← GCSE Psychology · AQA · GCSE Psychology revision
⭐ 0
AQA GCSE Psychology (8182) · 3.2.2 · Social context and behaviour Language, Thought and Communication
Mini-Lesson

Language, Thought and Communication

4 missions. Guess, learn, then check. Your place is saved.

  1. Mission 1One word for green and blue: do its speakers see colour differently?
  2. Mission 2A bee dances and the hive finds new flowers. Is that language?
  3. Mission 3Stand too close to a stranger and they step back. Who set the gap?
  4. Mission 4Babies born blind smile. Why do cultures read one face differently?
Mission 1

One word for green and blue: do its speakers see colour differently?

Make a guess: One word for green and blue: do its speakers see colour differently?

Language, thought and communication · language and thought

Which comes first, thought or language?

Which comes first, thought or language?ThoughtLanguageLanguageThoughtPiaget: language depends on thoughtSapir-Whorf: thinking depends on language
  • Piaget: language depends on thought. Thinking develops first; language comes later to express it.
  • Children who could not yet conserve were taught words like "longer" and "fatter". The words alone did not help them conserve: the concept must come first.
Language, thought and communication · language and thought

Can your language shape your thinking?

From no effect to language limiting thoughtLinguistic relativism: languageinfluences thoughtLanguage has no effecton thoughtLinguistic determinism:language limitsthought
  • The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: thinking depends on language. It comes in two strengths.
  • Linguistic determinism (strong version): language limits thought. With no word for something, you can't think about it.
  • Linguistic relativism (weak version): language influences thought. Words make some things easier to notice, sort and remember.
  • So two people whose languages divide the world differently may see it a little differently.
Language, thought and communication · language and thought

Evidence from colour and memory

WhoTheir languageWhat researchers found
Speakers of Zuni (a Native American language, New Mexico, USA)One word for yellow and orangeMore difficulty recognising and remembering yellow and orange shades than English speakers
Russian speakersSeparate words for light blue and dark blueBetter at spotting the difference between two shades of blue
The Dani (Papua, Indonesia)Two basic colour wordsMatched colours about as well as English speakers
  • Recall of events: Whorf claimed Hopi (another Native American language) had no words for time, so speakers thought about events differently. Later linguists found Hopi has many ways to talk about time.
  • Labels change recall: people redrew the same simple sketch to match the word they had heard with it.
Quick check
?A baby of 10 months can't say any words, but she lifts a cloth to find a ball she watched being hidden. How would Piaget use this?
Quick check
?A group of people has only two basic colour words, yet they sort many colour chips into the same groups as English speakers do. Which idea does this challenge most?
Sort it
?Strength or weakness of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Mission check

?One word for green and blue: do its speakers see colour differently?
Mission 2

A bee dances and the hive finds new flowers. Is that language?

Make a guess: A bee dances and the hive finds new flowers. Is that language?

Language, thought and communication · human and animal communication

Why animals communicate

  • Animal communication is passing information between animals of the same species.
  • It serves a small set of functions:
FunctionExample
SurvivalVervet monkeys give different alarm calls for an eagle and a leopard
ReproductionA peacock displays its tail to attract a mate
TerritoryRhinos leave dung piles to mark their boundaries
FoodAnts lay scent trails that lead others to food
  • These functions are limited: animal signals are about these basic needs, here and now.
Language, thought and communication · human and animal communication

How the bee dance works

How the bee dance worksRound dancefood near the hiveWaggle danceup = sunlonger waggle run =further foodOutside the hivehivesun directionfood directionflowerssame angle as inthe comb
  • A bee that finds food dances on the comb in the hive. Others follow it, then fly to the food.
  • Round dance: circling, when food is near.
  • Waggle dance: a figure of eight with a straight "waggle run", when food is further away.
  • Direction: the waggle run's angle from straight up matches the angle between the food and the sun.
  • Distance: the longer the waggle run, the further the food.
Key study Language, thought and communication · human and animal communication

