mental framework of knowledge about something, built from experience.
Assimilation: fitting a new experience into an existing schema (a toddler calls a cow "doggy").
Accommodation: changing a schema, or making a new one, when an experience doesn't fit ("cows say moo").
Equilibrium: the balance when experiences fit our schemas. A misfit causes disequilibrium, which drives accommodation.
Children build schemas actively, by exploring.
Quick check
?A girl's schema for "bird" is "things that fly". At the zoo she learns a penguin is a bird, so her schema becomes "birds have feathers and beaks, and some can't fly". Which process is this?
Development · Piaget's theory
Four stages in a fixed order
Stage
Age (approx.)
Key features
Sensorimotor
0–2
learns through senses and movement
Pre-operational
2–7
uses language and symbols; thinking is not yet logical
Concrete operational
7–11
logical thinking about real objects
Formal operational
11+
abstract and hypothetical thinking
The stages are invariant: every child goes through them in the same order without skipping, though ages vary.
Maturation makes a child ready for the next stage; exploring the world moves them on.
Development · Piaget's theory
Three ideas from the early stages
Object permanence: knowing that an object still exists when out of sight. It develops at about 8 months, in the sensorimotor stage. Before that, out of sight is out of mind.
Egocentrism (pre-operational): seeing the world only from your own point of view.
Animism (pre-operational): believing objects are alive and have feelings ("the sun follows me because it likes me").
Sort it
?Which stage is each child most likely in?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Development · Piaget's theory
Piaget in the classroom
Readiness: a child learns a concept only when at the right stage, so teaching matches the stage.
Active learning: children learn by exploring and doing; the teacher sets up tasks, not just tells.
Concept of intelligence: not a fixed amount but a way of thinking that develops as schemas grow.
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of Piaget's theory?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Mission check
?A hidden toy is "gone" to a baby; a year later they find it. Why?
The younger baby hasn't yet developed object permanence, so out of sight is out of mind. At about 8 months, in the sensorimotor stage, the baby's schemas change: it understands that hidden objects still exist, so it searches for them.
Mission 3
Pour juice into a taller glass and a 5-year-old sees more. Why?
Make a guess: Pour juice into a taller glass and a 5-year-old sees more. Why?
Development · testing Piaget's theory
Conservation
Conservation: understanding that a quantity stays the same when its appearance changes (number, volume, mass).
Pre-operational children fail because of centration: they focus on one feature, such as the height of the juice, and ignore the width.
They also lack reversibility: they can't mentally pour the juice back.
At about 7 (concrete operational), children use decentration (weighing height and width together) and reversibility, so they conserve.
Development · testing Piaget's theory
Egocentrism and how it fades
Egocentrism: a pre-operational child assumes other people see what they see.
Piaget tested this with a model of three mountains, asking which view a doll could see. Young children tended to pick their own view.
Egocentrism declines as children learn to decentre from their own viewpoint, mainly during the concrete operational stage: the reduction of egocentricity.
Key studyDevelopment · testing Piaget's theory
Piaget and Inhelder (1956)
Aim
To investigate whether children can see a scene from another person's viewpoint.
Method
100 children aged 4 to 12 from Switzerland. A doll was placed at different positions around a model of three mountains. Children chose from 10 photographs (and arranged cardboard shapes) to show the doll's view.
Results
Children aged 4 to 6 mostly chose their own view; 7 to 9 year olds tried to show the doll's view but were inconsistent; 9 to 12 year olds chose the doll's view reliably.
Conclusion
Pre-operational children are egocentric; egocentrism declines during the concrete operational stage.
Strength
Standardised materials and procedure, so it can be replicated.
Weakness
The task was unfamiliar and hard; with a familiar scene, younger children succeed, so ability may have been underestimated.
Quick check
?A researcher shows a 5-year-old two equal balls of clay, then rolls one into a long sausage. The child says the sausage has more clay. In Piaget's terms, why?
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of Piaget's account of conservation and egocentrism?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Mission check
?Pour juice into a taller glass and a 5-year-old sees more. Why?
Pre-operational children centre on one feature (the height) and can't mentally reverse the pouring, so they think the amount has changed. At about 7, in the concrete operational stage, they decentre, use reversibility and conserve. Later studies suggest some can do it earlier when the task makes sense to them.
Mission 4
Telling a child "you're so clever" can make them do worse. Why?
Make a guess: Telling a child "you're so clever" can make them do worse. Why?
Development · Dweck's mindset theory
Two mindsets
A mindset is a belief about whether your abilities can change (Dweck).
Fixed mindset: ability is fixed. Needing effort means you're not clever, so you avoid challenges and give up after failing.
Growth mindset: ability grows through effort, practice and good strategies. Mistakes are chances to learn.
Dweck separates ability (what you can do now) from effort (the work you put in); in a growth mindset, effort builds ability.
Development · Dweck's mindset theory
Praise and beliefs about ability
Person praise ("You're so clever") links success to a fixed trait; after failing, the child decides they aren't clever.
