โ† Back to subjects
โญ 0
OCR A-level Religious Studies (H573) ยท Ethics ยท Meta-ethics
Mini-Lesson

Meta-Ethics

Meta-ethics steps back from asking 'what is right?' to ask what moral words mean and whether moral claims can be true. Positions split into cognitivism (moral claims describe facts) and non-cognitivism (they do not).

Work through each screen, weigh the range of scholarly views, answer the questions as you go and collect โญ stars. Press Start when you are ready.

The question

What is meta-ethics?

Normative ethics asks which acts are right. Meta-ethics asks the deeper questions:

  • What does 'good' or 'right' actually mean?
  • Are moral statements true or false (like facts), or something else?
  • Cognitivism: moral statements make claims that can be true or false.
  • Non-cognitivism: moral statements do not state facts โ€” they express something else, like feelings.
Quick check

Meta-ethics

?What kind of question does meta-ethics ask?
Naturalism

Ethical naturalism

Naturalism is cognitivist. It holds that moral facts are natural facts about the world, which can be observed or worked out.

  • For example, 'good' might just mean 'what maximises happiness' (a natural, measurable fact).
  • So moral statements can be true or false, verified like other empirical claims.

Problem: critics say you cannot simply reduce moral 'good' to a natural property without losing something.

Intuitionism

Intuitionism (Moore)

G. E. Moore is also cognitivist but rejects naturalism. He argues 'good' is a simple, unanalysable, non-natural property, known directly by intuition โ€” as we just 'see' that yellow is yellow.

  • The naturalistic fallacy: it is a mistake to define 'good' in natural terms (e.g. as 'pleasure').
  • The open question argument: for any natural definition of good (e.g. 'good = pleasant'), we can still sensibly ask 'but is the pleasant really good?' โ€” so they are not identical.
Quick check

Moore on good

?What does G. E. Moore intuitionism claim about the word 'good'?
Sort it

Cognitivist or non-cognitivist?

Tap a theory or claim, then which camp it belongs to.

โœ… Cognitivist

๐Ÿ’ฌ Non-cognitivist

Emotivism

Emotivism (Ayer and Stevenson)

Emotivism is non-cognitivist. A. J. Ayer (drawing on logical positivism) argued moral statements are not factual claims but expressions of emotion โ€” the 'boo/hurrah' theory.

  • 'Stealing is wrong' just expresses disapproval โ€” 'Stealing: boo!' โ€” and tries to influence others feelings.
  • C. L. Stevenson developed this: moral statements express attitudes and aim to persuade others to share them.
Quick check

Emotivism

?On the emotivist view of Ayer and Stevenson, saying 'murder is wrong' does what?
Prescriptivism

Prescriptivism (Hare)

R. M. Hare prescriptivism is also non-cognitivist, but says moral statements do more than vent feeling โ€” they prescribe action.

  • To say 'you ought to do X' is to recommend or command it.
  • And moral prescriptions are universalisable: if I say you ought to do X, I commit to saying anyone in that situation ought to do X.

Evaluate: non-cognitivism explains moral disagreement and motivation well, but seems to make morality merely subjective; cognitivism keeps moral truth but must explain what moral facts are.

Match it

Match the theory

Tap a theory, then its central claim.

Theory
Claim
Quick check

Hare prescriptivism

?According to Hare, what are moral statements doing, and what feature do they have?
Recap

The big ideas to take into the exam

Meta-ethics: the study of the meaning and status of moral language, not particular right acts

Naturalism: cognitivist: moral facts are natural facts that can be verified

Intuitionism (Moore): cognitivist: good is simple, non-natural, known by intuition; naturalistic fallacy

Emotivism (Ayer, Stevenson): non-cognitivist: moral claims express emotions and attitudes (boo/hurrah)

Prescriptivism (Hare): non-cognitivist: moral claims prescribe action and are universalisable

Meta-ethics underpins how seriously we can take any moral claim. Press Finish.

๐Ÿ†

Mini-lesson complete!

โญโญโญ

You have mapped naturalism, intuitionism, emotivism and prescriptivism. ๐Ÿ”Ž

Your stars: 0 / 0

Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage Confidence Quiz, then lock it in with Verify.

๐Ÿ“ฃ Nailed it? Share your score

Challenge a friend to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.

โ†’ Back to all subjects