Von Frisch's bee study

Von Frisch's bee set-upWindowGlass-walledobservation hivebees marked withpaint dotsNear dish of sugarwaterFar dish of sugarwaterOutsideInside
Aim
To find out how honey bees tell other bees where food is.
Method
Observation of marked bees in a glass-walled hive. Dishes of sugar water were placed at different distances and directions; returning bees' dances were recorded, along with where new bees then flew.
Results
Food near the hive produced round dances; food further away produced waggle dances. The waggle run's angle showed the direction of food relative to the sun, and its length showed distance.
Conclusion
Bees communicate the distance and direction of food through dance, a complex system that serves one function: food.
Strength
Careful, repeated observations over many years, confirmed by later researchers.
Weakness
Smell and sound also guide bees, which he underplayed; one species, so it may not generalise.
Language, thought and communication · human and animal communication

What human language can do

  • Humans communicate about anything, not only survival, mating, territory and food.
  • Displacement: talking about things not present, in the past or the future. You can plan ahead and discuss next week's party.
  • Creativity (productivity): making endless new sentences nobody has said before.
  • Animal signals are a fixed set about the here and now. A bee can't tell the hive about yesterday's flowers.
Quick check
?A vervet monkey sees an eagle and gives the eagle alarm call; the troop dives into the bushes. Which feature of human language does this signal lack?
Sort it
?Is this found in human communication only, or in humans and animals?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Mission check

?A bee dances and the hive finds new flowers. Is that language?
Mission 3

Stand too close to a stranger and they step back. Who set the gap?

Make a guess: Stand too close to a stranger and they step back. Who set the gap?

Language, thought and communication · non-verbal communication

Saying it without words

  • Verbal communication uses words, spoken or written.
  • Non-verbal communication (NVC) sends messages without words.
  • Main types: facial expressions, eye contact, body language (posture, gestures, touch) and personal space.
  • NVC often says more about feelings than words do, e.g. a "fine" said with a frown.
Language, thought and communication · non-verbal communication

What eye contact does

  • Regulating the flow of conversation: speakers look away as they start talking, then look back at the listener as they finish, signalling "your turn".
  • Signalling attraction: we look more at people we like, and our pupils widen.
  • Expressing emotion: a long stare can show anger; avoiding eye contact can show embarrassment or sadness.
  • Without eye contact (e.g. talking to someone in dark glasses), conversations have more pauses and interruptions.
Language, thought and communication · non-verbal communication

Body language

Open posture, closed posture and postural echoOpen posturearms uncrossed andresting, legs uncrossed,leaning slightly forwardClosed posturearms folded, legscrossed, leaning backPostural echoboth people copy the same arm and leg position
  • Open posture: arms and legs uncrossed, relaxed; signals friendliness and acceptance.
  • Closed posture: arms folded or legs crossed; can signal disagreement or defensiveness.
  • Postural echo: copying the other person's posture. It signals rapport, and people tend to like those who echo them.
  • Touch: a light touch on the arm can make someone more positive towards you, but rules about touch vary between cultures.
Language, thought and communication · non-verbal communication

Personal space

Four zones of personal spaceIntimatePersonalSocialPublicIntimateup to about 45 cm: partner, close familyPersonalabout 45 cm to about 1.2 m: friendsSocialabout 1.2 m to about 3.5 m: acquaintancesPublicbeyond about 3.5 m: an audience
  • Personal space is the area around you that feels like yours; uninvited entry feels uncomfortable.
  • Hall's approximate zones: intimate (up to 45 cm), personal (45 cm to 1.2 m), social (1.2 m to about 3.6 m) and public (beyond that).
  • Culture: comfortable distances differ. In many Latin American cultures, friends stand closer than is usual in the UK or Northern Europe.
Language, thought and communication · non-verbal communication

Status and gender

  • Status: people of similar status stand closer together; we keep more distance from someone of higher status, such as a head teacher.
  • Gender: on average, men keep a larger personal space than women.
  • Men tend to dislike someone sitting directly opposite them; women tend to dislike someone sitting beside them.
Quick check
?Ana finishes her point, stops and looks straight at Ben. Ben starts talking. Which function of eye contact is this?
Sort it
?Which type of non-verbal communication is each example?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Quick check
?At a work event, Sam stands about a metre from other trainees but nearly two metres from the company director. Which factor explains the difference?
Mission check

?Stand too close to a stranger and they step back. Who set the gap?
Mission 4

Babies born blind smile. Why do cultures read one face differently?