Praise for effort (process praise: "You worked hard") links success to things they control, building a growth mindset.
Example study: Mueller and Dweck (1998): children praised for intelligence did worse after failing than those praised for effort.
Quick check
?After a race, a coach tells a young swimmer: "You're a natural. You were born to swim." According to Dweck, which mindset might this encourage?
Key studyDevelopment · Dweck's mindset theory
Gunderson et al. (2013)
Aim
To see whether the type of praise parents give 1- to 3-year-olds predicts the child's mindset (motivational framework) five years later.
Method
Longitudinal study of 53 children in Chicago. Parent–child interactions were filmed at home at 14, 26 and 38 months, and praise was coded as process, person or other praise. At 7 to 8 years, children answered questions about challenge and whether ability can change.
Results
Children who received more process praise were more likely to prefer challenges and believe ability can improve. Boys received more process praise than girls.
Conclusion
Praising effort early in life helps a growth mindset to develop.
Strength
Natural home setting; praise was coded with high inter-rater reliability.
Weakness
Correlational, so other parenting differences could explain the link.
Development · Dweck's mindset theory
Mindsets in school, and the critics
Schools praise effort and strategy, say "not yet" instead of "fail", and teach that the brain changes with practice.
Large reviews find mindset programmes raise grades only slightly on average, perhaps more for students at risk of low achievement.
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of Dweck's mindset theory?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Calculate
?A teacher records the 40 pieces of praise she gives in a week. 14 of them praise effort or strategy (process praise). What percentage of her praise is process praise?
%
Mission check
?Telling a child "you're so clever" can make them do worse. Why?
Praise for being clever suggests success comes from a fixed trait. When a task goes wrong, the child concludes they're not clever, avoids challenges and gives up: a fixed mindset. Praise for effort and strategy links success to things they can change, encouraging a growth mindset.
Mission 5
Teach a "visual learner" with pictures: will they learn more?
Make a guess: Teach a "visual learner" with pictures: will they learn more?
Development · Willingham's learning theory
The learning styles idea
A learning style is a person's preferred way of taking in information, e.g. visual, auditory or kinaesthetic (VAK).
The claim: students learn more when teaching matches their style.
In one survey, 93% of UK teachers believed this.
Context: Edexcel doesn't name learning styles, but Willingham's theory is partly a reply to them.
Development · Willingham's learning theory
Willingham's criticism
Daniel Willingham, a cognitive psychologist, calls learning styles a myth: there is no good evidence that matching teaching to a style improves learning.
People do have preferences, but in controlled tests students taught "in their style" don't learn more.
The best method depends on the content, not the learner: everyone learns a map from a picture and pronunciation by listening.
People are more alike than different in how they learn.
Development · Willingham's learning theory
What does help learning
Meaning: you remember what you think about ("memory is the residue of thought"). Lessons should make students think about what material means.
Factual knowledge precedes skill: you need facts before you can think critically or solve problems in a topic. Known facts free up working memory.
Practice and effort: practise until knowledge and skills become automatic. Ability can grow with effort.
Quick check
?A teacher wants her class to learn the shape of Africa's coastline. What would Willingham advise?
Quick check
?Two students are asked to judge whether a news report about volcanoes is accurate. The one who has studied volcanoes does far better. Which of Willingham's ideas does this show?
Development · Willingham's learning theory
Strategies to support development
Cognitive: set new tasks that need effort but are within reach. Ability varies, even day to day, so if a child struggles, check they understood the task.
Physical: choose useful movements, practise them in order until automatic, then raise the challenge gradually (raise the bar for a jump).
Social: model good behaviour (children imitate), build perspective-taking, help children control impulses and practise self-regulation, and don't over-use rewards.
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of Willingham's learning theory?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Mission check
?Teach a "visual learner" with pictures: will they learn more?
Probably not. Controlled tests find no benefit from matching teaching to a preferred style, and the best method depends on the content. Willingham says learning improves when students think about meaning, build factual knowledge and practise with effort.
Mission 6
Why do young children call 15 cups broken by accident naughtier?
Make a guess: Why do young children call 15 cups broken by accident naughtier?
Development · morality (debate)
Morality and morals
Morality is a system of ideas about right and wrong that guides how people behave. It is shared in a society, e.g. laws, religious teachings and customs.
Morals are an individual's own beliefs about right and wrong, e.g. "it's wrong to lie to a friend".
Psychologists study moral reasoning: how a person decides what is right, not just what they decide.
Development · morality (debate)
Piaget: from damage to intentions
Piaget (1932) told children paired stories: John broke 15 cups by accident; Henry broke 1 cup while sneaking jam.
Heteronomous morality (younger children, up to about 7): rules are fixed and made by adults; acts are judged by their consequences, so John is naughtier.
Autonomous morality (older children, emerging gradually from about 7 to 10): rules are agreements that can change; acts are judged by intentions, so Henry is naughtier.
