Mini-Lesson
Paper 2: Comparative Essay
Paper 2 is a single comparative essay written in 1 hour 45 minutes . You choose one of four general questions and answer it by comparing and contrasting two of the works you have studied — entirely from memory , with no texts in the room.
The questions are general — applicable to many works — so you must fit your chosen works to the question, not the reverse. It is the assessment home of Intertextuality: connecting texts . Worth 35% of the SL grade. Work through each screen, answer the questions as you go and collect ⭐ stars. Any named work appears only as a swappable, illustrative example — the IB reading lists are chosen by your school and rotate, so this lesson teaches the skills and ideas , never a set text. Press Start when you are ready.
The question
Answer the question set
The single biggest Paper 2 failure is answering a prepared essay instead of the question on the paper .
Read all four questions; choose the one your two works genuinely fit.
Identify the question’s key term and define it in your own words — that definition frames the whole essay.
Bend your material to this question; never recite a rehearsed answer to a different one.
Quick check
The classic error
? The most common way to lose marks on Paper 2 is to:
Compare two works of different forms ❌
Answer a rehearsed essay instead of the actual question set ✅
Define the question’s key term ❌
Use short quotations from memory ❌
Structure
Integrate, do not sequence
Comparison must be integrated , not sequential.
Sequential (weak): everything about work one, then everything about work two — two essays glued together.Integrated (strong): each paragraph built around a point of comparison , holding both works at once.
The structural test: if your paragraphs are titled by work rather than by idea, you are not comparing — you are describing in turn.
Quick check
Integrated comparison
? Which structure shows genuine integrated comparison ?
A first half on work one, a second half on work two ❌
Paragraphs each built around a shared point of comparison, analysing both works together ✅
A plot summary of each work in turn ❌
One work in detail and the other mentioned once at the end ❌
Choosing works
Choosing your two works
Everything depends on the choice of two works .
Pick works with rich points of contact (a shared theme, form or technique) and illuminating differences.
Two works that are too similar yield a thin essay; two with nothing in common force strained links.
Ideally choose works of different form or origin so comparison has real traction.
Quick check
Choosing works
? When choosing two works for Paper 2, you should look for:
Works that are as similar as possible ❌
Works with rich points of contact and illuminating differences ✅
Works with nothing whatsoever in common ❌
The two shortest works you studied ❌
Sort it
Sort the Paper 2 habit
Tap a statement, then the box it belongs in.
✅ Answers the question well
Closed book
Writing from memory
Paper 2 is closed book . You write from memory.
Memorise a bank of short, exact quotations from each work — and never misattribute them.
Know each work’s structure , key scenes and techniques well enough to summon evidence under pressure.
Rehearse flexible comparative frames (power, freedom, memory, form) you can adapt to whatever question appears.
Quick check
Closed-book prep
? Because Paper 2 is closed book , effective preparation includes:
Bringing annotated copies of the texts into the exam ❌
Memorising short, accurately attributed quotations and each work’s structure ✅
Reading the works for the first time in the exam ❌
Relying only on the plot ❌
Balance
Keeping the works in balance
Keep the two works in balance .
Roughly equal attention and depth — an essay that neglects one work loses focus marks.
Alternate or interleave evidence so both works are continuously in play.
Use connectives of comparison (whereas, similarly, by contrast) to signal the relationship explicitly.
Quick check
The rule
? The no-double-dipping rule means:
You may reuse the same work in every component ❌
A work used for the Individual Oral cannot be used again in Paper 2 ✅
You may only study two works in total ❌
Paper 2 must use the same works as the IO ❌
Match it
Match the Paper 2 term to its meaning
Tap an item on the left, then its pair on the right.
The rule
The no-double-dipping rule
The no-double-dipping rule shapes your whole plan.
A work used for the Individual Oral cannot be used again in Paper 2.
So map your nine works across all components before the exam season, reserving strong, comparable works for Paper 2.
Plan early: discovering in the exam that your best two works are already spent is a self-inflicted disaster.
Quick check
Strong thesis
? Which is the strongest comparative thesis for a general question on conflict?
Both works have conflict in them. ❌
Work one has a war and work two has an argument. ❌
Both works locate their deepest conflict not between characters but within the form itself — one fractures its chronology to enact a mind at war with its own memory, while the other keeps a serene surface that the reader learns to distrust. ✅
Conflict is an important theme in literature. ❌
Criteria
The four assessment criteria
Know the four criteria (30 marks total).
A — Knowledge, understanding and interpretation: of both works, in service of the question.B — Analysis and evaluation: of authorial choices in both works.C — Focus and organisation: a balanced, coherent comparative structure.D — Language: clear, accurate, appropriately formal.
Note the weighting: Paper 2 is 35% at SL.
Quick check
The weighting
? At SL, Paper 2 is worth:
35% ✅
25% ❌
50% ❌
10% ❌
Game plan
A Paper 2 game plan
A Paper 2 game plan.
10 minutes: choose the question, define its key term, pick the two works, plan points of comparison.Body: three to four paragraphs, each a shared point, each holding both works.Evidence: brief, exact, correctly attributed; analyse the method in both.Close: synthesise — what the comparison finally reveals about the question.
Recap
The big ideas to take away
The task: one comparative essay on TWO studied works, 1 hour 45 minutes, closed book (35%)
Answer the set question — define its key term; never recite a prepared essay
Integrated comparison: organise by point, holding both works in every paragraph
Choose works with rich contact and real contrast — ideally different form or origin
Closed book: memorise short, correctly attributed quotations and each work’s structure
No double-dipping: plan works across all components before the exams
Criteria: A understanding · B analysis · C balance & organisation · D language (30 marks)
Paper 2 rewards the reader who prepared works, not answers. Press Finish to see your score.
🏆
Mini-lesson complete!
⭐⭐⭐
You have worked through Paper 2: Comparative Essay for IB Diploma English A: Literature (SL). 🎉
Your stars: 0 / 0
Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage Confidence Quiz, then lock it in with Verify .
📣 Nailed it? Share your score
Challenge a mate to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.
📲 Challenge a mate
👪 Show your parents
Restart 🔄
→ Back to all subjects
⬅ Back
Start ➡