AQA GCSE English Language (8700) · Paper 2: Writers' Viewpoints and Perspectives
Mini-Lesson
Paper 2: Writers' Viewpoints & Perspectives
This mini-lesson trains the skills AQA 8700 Paper 2 tests: reading two non-fiction texts from different times, summarising and comparing ideas and perspectives, analysing language, comparing writers' methods, and writing to present your own viewpoint.
Work through each screen, answer the questions as you go (spot the device, pick the best comparison, match viewpoint to method) and collect ⭐ stars. Press Start when you're ready.
Know the paper
What Paper 2 asks of you
Section A gives you two unseen non-fiction texts on a similar theme — one 19th century, one 20th or 21st century — so you can compare views over time. Four reading questions, 40 marks:
Q1 — True/false selection (4 marks) — pick the statements that are true about one text (AO1).
Q2 — Summary of differences (8 marks) — synthesise and infer across both texts (AO1).
Q3 — Language (12 marks) — analyse how one writer uses language for effect (AO2).
Q4 — Comparison (16 marks) — compare the writers' viewpoints and methods (AO3).
Section B — Writing (40 marks): write to present a viewpoint (argue/persuade) in a given form on a given topic. Assessed on content & organisation (AO5, 24) and technical accuracy (AO6, 16).
The big difference from Paper 1: Paper 2 adds comparison (AO3) — you must hold both texts in mind and weigh their views and methods against each other.
Quick check
Which is the compare question?
?Question 4 (16 marks) asks you to compare how the two writers convey their different attitudes. Which Assessment Objective does it mainly reward?
Q2 · Summary · AO1
Summarising differences (Q2)
Q2 asks you to write a summary of the differences between the two texts (e.g. two different experiences of school). This tests inference and synthesis, not analysis of language:
Find matching points — one detail in Text A that contrasts with one in Text B.
Infer — read between the lines: what does the detail suggest?
Support with brief evidence from both texts.
Don't analyse language in Q2. Save "the writer uses a metaphor" for Q3. Q2 is about what is different and what it shows, not how it's written.
Q3 · Toolkit · AO2
Language techniques & their effects
Q3 (12 marks) analyses one writer's language. Naming a device earns almost nothing — the marks are in the effect on the reader.
Emotive language — targets the reader's feelings (pity, anger, fear).
Rhetorical question — pulls the reader in; makes them agree.
Statistics / facts — sound authoritative; feel like proof.
Metaphor / imagery — make an abstract idea vivid.
Tone — sarcasm, outrage or warmth shaping how we read.
Direct address ("you") — makes the argument feel personal.
The golden rule: device → quotation → effect on the reader. Miss the effect and you're only "feature-spotting".
Quick check
Name the technique
?A columnist writes: "Are we really content to let our high streets rot into ghost towns?" Which technique is this?
Analysis skill · AO2
Comment on the effect, not the label
Compare two comments on the same line:
"The council's promises melted away like snow in spring."
▸ simile "like snow in spring"
Weak (feature-spotting)
"The writer uses a simile here. This is effective and makes it interesting."
Strong (device → effect)
"The simile 'melted away like snow' makes the promises seem flimsy and short-lived, so the reader distrusts the council and shares the writer's frustration."
Misconception: the marks are not for spotting the simile — they're for explaining why it works and what it does to the reader.
Quick check
Pick the best comment
?A writer calls a policy "a catastrophe for ordinary families". Which comment earns the most AO2 marks?
Reading skill · AO3
Viewpoint, perspective & tone
Comparison starts with reading what each writer thinks and feels, and how they show it:
Viewpoint — the writer's opinion or attitude to the topic.
Perspective — where they stand (an eyewitness? an outsider? a campaigner?).
Tone — angry, nostalgic, ironic, hopeful — set by word choice.
Purpose — to persuade, to warn, to reflect, to entertain.
Texts from different eras often share a topic but differ in attitude — that gap is exactly what Q4 wants you to explore.
Q4 · Comparison · AO3
How to structure a comparison
Q4 (16 marks) compares viewpoints AND methods. Use comparative connectives and, for each point, cover both texts:
Compare both ideas and methods in each paragraph — never write about one text, then the other in isolation.
Use connectives: "whereas", "similarly", "in contrast", "unlike Text A…". They keep the comparison explicit and score AO3.