Quick check
?A 5-year-old hears two stories. Sam breaks one plate on purpose to annoy his sister. Ali breaks four plates by accident while helping to clear the table. Following Piaget, who will the 5-year-old say is naughtier, and why?
Development · morality (debate)
Kohlberg's three levels
Kohlberg built on Piaget. He gave people moral dilemmas, e.g. should Heinz steal a drug he can't afford to save his dying wife? He scored the reasoning, not the yes or no.
Level
Right and wrong are based on
Heinz example
Pre-conventional
avoiding punishment; getting rewards
"Don't steal: you'll go to prison."
Conventional
others' approval; obeying laws and keeping order
"Don't steal: the law is the law."
Post-conventional
rights and ethical principles, which can outrank laws
"Steal: a life matters more than property."
Each level has two stages. People move up through them in order, and many never reach the post-conventional level.
Key studyDevelopment · morality (debate)
Kohlberg (1958)
Aim
To find out how moral reasoning develops with age.
Method
72 boys aged 10, 13 and 16 in Chicago were interviewed about moral dilemmas such as Heinz's and asked to explain their answers. Many were re-interviewed every few years into adulthood (longitudinal).
Results
Younger boys mostly reasoned at the pre-conventional level and teenagers mostly at the conventional level. Few people reached post-conventional reasoning, even as adults.
Conclusion
Moral reasoning develops through a fixed sequence of stages linked to cognitive development.
Strength
Following the same people over time shows real change within each person.
Weakness
Only boys were studied at first, so the stages may miss a morality based on caring; and answers to imaginary dilemmas may not match real behaviour.
Sort it
?Which level of moral reasoning does each statement show?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Development · morality (debate)
Cognitive development explains morality
Egocentrism fits pre-conventional reasoning: judging by what happens to me (punishment, reward).
Centration fits heteronomous morality: centring on the damage, as on height in conservation tasks.
Decentration lets children take others' views, supporting conventional reasoning about approval.
Formal operations (abstract thought) are needed for post-conventional reasoning.
Socialisation (family, culture, religion) also shapes morality.
Sort it
?Is each point a strength or a weakness of explaining moral development through cognitive development?
Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.
Mission check
?Why do young children call 15 cups broken by accident naughtier?
Younger children are in Piaget's stage of heteronomous morality. As in the conservation task, they centre on one visible feature (how many cups broke) and judge by consequences. As their thinking develops and they decentre, they judge by intentions, so Henry, who was sneaking jam, seems naughtier.
Recap
Big ideas
The brain starts as a neural tube; the forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain develop into the cortex, thalamus, brain stem (medulla) and cerebellum, maturing from autonomic functions to sensory processing, movement and cognition.
After birth the brain grows mainly by forming synapses and myelin, and then pruning unused synapses.
Children build schemas through assimilation and accommodation, driven by the need for equilibrium.
Thinking develops through four invariant stages: sensorimotor (object permanence), pre-operational (egocentrism, animism), concrete operational (logic about real objects) and formal operational (abstract thought).
For Edexcel's "role of education and intelligence": readiness, active learning and intelligence as developing thinking.
Pre-operational children fail conservation tasks through centration and a lack of reversibility; at about 7 they decentre, and egocentrism reduces.
Piaget and Inhelder's (1956) three mountains task supports egocentrism in pre-operational children, but the task may have underestimated them.
A fixed mindset sees ability as fixed; a growth mindset sees it as growing through effort, practice and strategies.
Praise for effort, not ability, builds a growth mindset; Gunderson et al. (2013) linked early process praise to a growth mindset five years later.
Evidence supports the theory, but large reviews suggest school mindset programmes have only small average effects.
Learning styles (e.g. VAK) are a popular idea, but Willingham argues that matching teaching to them doesn't improve learning; the method should fit the content.
What helps: thinking about meaning, factual knowledge before skill, and practice with effort.
Willingham's strategies support cognitive (effortful tasks within reach), physical (ordered practice until automatic) and social (modelling, self-regulation) development.
Morality is a shared system of ideas about right and wrong; morals are an individual's own beliefs.
Piaget: young children judge by consequences (heteronomous), older children by intentions (autonomous). Kohlberg: moral reasoning moves from pre-conventional to conventional to post-conventional.
Edexcel's debate, morality issues: cognitive development (egocentrism, centration, decentration, abstract thought) helps explain moral development, alongside socialisation.
🏆
Mini-lesson complete!
⭐⭐⭐
You've worked through Development for Edexcel GCSE Psychology (1PS0). 🎉
Mission 1A baby has nearly all its neurons. So why does its brain triple?
Mission 2A hidden toy is "gone" to a baby; a year later they find it. Why?
Mission 3Pour juice into a taller glass and a 5-year-old sees more. Why?
Mission 4Telling a child "you're so clever" can make them do worse. Why?
Mission 5Teach a "visual learner" with pictures: will they learn more?
Mission 6Why do young children call 15 cups broken by accident naughtier?