Make a guess: Babies born blind smile. Why do cultures read one face differently?

Language, thought and communication · explaining non-verbal communication

Darwin: expressions evolved

Darwin's evolutionary chainAncestor bares teeth before bitingOthers back off: fewer fights, better survivalSignal passed on in genes: the angry facetodayBaby smiles and criesCarers give attentionBaby more likely to survive
  • Darwin (1872) said facial expressions and other non-verbal signals evolved because they were adaptive: they helped our ancestors survive and reproduce.
  • Genes for useful signals were passed on, so the signals became innate (inborn) and universal.
  • Example: baring the teeth began as getting ready to bite. It became a signal of anger that can warn off an attacker without a fight.
  • A baby's smile and cry win carers' attention.
Language, thought and communication · explaining non-verbal communication

Evidence that NVC is innate

  • Neonates (newborn babies) smile, cry and pull a disgust face within days of birth, before they could have learned them.
  • Sensory deprived: children born blind smile, frown and cry like sighted children, though they have never seen a face.
  • Athletes blind from birth made the same expressions as sighted athletes when they won or lost.
  • Some expressions (e.g. happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, surprise) are recognised across many cultures.
Language, thought and communication · explaining non-verbal communication

Evidence that NVC is learned

  • Gestures differ between cultures. A thumbs up or "OK" sign can be friendly in one country and rude in another.
  • Cultures have display rules: learned rules about when to show or hide feelings, e.g. hiding disappointment in front of a teacher.
  • How people interpret faces also varies with culture. If it were all innate, everyone would read faces the same way.
Key study Language, thought and communication · explaining non-verbal communication

Yuki et al. (2007)

Emoticon faces and rating scale1234567891 extremely sad9 extremely happy
Aim
To see whether culture affects which facial cues, the eyes or the mouth, people use to judge emotion.
Method
Cross-cultural study of Japanese and American university students. They rated emoticons combining happy, neutral and sad eyes and mouths, from 1 (extremely sad) to 9 (extremely happy). A second study used edited photos of real faces.
Results
Japanese students rated faces with happy eyes as happier; Americans were swayed more by a happy mouth. Photos gave the same pattern.
Conclusion
Japan's culture encourages hiding emotions, so people learn to look at the eyes, which are harder to control. How we read faces is partly learned.
Strength
Controlled: everyone rated the same faces on the same scale.
Weakness
Artificial emoticons rather than real faces; university students only.
Quick check
?A two-day-old baby is given a drop of something bitter and screws up her face in disgust. What does this suggest about non-verbal communication?
Sort it
?Strength or weakness of Darwin's evolutionary explanation of NVC?

Tap a statement, then tap the group it belongs in. Then press Check.

Quick check
?In Yuki's study, a face had happy eyes and a sad mouth. Which result fits the study's findings?
Mission check

?Babies born blind smile. Why do cultures read one face differently?
Recap

Big ideas

  • Piaget: thought comes first and language expresses it. Sapir-Whorf: thinking depends on language.
  • Linguistic determinism (language limits thought) is not supported; linguistic relativism (language influences what we notice and remember) has support from colour studies and studies of Native American languages.
  • Animal communication serves a few functions: survival, reproduction, territory and food. The bee dance carries direction and distance, but only about food.
  • Human language has properties animal communication lacks, such as displacement (planning ahead, discussing the future) and creativity.
  • Verbal communication uses words; non-verbal communication sends messages without them, through eye contact, body language and personal space.
  • Eye contact regulates conversation, signals attraction and expresses emotion; open and closed postures signal different attitudes.
  • Personal space (Hall's zones) varies with culture, status and gender.
  • Darwin: non-verbal signals evolved because they were adaptive, so many are innate and universal.
  • Newborns and people born blind show basic expressions without learning them; but gestures, display rules and how faces are read are learned in a culture (Yuki et al., 2007).
🏆

Mini-lesson complete!

