OCR A-level Religious Studies (H573) ยท Philosophy ยท Ancient philosophical influences
Mini-Lesson
Ancient Philosophical Influences
Component 01 opens with the ancient Greek roots of philosophy of religion: Plato and his student Aristotle. Their disagreement about where true reality lies โ in a realm of perfect Forms or in the observable world of causes and purposes โ shapes every later debate about God, the soul and knowledge.
Work through each screen, weigh the range of scholarly views, answer the questions as you go and collect โญ stars. Press Start when you are ready.
Plato ยท the Forms
Plato: the Theory of Forms
Plato argues that the physical world we see is a world of appearances and constant change. Behind it lies a higher, unchanging realm of perfect Forms โ the true, eternal realities that particular things merely imitate.
Every beautiful thing is beautiful because it participates in the Form of Beauty; every just act reflects the Form of Justice.
The Forms are known by reason, not the senses โ Plato is a rationalist whose method is a priori.
The highest Form is the Form of the Good, which gives the other Forms their reality and makes them knowable, as the sun makes objects visible.
Source: the Forms, the Good and the sun analogy come from Plato's Republic. The Form of the Good is compared to the sun as the source of both being and knowledge.
Plato ยท the Cave
The Analogy of the Cave
In the Republic Plato pictures prisoners chained in a cave, watching shadows on a wall and believing the shadows are reality. One prisoner is freed, struggles up into the sunlight, and finally sees the real world and the sun itself.
The shadows = the everyday world of appearances we mistake for reality.
The journey out = the painful ascent of the mind through education toward knowledge.
The sun = the Form of the Good, the ultimate source of truth.
The freed prisoner who returns = the philosopher, often mocked by those still trapped.
Criticism to weigh: Plato gives no proof the Forms exist; the analogy can look elitist, and it devalues the empirical world that science studies so successfully.
Quick check
Reading the Cave
?In Plato's Analogy of the Cave, what does the sun outside the cave represent?
Aristotle ยท four causes
Aristotle: the Four Causes
Aristotle rejects a separate realm of Forms. For him, reality is this world, studied through the senses โ he is an empiricist whose method is a posteriori. To explain why anything exists as it does, he identifies four causes:
Material cause โ what a thing is made of (the bronze of a statue).
Formal cause โ its shape, structure or defining form (the statue's design).
Efficient cause โ what brings it about (the sculptor and their tools).
Final cause โ its purpose or telos (to honour a person). Aristotle thinks the final cause is the most important.
Source: the four causes appear in Aristotle's Physics and Metaphysics. Aristotle sees purpose (telos) built into nature itself.
Quick check
Name that cause
?A wooden chair exists so that someone can sit on it. Which of Aristotle's four causes does 'so that someone can sit on it' describe?
Sort it
Plato or Aristotle?
Tap an idea, then the philosopher it belongs to.
๐๏ธ Plato
๐ฌ Aristotle
Aristotle ยท Prime Mover
Aristotle: the Prime Mover
Aristotle observes that things in the world are constantly changing (moving from potential to actual). This chain of change must depend on something that itself does not change โ the Prime Mover, or unmoved mover.
The Prime Mover is eternal, immaterial and perfect โ pure actuality with no unrealised potential.
It does not push things like a physical force. It causes motion as a final cause, by being the object of attraction and desire โ everything is drawn toward it.
Its only activity is thought thinking itself, contemplating the highest object: itself.
Source: the Prime Mover is developed in Metaphysics Book 12 (Lambda). Note it is not a personal, loving creator like the God of the Bible โ it does not know or love the world.
Quick check
How does the Prime Mover move things?
?According to Aristotle, how does the Prime Mover cause motion in the universe?
Comparison ยท evaluation
Plato vs Aristotle: which is stronger?
The two thinkers model two whole approaches to philosophy of religion:
Plato is a rationalist: real knowledge comes from reason grasping eternal Forms beyond the senses. Critics say this is unverifiable and pessimistic about the physical world.
Aristotle is an empiricist: knowledge begins in observation, and purpose is found within nature. Critics say a final cause need not be a god, and modern science explains apparent purpose without one.
Both shape later theism: Plato's Good and Aristotle's Prime Mover feed into Aquinas' arguments for God. Whether either succeeds depends on whether a priori reason or a posteriori observation gives more secure knowledge.
Quick check
Two methods
?Which pairing correctly matches each philosopher to his method?
Match it
The four causes
Tap a cause on the left, then its meaning on the right.
Cause
Means
Quick check
The highest Form
?Why does Plato call the Form of the Good the highest Form?
Recap
The big ideas to take into the exam
Plato Forms: a higher realm of perfect, eternal realities known by reason; the Form of the Good is highest
The Cave: shadows = appearances; the ascent = education; the sun = the Form of the Good; the freed prisoner = the philosopher
Four causes: material, formal, efficient and final (telos) โ the final cause matters most for Aristotle
Prime Mover: eternal, immaterial, pure actuality; moves all things as an object of attraction; thought thinking itself
Methods: Plato = rationalist / a priori; Aristotle = empiricist / a posteriori
You can now compare a priori and a posteriori routes to ultimate reality โ the foundation of the arguments for God. Press Finish for your score.
๐
Mini-lesson complete!
โญโญโญ
You have worked through the ancient Greek foundations of philosophy of religion โ Plato and Aristotle. ๐๏ธ
Your stars: 0 / 0
Next: test yourself in the Evaluate stage Confidence Quiz, then lock it in with Verify.
๐ฃ Nailed it? Share your score
Challenge a friend to beat your stars, or show a parent how you got on.