Higher-level practice goes deeper into how ethnographic knowledge is made: the methods, the reflexive turn, the politics of representation, and ethics.
Answer the quick checks, the sort and the match as you go to collect stars. Press Start when you are ready.
Participant observation, taking part in daily life over a long period while systematically observing, was established by BronisΕaw Malinowski in the Trobriands. It requires learning the language, long immersion, and the aim of an emic understanding of the world from within.
Beyond participant observation, anthropologists use interviews, life histories, genealogies and kinship charts, key informants, field notes, mapping, and visual and digital ethnography. The data are qualitative and holistic, situating each practice in the wider way of life.
Reflexivity means examining how the researcher's presence, identity and standpoint shape the knowledge produced. Paul Rabinow's Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco (1977) modelled this. Feminist anthropologist Lila Abu-Lughod criticised the pretence of detached objectivity and the way ethnography can other its subjects.
Tap a practice, then tap what kind of practice it is. (Two each.)
The volume Writing Culture (edited by James Clifford and George Marcus, 1986) argued that ethnographies are partial, authored and rhetorical constructions, not neutral mirrors. This crisis of representation asks: who has the power to speak for whom, and how do writing choices shape the account?
Fieldwork ethics require informed consent, do no harm, anonymity and honesty. Philippe Bourgois (In Search of Respect, 1995) confronted these dilemmas directly. Nancy Scheper-Hughes argued for an engaged, even militant, anthropology answerable to the people studied. The dispute over Napoleon Chagnon's Yanomami research intensified debate about the researcher's obligations.
Fieldwork yields rich, contextual, emic knowledge, but is small-scale, subjective and hard to replicate, and the observer can affect what happens. Reflexivity and comparison are the main correctives, making the account more honest and more general.
Tap a term on the left, then its meaning on the right.
Fieldwork begins with negotiating access through gatekeepers, building rapport, and learning the language. These practical steps are also analytical: who grants access, and what you can and cannot learn, are themselves findings about power and social relations.
Because each study is small, anthropologists use comparison to test how far findings travel. Comparing cases distinguishes what is culturally particular from what may be a more general feature of social life, without flattening difference.
Ethics is an ongoing relationship, not a one-off consent form. Anthropologists weigh what they owe to key informants and communities, from anonymity and consent to tangible reciprocity and care, especially where power is unequal.
Participant observation: long immersion; take part and observe (Malinowski)
Methods: interviews, life histories, genealogies, visual ethnography
Reflexivity: the researcher standpoint shapes knowledge (Rabinow, Abu-Lughod)
Representation: ethnographies are partial and authored (Writing Culture)
Ethics: consent, do no harm, anonymity; engaged anthropology
Limits: small-scale, subjective; corrected by reflexivity and comparison
You can now analyse how anthropological knowledge is produced, and its politics and ethics. Press Finish to see your score.
You have worked through Anthropological Practice. π
Your stars: 0 / 0
Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage, then lock it in with Verify.