⭐⭐⭐

You've worked through Language, Thought and Communication for AQA GCSE Psychology (8182). 🎉

  1. Mission 1One word for green and blue: do its speakers see colour differently?
  2. Mission 2A bee dances and the hive finds new flowers. Is that language?
  3. Mission 3Stand too close to a stranger and they step back. Who set the gap?
  4. Mission 4Babies born blind smile. Why do cultures read one face differently?

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Verify stage.

📣 Smashed it? Share your score

Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

→ Back to GCSE Psychology · AQA

Specification points and sources for this lesson are listed at the bottom of the page.

Sources (19)

The specification points and sources behind this lesson.

  1. 1 AQA 8182 spec v1.1, 3.2.2 Language, thought and communication
  2. 2 AQA 8182 spec v1.1, 3.2.2 Differences between human and animal communication
  3. 3 AQA 8182 spec v1.1, 3.2.2 Non-verbal communication
  4. 4 AQA 8182 spec v1.1, 3.2.2 Explanations of non-verbal behaviour
  5. 5 Boroditsky (2001) study summary, UC Irvine lecture notes, https://sites.socsci.uci.edu/~lpearl/courses/ling240_2005sum2/Lectures/Lecture8bw.pdf
  6. 6 Prezi summary of Boroditsky (2001), https://prezi.com/jubob3s0boch/does-language-shape-thought-mandarin-and-english-speakers-conception-of-time-by-lera-boroditsky ; Brainscape Edexcel LTC deck, https://brainscape.com/flashcards/language-thought-and-communication-18139569/packs/22413080
  7. 7 St Gabriel's High School, Paper 2 Language Revision Booklet, https://www.stgabrielshigh.stoccat.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2024/10/Paper-2-Language-Revision-Booklet.pdf
  8. 8 Lymm High School Language and thought knowledge organiser, https://www.lymmhigh.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Language-and-thought-KO-HJE.pdf
  9. 9 Brainscape "Our view of the world" deck, https://brainscape.com/flashcards/l-t-c-our-view-of-the-world-10256151/packs/16336521 ; Toynbee School LTC knowledge map, https://www.toynbee.hants.sch.uk/assets/Uploads/Psychology/Individual-Knowledge-Maps/6.-Psych-KS4-Language-Thought-and-Communication.pdf
  10. 10 Brainscape Edexcel LTC deck (as S4)
  11. 11 Chen (2007), Cognition, abstract at https://scholar.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/en/publications/do-chinese-and-english-speakers-think-about-time-differently-fail-2/
  12. 12 American Bee Journal, "How Karl von Frisch deciphered the waggle dance" (Nov 2021), https://americanbeejournal.mydigitalpublication.com/articles/how-karl-von-frisch-deciphered-the-waggle-dance
  13. 13 Brainscape Von Frisch deck, https://brainscape.com/flashcards/human-and-animal-communication-von-frich-14403379/packs/21690814 ; St Gabriel's High School Paper 2 Language Revision Booklet, https://www.stgabrielshigh.stoccat.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2024/10/Paper-2-Language-Revision-Booklet.pdf
  14. 14 Toynbee School LTC knowledge map, https://www.toynbee.hants.sch.uk/assets/Uploads/Psychology/Individual-Knowledge-Maps/6.-Psych-KS4-Language-Thought-and-Communication.pdf
  15. 15 Brainscape Edexcel LTC deck, https://brainscape.com/flashcards/language-thought-and-communication-18139569/packs/22413080
  16. 16 Brainscape Human and animal communication deck, https://brainscape.com/flashcards/human-animal-communication-5030071/packs/7454116 ; Brainscape psycholinguistics deck, https://brainscape.com/flashcards/chapter-4-5697764/packs/8542608
  17. 17 Psychology Wiki (Fandom), "Proxemics", https://psychology.fandom.com/wiki/Proxemics
  18. 18 itotd.com, "Proxemics", https://itotd.com/articles/6277/proxemics/
  19. 19 Yuki, Maddux and Masuda (2007), Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, author copy, https://willmaddux.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/15846/2018/04/JESP-Face-Paper.pdf