← Back to subjects
0
IB Diploma Geography SL · Internal Assessment (Fieldwork Report)
Mini-Lesson

Internal Assessment (Fieldwork)

Every IB Geography student writes one fieldwork report based on primary data you collect yourself. It is worth a big slice of your grade, so getting the method and analysis right really counts.

question collect present & analyse conclude & evaluate

This lesson walks the whole pipeline and drills the numbers you may need — sampling interval, Spearman's rank, and percentages. Press Start.

IA · overview

What the report must do

The IA is a written fieldwork report of around 2,500 words, built on a fieldwork question you investigate using primary data linked to the syllabus.

  • It is marked against IB criteria covering the question & geographic context, method, quality & treatment of information, written analysis, and conclusion & evaluation.
  • The report should read as a genuine enquiry: a clear aim, evidence, and an honest judgement of how well you answered it.

Golden rule: the whole report exists to answer one focused question. Every graph, map and stat must earn its place by helping to answer it.

Stage 1 · the question

A good fieldwork question

The strongest questions are focused, measurable, geographic and feasible in the time and place available. They usually contain a clear variable to test.

  • Link it to a concept or model (e.g. the Bradshaw model for rivers, a sphere of influence for shops, an urban land-use model).
  • Phrase it so it can be answered with data, not just described.

Example shapes: "How does river velocity change downstream?" or "Does pedestrian footfall decline with distance from the CBD?" — each names a variable that can be measured and tested.

Quick check

Pick the best question

?Which of these is the strongest IB fieldwork question?
Stage 2 · collecting data

Primary & secondary data

Primary data is what you gather yourself in the field (measurements, counts, questionnaires, environmental quality surveys). Secondary data comes from published sources (census, maps, official statistics) and gives context.

Before the field: a risk assessment and a pilot survey (a small trial run) let you fix problems with your method before you collect the real data.

Stage 2 · sampling

Sampling strategies

You cannot measure everything, so you sample. The main strategies are:

  • Random — every item has an equal chance (removes bias, but may cluster).
  • Systematic — take every nth item, or points at fixed intervals along a transect.
  • Stratified — sample sub-groups in proportion, so each is represented.
sampling interval = population size ÷ sample sizefor systematic sampling: how many items to skip between each one you pick
Calculate

Your turn — sampling interval

1A list has 200 possible survey sites. You want a systematic sample of 20. Calculate the sampling interval (pick every nth site).
nth
Hint: interval = population ÷ sample = 200 ÷ 20.
Quick check

Name the strategy

?You measure the river channel at points every 500 m along its length. Which sampling strategy is this?
Stage 3 · presenting data

Choosing presentation techniques

Marks come from choosing appropriate, varied techniques and using them well:

  • Located techniques on a base map — proportional symbols, flow lines, choropleth shading.
  • Graphs — scatter graphs to show relationships; bar and line graphs for patterns.
  • Every figure needs a title, key, units and a sentence saying what it shows.

Avoid: a wall of identical bar charts. Match the technique to the data type and to the question.

Sort it

Which stage of the report?

Tap a task, then tap the stage of the report it belongs to.

📋 Method

📊 Present & analyse

🧭 Evaluation

Stage 4 · statistical analysis

Spearman's rank correlation

To test whether two variables are related, geographers use Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs):

rs = 1 − ( 6 Σd² ) ÷ ( n(n² − 1) )d = difference between the two ranks of each pair · n = number of pairs

The result runs from +1 (perfect positive) through 0 (no correlation) to −1 (perfect negative). You then check it against significance tables.

Worked example

For n = 5 pairs, suppose the squared rank differences add up to Σd² = 4.

rs = 1 − (6 × 4) ÷ (5 × (25 − 1)) = 1 − 24 ÷ 120 = 1 − 0.2 = +0.8

Calculate

Your turn — Spearman's rank

2You have n = 5 pairs and the squared rank differences sum to Σd² = 10. Calculate rs to 2 decimal places.
r_s
Hint: r_s = 1 − (6 × 10) ÷ (5 × 24) = 1 − 60 ÷ 120.
Stage 4 · interpretation

Reading the result

The sign tells you the direction, the size the strength:

  • Close to +1: strong positive — as one variable rises, so does the other.
  • Close to −1: strong negative — as one rises, the other falls.
  • Near 0: little or no correlation.

Critical point: correlation is not causation. A significance test tells you how likely the pattern is due to chance, but you must still explain the geography behind it.

Quick check

What does r_s = +0.8 mean?

?Your analysis gives rs = +0.8. What does this best indicate?
Stage 4 · normalising data

Percentages & fair comparison

Raw counts can mislead if sample sizes differ, so we often convert to percentages to compare fairly:

percentage = (part ÷ total) × 100e.g. how many of those surveyed chose a particular response

Tip: stating a percentage and the sample size (n) is best practice — "65% of 40 respondents" is far stronger than "most people".

Calculate

Your turn — percentage

3You survey 40 people; 26 say the regenerated square feels safer. What percentage is that?
%
Hint: (26 ÷ 40) × 100.
Match it

Match the term to its meaning

Tap a description on the left, then its matching term on the right.

Description
Term
Stage 5 · conclusion & evaluation

Conclusion & evaluation

The report ends by answering the question with evidence, then honestly evaluating the enquiry:

  • State a clear conclusion that refers back to the original question and to your data.
  • Identify limitations — sample size, weather, measurement error, bias.
  • Suggest realistic improvements and how they would raise reliability or validity.

Examiner favourite: evaluation that links each limitation to a specific effect on the result — not a generic "I could have collected more data".

Quick check

What lifts an evaluation?

?Which makes the strongest evaluation section?
Recap

The big ideas to know

The report: one focused fieldwork question, ~2,500 words, marked on question, method, treatment, analysis & evaluation

Data: primary (you collect) vs secondary; risk assessment & pilot first

Sampling: random · systematic (interval = population ÷ sample) · stratified

Analysis: Spearman's r_s = 1 − 6Σd² ÷ n(n²−1); +1 to −1; correlation ≠ causation

Presentation: varied, located techniques; percentages to compare fairly

Evaluation: specific limitations & realistic improvements

You've walked the full fieldwork pipeline and the statistics behind it. Press Finish to see your score.

🏆

Mini-lesson complete!

⭐⭐⭐

You've worked through the Fieldwork Report (IA) for IB Geography SL. 🎉

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage Confidence Quiz, then lock it in with Verify.

📣 Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

→ Back to all subjects