Quick check
What's the weakness?
?For Q4, a student writes a whole paragraph on Text A's angry tone, then a separate paragraph on Text B's calm tone, never linking them. What's the main problem?
Mini-game
Technique → effect
Tap the effect that best matches each technique.
Section B · Writing
Writing to present a viewpoint
Section B asks you to argue or persuade — to put across a point of view on a topic (often linked to Section A's theme). Decode the task first:
Form — a letter, an article, a speech, an essay, a blog.
Purpose — argue a case or persuade the reader to agree.
Audience — a newspaper's readers, an MP, fellow students.
Your line — take a clear stance and stick to it.
Match the register to the audience. A formal article for a broadsheet differs from a speech to your peers. Getting the register wrong costs AO5 marks even if your ideas are good.
Quick check
Match the register
?The task: write an article for a national newspaper arguing that school days should be shorter. Which opening best fits the form and audience?
Persuasive toolkit
The DAFOREST toolkit
For a persuasive viewpoint, DAFOREST is a checklist of moves that win readers over. Weave several in — don't just tick boxes.
Direct address · Anecdote · Facts · Opinion · Rhetorical question · Emotive language · Statistics · Triples.
Some teachers use the related acronym AFOREST instead (Alliteration, Facts, Opinion, Rhetorical question, Emotive language, Statistics, Triples) — either checklist covers the same ground. The point is the techniques, not the acronym.
Mini-game
Match tone word → attitude
Tap a tone word on the left, then the attitude it signals on the right.
Worked model
DAFOREST in action
A short model opening for an article arguing for cheaper bus fares, techniques labelled:
"Every morning, my gran counts out coins she can't spare just to reach the doctor. Is this really the fair society we claim to want? Cut the fares, ease the strain, restore some dignity — before another pensioner is priced off the bus."
▸ anecdote (gran) · emotive ("can't spare", "dignity") · rhetorical question · imperative triple ("cut… ease… restore…")
Each device does a job — pulling the reader in, stirring feeling, then driving them to agree. It isn't just a list of tricks.
Quick check
Spot the comparison
?Which sentence does the clearest job of comparing the two writers for Q4?
Technical accuracy · AO6
AO6 — spelling, punctuation, grammar & vocabulary
16 of the 40 Section B marks are for technical accuracy and ambitious vocabulary — nearly a quarter. Easy to gain, easy to throw away.
Vary your sentences — mix short and long for control and effect.
Punctuate accurately — full stops, commas, and the occasional colon, semicolon or dash used correctly.
Reach for precise vocabulary — "unsustainable" not "bad"; "compelling" not "good".
Proofread — leave 3–4 minutes to catch slips.
Ambition with control beats safety with errors. Only use words you can spell and punctuate correctly.
Quick check
Spot the AO
?An examiner writes: "You synthesise and infer differences between the two texts, supported by evidence." Which question/AO is this?
Mini-game
Sort: reading skill or writing skill?
Tap a task, then the box for whether it belongs to Section A (reading) or Section B (writing).
🗞️ Section A — Reading
✍️ Section B — Writing
Exam-day plan
Working the paper for marks
Read both texts first and note each writer's viewpoint before you start.
Watch the mark tariff — Q1 (4) is quick; Q4 (16) and Section B (40) need the most time.
Q2: compare ideas, don't analyse language. Q3: analyse one text's language. Q4: compare methods across both.
In Section B, plan first — 5 minutes on stance, form and paragraphs saves the answer.
Save time to proofread for AO6.
Split your time by marks: Section A and Section B are worth 40 marks each — give each roughly half the paper.
Quick check
Reading the right thing
?For Q3 (12 marks, one text's language), a candidate spends half the answer comparing it to the other text. What's the problem?
Quick check
Where do the marks come from?
?In Section B viewpoint writing, a student changes their opinion three times and never settles on a stance. Why does this cost AO5 marks?
Recap
The skills to take into the exam
Q1 selection / Q2 summary (AO1): retrieve, then infer differences across both texts.
Q3 language (AO2): device → quotation → effect on the reader (one text only).
Q4 comparison (AO3): compare viewpoints AND methods in the same point, with connectives.
Section B (AO5): take a clear stance, match form & register, use DAFOREST.